Ever since I got the 7D my 400L/5.6 seems inadequately small. It used to feel hefty and big.
Has anything like this happened to anyone else before?
(No I can't justify buying a 500/4 using this feeling 
)
hqqns When the frick did I get this new title and why?  More info | Jun 02, 2010 02:45 | #1 Ever since I got the 7D my 400L/5.6 seems inadequately small. It used to feel hefty and big. subby
LOG IN TO REPLY |
StealthyNinja Cream of the Crop 14,387 posts Likes: 4 Joined Nov 2007 Location: Mythical Tasmania (the one with lots of tall buildings in the semi-tropics, A.K.A. Hong Kong) More info | Jun 02, 2010 02:52 | #2  Permanent banJust buy a 70-200 2.8L IS II and a 1DIV and be done with it mate.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Kiwikat Goldmember  1,024 posts Likes: 3 Joined Jun 2009 Location: Appleton, WI More info | Jun 02, 2010 02:55 | #3 You know you want to! "Would you really want to be the Canon rep responsible for dealing with POTN?" -FlyingPhotog
LOG IN TO REPLY |
StealthyNinja Cream of the Crop 14,387 posts Likes: 4 Joined Nov 2007 Location: Mythical Tasmania (the one with lots of tall buildings in the semi-tropics, A.K.A. Hong Kong) More info | Jun 02, 2010 03:05 | #4 Permanent banWe all know the only cure to this is a 1200L.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 02, 2010 04:39 | #5 Stealthy Ninja wrote in post #10287004  Just buy a 70-200 2.8L IS II and a 1DIV and be done with it mate.  Nah mate that focal length does nothing for me (EDIT: on a crop and putting it on a 1D would make it small again lol). And when I'm in it i use the 90mm Macro. I'm sad to say that I have used the 70-200 once in the last two years Yes, Yes I do, but I have a wife and kid and well I kind of like them being around lol. Stealthy Ninja wrote in post #10287046 We all know the only cure to this is a 1200L. LOL, do you think that would fit into a Porsche GT2? I might aswell get that at the same time subby
LOG IN TO REPLY |
stephen_g Senior Member  595 posts Likes: 1 Joined Sep 2008 Location: Auckland, NZ More info | Jun 02, 2010 04:42 | #6 |
Jun 02, 2010 04:44 | #7 stephen_g wrote in post #10287216 Why don't you flog the 70-200 then? Cause I'm not desperate for a couple of hundred bucks. Besides I'm trying to get the wife into some photography and she may want to use it??? subby
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tigerroach Senior Member  340 posts Likes: 8 Joined Mar 2008 Location: Houston, Texas USA More info | Jun 02, 2010 07:25 | #8 Yes it is kinda small for its reach - and that's a good thing. Small and compact means it is easier to have with you when you need it.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 02, 2010 07:32 | #9 tiger roach wrote in post #10287587 Yes it is kinda small for its reach - and that's a good thing. Small and compact means it is easier to have with you when you need it. I agree 100% since I've had it for 5+ years. It's bloody fantastic subby
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is semonsters 902 guests, 119 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
It's just the feeling I first had compared to now it's so different. 