Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 02 Jun 2010 (Wednesday) 14:06
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

is 5D > 5Dii a good move?

 
NBEast
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,699 posts
Gallery: 11 photos
Likes: 67
Joined Aug 2005
Location: So Cal
     
Jun 02, 2010 20:12 |  #16

K6AZ wrote in post #10291680 (external link)
Either I have a really good 5Dc or a really bad 5D2 but I'm not seeing a full stop in ISO performance between the two. I think the 5D2 is a little better but not nearly a full stop, at least with the two I'm comparing.

Hmmm. Link here (external link) for scientific charting that agrees with that statement.

I'm just skeptical of having smaller individual pixels. If they figured out a new pixel-lens or some sort of predictive algorithm that sucks more light or at least sucks enough light to make a good call (for each pixel) then the advantages of bigger pixel count is warranted.

Nikon's gone the other route ... forfeit being first in the MP wars for better actual performance in getting it right in low light (see the charts on Nikon comparisons ... they actually do have a full stop advantage).

My fear is mainly that I spend $1K to upgrade and wind up with marketing hype and possibly even a downgrade of IQ performance in difficult lighting. Ergo; this thread.


Gear List / Photos (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
randomlinh
Senior Member
Avatar
992 posts
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Maryland
     
Jun 02, 2010 20:48 |  #17

I don't think you'll see a downgrade of IQ in difficult lighting, just.. not as big of an improvement maybe. Or alternatively, enough of an improvement that it makes it for you.

My personal biggest gripe about the 5d2 is the AF system is old. Canon seemed to have been caught with their pants down on that one as soon as the D700 was released.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
K6AZ
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
10,250 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 9
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Richmond VA USA
     
Jun 02, 2010 20:53 |  #18

NBEast wrote in post #10291953 (external link)
Hmmm. Link here (external link) for scientific charting that agrees with that statement.

I'm just skeptical of having smaller individual pixels. If they figured out a new pixel-lens or some sort of predictive algorithm that sucks more light or at least sucks enough light to make a good call (for each pixel) then the advantages of bigger pixel count is warranted.

Nikon's gone the other route ... forfeit being first in the MP wars for better actual performance in getting it right in low light (see the charts on Nikon comparisons ... they actually do have a full stop advantage).

My fear is mainly that I spend $1K to upgrade and wind up with marketing hype and possibly even a downgrade of IQ performance in difficult lighting. Ergo; this thread.

One thing I don't agree with is the "packing more pixels in the same sized sensor results in more noise". One thing that is overlooked in this thinking are the technological advances in producing sensors. The 5D2 was released three years after the 5Dc.

One real advantage of the 5D2 is the resolution. I can get away with a 70-200 in situations where I couldn't on the 5Dc and crop. Even 100% crops are perfectly usable.


Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RDKirk
Adorama says I'm "packed."
Avatar
14,370 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 1375
Joined May 2004
Location: USA
     
Jun 02, 2010 21:31 as a reply to  @ K6AZ's post |  #19

If you're shooting portraits and landscapes, I don't know why the greater resolution isn't important to you.

The 5D2 has greater resolution that is quite significant at greater enlargements or with greater cropping. Even at moderate enlargements, I find the greater resolution of the 5D2 eliminates hair moire that frequently occurs with the 5D.

Live View on the 5D2 is an incredibly nice tool for both portraits on a tripod and landscapes. Manual focusing in Live View with the 5x/10X digital loupe is like working with a view camera tripod--except it's much brighter and right-side up. If you've never had that experience, you're in for a photographic treat. Also, the depth of field preview is actually usable because Live View automatically brightens the image (which you can't even get on a view camera). I've never had such perfect focusing from a DLSR.

And when you're shooting in ambient light (not flash), Live View Exposure Simulation actually works great--what you see is what you will get.


TANSTAAFL--The Only Unbreakable Rule in Photography

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
NBEast
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,699 posts
Gallery: 11 photos
Likes: 67
Joined Aug 2005
Location: So Cal
     
Jun 03, 2010 01:13 |  #20

I hear enough pluses that it sounds like I'll be pleasantly surprised about the usefulness of things like pixel count and live view on top of a noticeable improvement in all round performance and IQ.

I was shooting birds on my 7D with just a 70-200 and was positively amazed with the cropping ability.

This (external link)gets cropped into this (external link). There's something to this higher MP count.

Sometimes pleasant surprises come from the least expected areas.

Anyway; it's ordered and time for out with the old.

randomlinh, I hear you on the AF overlook. Canon needed a swift wake-up call. Healthy competition and all that.


Gear List / Photos (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
K6AZ
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
10,250 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 9
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Richmond VA USA
     
Jun 03, 2010 01:27 |  #21

If you like the cropping ability of the 7D you will absolutely love it on the 5D2.

Not to tempt you even more but there are a couple of authorized dealers selling them on eBay. With Bing, eBay bucks, and mr rebates you can get your net cost down close to $2k.


Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,668 views & 0 likes for this thread, 12 members have posted to it.
is 5D > 5Dii a good move?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Mihai Bucur
1051 guests, 169 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.