Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
Thread started 03 Jun 2010 (Thursday) 02:06
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Seyward & Justin Wedding, Gustavus, St. Peter, MN

 
heathermarie
Senior Member
Avatar
501 posts
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Mankato, MN
     
Jun 03, 2010 02:06 |  #1

Hi guys!

Need your critique on these shots. I've mostly always done 2nd shooting on weddings, but the photographer for this wedding showed up over an hour late so I took charge. I wish I had the confidence to do weddings solo, but even though the photographer I do a lot of work for doesn't know the technical aspect of the settings on her camera, for some reason she can get some great shots with that with program mode and that Carl Zeiss lens on her Sony.

I know the PP is everywhere on these.. but I want your guys opinion.. I'm REALLY liking the chocolate/sepia look.. but I kind of like that retro look. However, I'm thinking that "retro" look is a phase and isn't "classic" so I don't think I'll even show them to the bride.

Thanks POTN, you guys are great!

1.

IMAGE: http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4047/4665180327_9f0eb5b67b_b.jpg
2.
IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR

3.
IMAGE: http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4027/4665180823_ef0c757e60_b.jpg
4.
IMAGE: http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4040/4665180901_bc0af390cd_b.jpg
5.
IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR

6.
IMAGE: http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4017/4665181419_720e09a3fa_b.jpg
7.
IMAGE: http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1305/4665181139_2133570e5a_b.jpg
8.
IMAGE: http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4051/4665182041_2074790930_b.jpg

Heather

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
heathermarie
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
501 posts
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Mankato, MN
     
Jun 03, 2010 02:10 |  #2

Oh and there's more of these "fun" edits on my flickr at http://www.flickr.com/​photos/heatherhagge/ (external link)


Heather

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Quoimossa
Member
53 posts
Joined Jun 2010
Location: All over...Africa is home.
     
Jun 03, 2010 02:10 |  #3

looks good. i kinda like #3


Jimmy Stewart
Faut travailler, beaucoup travailler, encore travailler, toujours travailler.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BackTalk
Member
Avatar
188 posts
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Sacramento
     
Jun 03, 2010 02:54 |  #4

"KINDA?"

i love 3, i personally havent seen anything like it.

and 7 is very, whats the word

"postcard-y"

lets see what else you go!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mritchy
Goldmember
Avatar
2,091 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Dallas
     
Jun 03, 2010 04:43 |  #5

#3 and #8 be my faves.


Mr. Itchy
14L II, 17L TS-E, 35L, 24-70L II, 45 TS-E, 90 Macro, 50L, 85 1.8, 70-200L II, 200 f/2L

1Dx, 5D III, 6D
Weddings-Real Estate (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kja
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,923 posts
Joined Jul 2007
Location: 40th floor ledge but enjoying the view
     
Jun 03, 2010 04:55 |  #6

I'm recently loving (ok maybe not so recently) the more vintage toning, too, so I really like #3 and I would definitely show it to the couple. I do not like the cloud in the far left corner though.

Although black and white is timeless, I think #7 also begs for colour - I can just see that blue midwestern sky above the green grass!

#8 is cute :)

The processing on #2 does nothing for me but I think a quick tweak would help it a great deal. Also #5 seems a little nuclear...less saturation/vibrance/co​ntrast - more dreamy like #3 would be more appealing, I think.

Of course, it's all subjective so go with your gut.

OT - I have family in Mankato! I'm looking forward to seeing them in September when I visit again. Let me know if you need a second shooter, I'd love to do some stuff while I'm back!


Kristin

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
moeronn
Goldmember
2,516 posts
Joined Feb 2008
Location: SoCal
     
Jun 03, 2010 13:08 |  #7

With these shots, I doubt they would have minded if the main photog didn't show at all. These are all good and with last 3 really standing out for me. Very nicely done.


flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
heathermarie
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
501 posts
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Mankato, MN
     
Jun 03, 2010 18:50 |  #8

Thanks for the comments guys. I really appreciate it.

kja - what would you do with #2? Most of my traditional outdoor photos are similar to this one. I guess it is pretty flat, maybe I'll play with levels :)

Here's the color version of #7

IMAGE: http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4060/4665805152_dae87bbff5_b.jpg

Heather

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
emmaceleste
Member
Avatar
130 posts
Joined Oct 2008
Location: Buffalo, NY
     
Jun 04, 2010 08:59 |  #9

omg I *love* number 7 - much better in color, IMO. Gorgeous shot!

Plus - who cares if it's a phase (I know, everyone here will shoot me for that). If you're not editing all the pics in a "phase" style, and it's something the B&G like, then who cares if one or two are edited in a current phase, even if it will pass? They'll have several timeless photo's that aren't edited that way, as long as you don't go editing them all the exact same. Personally, I love the vintage phase. :)


Canon EOS 7D Mark II EOS 6D | Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM EF 85mm f/1.8 USM EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM EF 135mm f/2L USM | Sigma 50mm f/1.4 EX DG HSM

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nicksan
Man I Like to Fart
Avatar
24,738 posts
Likes: 53
Joined Oct 2006
Location: NYC
     
Jun 04, 2010 10:04 |  #10

3,4, 7 are very nice. I like 7 in color as well. I think they both work.

In 3, is that a patch of cloud on the upper left side? Just curious b/c I found myself drawn to it just a little bit. Not a big deal though...

Great stuff!!! :)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
calibro101
Mostly Lurking
13 posts
Joined Jan 2009
     
Jun 04, 2010 10:31 |  #11

great, I love the black and white ones




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Michelle ­ Brooks ­ Photography
Goldmember
Avatar
3,192 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 1
Joined Sep 2009
Location: SC
     
Jun 04, 2010 12:49 |  #12

Girl. Or dude. Or whatever. You got skills! I loved #7 as is until I saw it in color and that is gorgeous! Wonder how the couple feels about the "real" photographers photos after seeing yours??


Michelle Brooks Photography (external link) | Flickr (external link) | Facebook (external link) | Twitter (external link)
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
heathermarie
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
501 posts
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Mankato, MN
     
Jun 04, 2010 15:55 |  #13

hehe.. thanks for the comments guys.. i really wanted to see if anyone noticed, but apparently not(which is a good thing). The clouds in #7 are totally edited in. When I took the pic it was super overcast and practically black clouds because it was about to rain and it poured so we had to go inside.


Heather

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kja
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,923 posts
Joined Jul 2007
Location: 40th floor ledge but enjoying the view
     
Jun 04, 2010 18:04 |  #14

Heather - I'd probably warm it up a little if I was going to leave it in colour. And I'd be very tempted to black/white this one - maybe straight bw or maybe a little tone. I'd play around and look at the other images in the series to decide.

#7 in colour is beautiful, just as I knew it would be.

You did a lovely job and if you can handle the pressure of a wedding all on your own AND the rest of your images are good then there's no reason you shouldn't feel confident that you can provide a lovely service to couples!


Kristin

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
picard
Goldmember
Avatar
1,996 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Canada
     
Jun 07, 2010 02:00 as a reply to  @ kja's post |  #15

what lenses did you use for wedding shots?


Canon 1DM4,7D, Rebel XT
580 EX II, 430 EX II
Canon 70-200mm IS II L , Canon 85mm F1.2 L II, Canon macro 100mm F/2.8, 18-55mm kit
Sigma 18-200mm F/3.5-5.6, Sigma 10-22mm, Sigma 50mm F/1.4
Sigma 24-70mm F/2.8 EX DG HSM

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,017 views & 0 likes for this thread, 13 members have posted to it.
Seyward & Justin Wedding, Gustavus, St. Peter, MN
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ANebinger
1134 guests, 175 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.