Hmm, those seem much closer to what I'd expect.
Thanks Stealthy!
ToddLambert I don't like titles More info | Jun 04, 2010 22:43 | #31 Hmm, those seem much closer to what I'd expect.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TomW Canon Fanosapien 12,749 posts Likes: 30 Joined Feb 2003 Location: Chattanooga, Tennessee More info | Jun 05, 2010 19:34 | #32 Great job, Ninja! Definately similar results on test #2. The 1D4 sure has that 6400/12800 stuff working well. Tom
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jdizzle Darth Noink 69,419 posts Likes: 65 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Harvesting Nano crystals More info | Jun 05, 2010 21:10 | #33 Tom W wrote in post #10309285 Great job, Ninja! Definately similar results on test #2. The 1D4 sure has that 6400/12800 stuff working well. I can still see a slight brightness difference in the overall pictures, but I don't think that small of a difference can account for the larger difference in noise at the super-high ISO settings. This is giving me some pause to think about how I want to map out my camera future now. Why do you need to map your camera future? Just sell that 7D and get the MK IV.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jdizzle Darth Noink 69,419 posts Likes: 65 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Harvesting Nano crystals More info | Jun 05, 2010 21:12 | #34 Nice comparions Stealthy. I actually like the test images from the last batch with your hair clips. The 1D IV defintely has the edge.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TomW Canon Fanosapien 12,749 posts Likes: 30 Joined Feb 2003 Location: Chattanooga, Tennessee More info | Jun 05, 2010 21:16 | #35 jdizzle wrote in post #10309647 Why do you need to map your camera future? Just sell that 7D and get the MK IV. ![]()
Tom
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jdizzle Darth Noink 69,419 posts Likes: 65 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Harvesting Nano crystals More info | Jun 05, 2010 21:19 | #36 Tom W wrote in post #10309681 ![]() That's the general plan, but I'm holding back for a while. There are other financial considerations at this time. I hear ya. I would get the 1D IV if it was FF but, that's just me.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
StealthyNinja THREAD STARTER Cream of the Crop 14,387 posts Likes: 4 Joined Nov 2007 Location: Mythical Tasmania (the one with lots of tall buildings in the semi-tropics, A.K.A. Hong Kong) More info | Jun 06, 2010 03:23 | #37 Permanent banjdizzle wrote in post #10309651 Nice comparions Stealthy. I actually like the test images from the last batch with your hair clips. The 1D IV defintely has the edge. I put those in just for you jdizzle.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
austinnyc Hatchling 3 posts Joined Jun 2010 More info | Jun 06, 2010 07:14 | #38 why is there so much more saturation in the 5dMKII images? Call me a stickler but were both cameras set to the same picture style with the same settings? I know the MKIV is leaps and bounds better @ high ISO but this test seems a little off.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jdizzle Darth Noink 69,419 posts Likes: 65 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Harvesting Nano crystals More info | Jun 06, 2010 07:31 | #39 Forget the hairclips. You stole my Alien action figure!!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jdizzle Darth Noink 69,419 posts Likes: 65 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Harvesting Nano crystals More info | Jun 06, 2010 07:32 | #40 austinnyc wrote in post #10311248 why is there so much more saturation in the 5dMKII images? Call me a stickler but were both cameras set to the same picture style with the same settings? I know the MKIV is leaps and bounds better @ high ISO but this test seems a little off. I think it's the resolution of the 5D MK II.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
StealthyNinja THREAD STARTER Cream of the Crop 14,387 posts Likes: 4 Joined Nov 2007 Location: Mythical Tasmania (the one with lots of tall buildings in the semi-tropics, A.K.A. Hong Kong) More info | Jun 06, 2010 09:52 | #41 Permanent banaustinnyc wrote in post #10311248 why is there so much more saturation in the 5dMKII images? Call me a stickler but were both cameras set to the same picture style with the same settings? I know the MKIV is leaps and bounds better @ high ISO but this test seems a little off. Don't blame me, blame Adobe.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
nicksan Man I Like to Fart 24,738 posts Likes: 53 Joined Oct 2006 Location: NYC More info | Jun 06, 2010 09:55 | #42 austinnyc wrote in post #10311248 why is there so much more saturation in the 5dMKII images? Call me a stickler but were both cameras set to the same picture style with the same settings? I know the MKIV is leaps and bounds better @ high ISO but this test seems a little off. The MKIV isn't "leaps and bounds better" than the 5DMKII when it comes to high ISO noise!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
sadowsk2 Goldmember 1,179 posts Joined Feb 2007 Location: Macomb, MI More info | Jun 06, 2010 12:23 | #43 nicksan wrote in post #10311783 The MKIV isn't "leaps and bounds better" than the 5DMKII when it comes to high ISO noise! Ditto 1D Mk IV, 5D Gripped, 30D
LOG IN TO REPLY |
StealthyNinja THREAD STARTER Cream of the Crop 14,387 posts Likes: 4 Joined Nov 2007 Location: Mythical Tasmania (the one with lots of tall buildings in the semi-tropics, A.K.A. Hong Kong) More info | Jun 06, 2010 18:29 | #44 Permanent banI agree with Nick. In most cases the 5Dii has no more noticeable noise than the 1DIV. Especially after NR is added.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
nicksan Man I Like to Fart 24,738 posts Likes: 53 Joined Oct 2006 Location: NYC More info | Jun 06, 2010 18:35 | #45 Stealthy Ninja wrote in post #10313918 I agree with Nick. In most cases the 5Dii has no more noticeable noise than the 1DIV. Especially after NR is added. It's like the 1DIV vs D3s. In comparitive tests the D3s is better than the 1Div (in terms of noise) after PP however the 1DIV is very similar (up to 12800iso at least). Yep. The D3s is pretty amazing from ISO12800-25600, but honestly, at this point, all these bodies are amazing. 1DMKIV, 5DMKII, D3, D700, they are all pretty equal in terms of noise handling, and they are all amazing!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is MWCarlsson 1500 guests, 125 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||