Photozone's lack of a 24-70 2.8L "full frame" review seems to be a glaring omission in my opinion.
SchnellerGT Senior Member 585 posts Joined Apr 2007 Location: Washington, DC More info | Jun 04, 2010 13:31 | #1 Photozone's lack of a 24-70 2.8L "full frame" review seems to be a glaring omission in my opinion. Canon EOS 5D Mark II | Canon 24-70 2.8L II [FONT=Tahoma][SIZE=2][FONT=Tahoma][SIZE=2][FONT=Tahoma]| Canon 40mm Pancake | Canon EF 85 1.8 USM | Canon EF 135 F2L USM | Canon Speedlite 430 EX
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jpepper23 Member 110 posts Joined Dec 2009 Location: SE Michigan More info | Jun 04, 2010 13:37 | #2 TBH Im not sure anyone even holds them in high regard anyways. Like someone just posted something about them posting a review of the sigmalux on ff and they gave it 2 stars optical quality. Canon 450D | Sigma 30 1.4 | Canon 18-55 IS | Canon 85 1.8 | Canon 430EXII
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Poe Goldmember 1,956 posts Likes: 15 Joined Oct 2005 Location: Modesto, CA More info | Jun 04, 2010 13:52 | #3 Photozone doesn't keep an inventory of lenses for testing. They ask for lens submissions from fellow photogs/viewers.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is zachary24 1434 guests, 109 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||