Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 04 Jun 2010 (Friday) 15:20
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

85mm F1.2L II - Not happy

 
daft_togger
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
179 posts
Joined Dec 2008
     
Jun 04, 2010 16:10 |  #31

All, thanks for the contributions - I am taking away from this that I need to not treat this like my other lenses, that it will take time to get to know and I should perhaps not expect too much.

I will not be using it on a wedding shoot until I have mastered it's use !!!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Cam101
Senior Member
615 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
     
Jun 04, 2010 16:17 |  #32

I would have to agree with what has been said.. it's a great lens, but it's got quite the steep learning curve.. and it can be hot and miss at f/1.2

I played around with this lens a while ago and it is capable of some truly astounding images when everything goes perfectly..

Have fun with it!


Canon R5
Canon Lenses: RF 70-200 f/2.8L | EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro | MP-E 65mm Macro
RRS TVC-34L MkII | RRS BH55 and Anvil-30

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Laudrup
Member
217 posts
Joined May 2009
     
Jun 04, 2010 16:28 |  #33

This lens is very unforgiving at f/1.2, it would drive me insane shooting something as stressful as a wedding at f/1.2. Much better stopping this lens down and it's great for portraits. I felt a bit peeved at having to stop it down (after all I bought it because it was fast) but it really does benefit from practice and being stopped down.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FlyingPhotog
Cream of the "Prop"
Avatar
57,560 posts
Likes: 178
Joined May 2007
Location: Probably Chasing Aircraft
     
Jun 04, 2010 16:36 |  #34

The OP may already be aware of this site but if not:

http://www.dofmaster.c​om/dofjs.html (external link)

Plug in your body and lens to see how little DOF you truly have at various settings.


Jay
Crosswind Images (external link)
Facebook Fan Page (external link)

"If you aren't getting extraordinary images from today's dSLRs, regardless of brand, it's not the camera!" - Bill Fortney, Nikon Corp.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cy88
Senior Member
Avatar
818 posts
Joined Jun 2007
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
     
Jun 04, 2010 16:37 as a reply to  @ Laudrup's post |  #35

As many have said, it's really the technique that caused the OOF. I don't blame you - F1.2 is extremely easy to get OOF.

Make sure your camera is not on AI Servo such that when you focus & Recompose, the AF tries to focus again on something else casuing OOF.


6D | 5D2 | 24L II | 35L | 85L II | 100L | Panasonic GX7 | Olympus 12/2.0 | Panasonic 20/1.7
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
chomish
Goldmember
Avatar
1,917 posts
Joined Jun 2007
     
Jun 04, 2010 16:40 |  #36

daft_togger wrote in post #10303529 (external link)
I have recently purchased a Canon 1D mark 4 and an 85mm F1.2L II.

I have been getting so many out of foucus images with the 85mm it's not funny. Some times I get it bang on it's great, but a lot of time they are soft and oof.

With flash it helps a lot and you get nice crisp sharp shots.Taken with available light indoors and results are mainly displeasing. I've taken lots of shots at various ISO's and am not happy....

Anyone had similar experiences with this lens and is it a learning curve.

I have a 70-200 F2.8 and it's bang on much more consistently !

Well ive been through two of these lenses for that reason and ill share my findings.
I was having the same problem as you where on my 5D-2. I would take 4 shots at 1.2-1.6. 1-2 shots would come out so sharp that made me say wow. Then all of a sudden i would notice the others werent that sharp.

It drove me nuts. I tried eveything, and read everythign on this lens. I even bought a 200 dollar calibrating chart.

I came to the conclusion that its just normal for this lens. You just cant get 100% super sharp pictures at 1.2-1.6.

I have since learned to deal with it, and have been able to higher my % of super sharp photos with learning the lens. Give it time and you will learn the lens better and get nicer photos.

Its an amazing lens. And the OOF shots dont matter to me since the sharp ones just look, out of this world.

Hope this helps...:)


:) 5D-2 Mark ii :) 16-35 2.8L | 24-70 2.8L | 85 1.2 IIL | 70-200 f4 ISL | 70-200 2.8 IS IIL | 24-70 2.8L |MP-E 65 | 580EX, 430EX, MT24-EX | :p :p :p

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
alt4852
Goldmember
Avatar
3,419 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Northern Virginia
     
Jun 04, 2010 16:47 |  #37

daft_togger wrote in post #10303864 (external link)
All, thanks for the contributions - I am taking away from this that I need to not treat this like my other lenses, that it will take time to get to know and I should perhaps not expect too much.

I will not be using it on a wedding shoot until I have mastered it's use !!!

i use my 85L for weddings and the results i get from it are stunning. the point isn't to not expect too much, the point is to understand what it is, and not expect it to do things that are physically impossible (ie: shooting at MFD at f/1.2 and expecting someone's whole head to be in focus).


5D4 | Z21 | 35L2 | 50L | 85L2 | 135L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Cesium
Goldmember
1,967 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jun 2009
     
Jun 04, 2010 16:48 |  #38

daft_togger wrote in post #10303736 (external link)
Exposure: 0.013 sec (1/80)

Exposure: 0.017 sec (1/60)


There is your problem. Try to keep shutter speed above 1/100 with this lens for best results.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
EcoRick
Goldmember
1,863 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Nov 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
     
Jun 04, 2010 16:48 |  #39

daft_togger wrote in post #10303706 (external link)
...and if it's unreliable at F1.2 then I cannot run the risk...

I'm the one that's unreliable at 1.2. I use mine at 1.2 when I have a little distance between my subject, when I have to because of poor lighting conditions, or when I want to get REAL shallow DOF. When I want shallow DOF, I take a few shots and always a few are soft because of user error. I know it's great to use at 1.2, but it I find I get great results stopped down some.


Gear: Canon 1Ds MkII, 35L, 85L, 135L, 24-105L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Pekka
El General Moderator
Avatar
18,396 posts
Gallery: 36 photos
Best ofs: 7
Likes: 2526
Joined Mar 2001
Location: Hellsinki, Finland
     
Jun 04, 2010 17:06 |  #40

I have had hard time getting consistent results with 85 1.2 (original & II) and 1D series, but with 5D Mark II it seems much easier. Maybe it's the FF signal path, which these EF lenses were designed for.

I know this is not the normal way, but try with 1D this: Set on AI Servo + ring of fire (all AF points active), start focus with center point aimed at desired target (eye) and then recompose while keeping focus running and initial focus target inside ring of fire. Many will say that using servo and RoF with 1.2 is insane, but please check it out - it might help. Because with 1.2 if you sway 5mm front and back (and people can't help it) you'll miss the intended AF plane. If your camera is in good calibration, AI Servo will do the job.


The Forum Boss, El General Moderator
AMASS 2.5 Changelog (installed here now)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Madweasel
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,224 posts
Likes: 61
Joined Jun 2006
Location: Fareham, UK
     
Jun 04, 2010 17:17 |  #41

In the f/1.2 examples you give the hair fringe is sharp. The DOF is so shallow you have to be very precise with where you put the focus. How are you choosing focus point? The camera won't automatically know where you want it.


Mark.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MikeFairbanks
Cream of the Crop
6,428 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jun 2009
     
Jun 04, 2010 17:21 |  #42

1.2 is about as low as someone can go (or high....it always confuses me that people say it the other way around).

Anyway, at 0 you have 100% blur or oof. If you turn on the camera without a lens it will say 0 aperature in the display. It's impossible to focus at 0. So 1.2 is extremely challenging.

I had the 85 1.8 and it was the same thing. Very difficult to nail focus, especially on impatient subjects who don't like to hold still (which is pretty much everyone I know).


Thank you. bw!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Drozz119
Goldmember
Avatar
1,340 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Pittsburgh, Pa
     
Jun 04, 2010 17:25 |  #43

Cesium wrote in post #10304053 (external link)
There is your problem. Try to keep shutter speed above 1/100 with this lens for best results.

This ^^^


ShoFilms (external link)
gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
daft_togger
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
179 posts
Joined Dec 2008
     
Jun 04, 2010 17:26 |  #44

Madweasel wrote in post #10304208 (external link)
In the f/1.2 examples you give the hair fringe is sharp. The DOF is so shallow you have to be very precise with where you put the focus. How are you choosing focus point? The camera won't automatically know where you want it.

I predominantly use centre focal point. I am glad I made this post though cause I was gonna sell it and just use my 70-200 for portraits...and what with having a portrait shoot this Sunday, I need to ensure I take right lens...so I'll perhaps use the 85 on my 5D at F2 to F2.8 and see how I get on taking like for like with my 70-200 on the 1D




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
daft_togger
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
179 posts
Joined Dec 2008
     
Jun 04, 2010 17:28 |  #45

MikeFairbanks wrote in post #10304228 (external link)
1.2 is about as low as someone can go (or high....it always confuses me that people say it the other way around).

Anyway, at 0 you have 100% blur or oof. If you turn on the camera without a lens it will say 0 aperature in the display. It's impossible to focus at 0. So 1.2 is extremely challenging.

I had the 85 1.8 and it was the same thing. Very difficult to nail focus, especially on impatient subjects who don't like to hold still (which is pretty much everyone I know).

Thanks Mike, good way of explaining it......learning here....research before spending a load of cash ! However this lens still get's a lot of praise, I will be keep it for now and practice !




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

9,515 views & 0 likes for this thread, 40 members have posted to it.
85mm F1.2L II - Not happy
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Thunderstream
2112 guests, 102 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.