Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 05 Jun 2010 (Saturday) 12:50
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

"L" stands for lemon

 
leo_jb
Hatchling
7 posts
Joined Jun 2010
     
Jun 05, 2010 12:50 |  #1

I invested in an EF 70-200 f/4 USM lens a while back primarily to take photos of my kids playing soccer. The focus of the photos I took were inconsistent - about half were sharp and half were very soft, blurry even. I thought it was me and played with the settings on the camera, higher shutter speed, etc., to no avail. I finally set the camera and lens up on a tripod and tested it. What do you know - the lens can not focus at 200mm wide open. Just goes from blurry to blurrier (is there such a word?). It gets better at shorter focal lengths and is pretty clear at 135mm. I sent it to Canon (Irvine, CA) for repair, and even though it was just out of warranty, they attempted to fix it for free. Problem is, they never did fix it, even after three tries. I am about to give up. Anyone else ever had this problem? Suggestions on how to proceed?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Sports_Dude
Goldmember
1,112 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Feb 2008
Location: California
     
Jun 05, 2010 12:53 |  #2

How about posting some examples. What equipment are you using?


Sports_Dude
7D Gripped | 17-55 f/2.8 IS | 70-200 f/2.8L IS | 100-400 f/4.5-5.6L IS II | 580EXII

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
lankforddl
Senior Member
Avatar
747 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 5
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Minnesota
     
Jun 05, 2010 12:56 |  #3

I suspect that your experience with the 70-200 is 1-in-a-million. This lens and the lot of canon 70-200 are the best team of lenses that exist on earth. :-)


5DIICAN17-40CAN50CAN85CAN100CAN135CAN70-200

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CountryBoy
"Tired of Goldmember label"
Avatar
5,168 posts
Joined May 2006
Location: Okie
     
Jun 05, 2010 13:33 |  #4

lankforddl wrote in post #10307694 (external link)
I suspect that your experience with the 70-200 is 1-in-a-million. This lens and the lot of canon 70-200 are the best team of lenses that exist on earth. :-)

Not really there was one a couple of weeks ago, https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=874190 , but I guessed they was able to fix this one.


Hi

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sebr
Goldmember
Avatar
4,628 posts
Likes: 9
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Sweden/France
     
Jun 05, 2010 13:37 |  #5

Example with exif would be very useful here.


Sebastien
5D mkIII ; 17-40L ; 24-105L ; 70-200L II ; 70-300L ; 35L ; Σ85/1.4 ; 135L ; 100macro ; Kenko 1.4x ; 2x mkIII ; 580EXII
M5 ; M1 ; 11-22 ; 18-150 ; 22/2.0 ; EF adapter; Manfrotto LED
Benron Tripod; ThinkTank, Lowepro and Crumpler bags; Fjällräven backpack

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jp129
Senior Member
Avatar
294 posts
Joined May 2010
Location: TEXAS
     
Jun 05, 2010 13:41 |  #6

Anything mass produced is not going to be perfect. There will be a small chance that a few lemons slip by QC and end up in the hands on the end user. That doesn't necessarily mean that they all suck. Have you contacted Canon again that after 3 tries it is still not working?

Have you tried the lens on a different body? If you have not, I would highly recommend you doing that to rule out the body.


DRIVER > GLASS > BODY

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
versedmb
Goldmember
4,448 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Apr 2006
     
Jun 05, 2010 13:59 |  #7

That's really a shame. Its one of my favorite lenses.

Here's mine at f/4...

IMAGE: http://brownphotography.smugmug.com/Other/Summer-09/IMG5340-Copy-501/622791808_VqTEy-XL.jpg

Gear List

Michael

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Brennan.M
Goldmember
Avatar
2,599 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Jul 2008
Location: Cookeville, TN
     
Jun 05, 2010 14:24 |  #8

Mine is amazing, I think you must have got a lemon. I wish you had waited to buy a bad lens so I could sell you mine so I can get a 135L lol


www.qualityimagesupply​.com (external link)
Leica M3 | Mamiya 7 | Fuji X-Pro1

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Airedale1
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,023 posts
Gallery: 80 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 733
Joined Jan 2005
Location: Laconia, NH USA
     
Jun 05, 2010 14:42 |  #9

Please show us some examples with exif info. What body are you using? Did you try it with other bodies?

I find it peculiar to say the least, that Canon would send out the same lens 3 times, without rectifying the problem.


Sony RX10 M4
Canon S90

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mmahoney
Goldmember
Avatar
2,789 posts
Joined Jan 2007
     
Jun 05, 2010 15:37 |  #10

leo_jb wrote in post #10307670 (external link)
Suggestions on how to proceed?

After 3 trips to Canon repair with a VERY highly regarded lens I would start to consider what else in the image making chain could be causing problems .. test the lens on another body to be sure it's not a fault with the cameras AF system, also shooting sports is not as easy as the Nikon ads on TV suggest :rolleyes: .. so post a few sample shots here with full EXIF as a start.


Newfoundland Wedding Photographer (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
airfrogusmc
I'm a chimper. There I said it...
37,970 posts
Gallery: 179 photos
Best ofs: 6
Likes: 13442
Joined May 2007
Location: Oak Park, Illinois
     
Jun 05, 2010 15:42 |  #11

lankforddl wrote in post #10307694 (external link)
I suspect that your experience with the 70-200 is 1-in-a-million. This lens and the lot of canon 70-200 are the best team of lenses that exist on earth. :-)

I wouldn't go that far. But its not to bad for a zoom. ;)

To the OP, Are you shooting at shutter speeds that are to slow?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nifkin
Senior Member
Avatar
354 posts
Joined Dec 2008
Location: London UK
     
Jun 05, 2010 16:16 |  #12

airfrogusmc wrote in post #10308343 (external link)
But its not to bad for a zoom. ;)

I wouldn't go too far (this time in the other direction) ;)

So you sent this lens back to Canon not once, nor twice, but three - count 'em - three times, and it still doesn't work?

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm. I think something else is afoot....


Nifkin Puffoon

EOS 5D MkIII | EOS 5D MkII | EF 24-105mm f/4.0L IS USM | EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM | EF 85mm f/1.8 USM | Sigma 50mm f/1.4EX DG HSM | Speedlite 600EX RT

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ecub
Goldmember
1,487 posts
Joined May 2010
Location: Southwest suburbs of Chicago
     
Jun 05, 2010 16:17 |  #13

leo_jb wrote in post #10307670 (external link)
I invested in an EF 70-200 f/4 USM lens a while back primarily to take photos of my kids playing soccer. The focus of the photos I took were inconsistent - about half were sharp and half were very soft, blurry even. I thought it was me and played with the settings on the camera, higher shutter speed, etc., to no avail. I finally set the camera and lens up on a tripod and tested it. What do you know - the lens can not focus at 200mm wide open. Just goes from blurry to blurrier (is there such a word?). It gets better at shorter focal lengths and is pretty clear at 135mm. I sent it to Canon (Irvine, CA) for repair, and even though it was just out of warranty, they attempted to fix it for free. Problem is, they never did fix it, even after three tries. I am about to give up. Anyone else ever had this problem? Suggestions on how to proceed?

I'm willing to take it off your hands for the price of some lemonade :D


- Ed
Official Gear List
5D II | 7D | 16-35mm f/2.8L II | 24-70mm f/2.8L | 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II | 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L | 50mm f/1.2L USM | 85mm f/1.2L II | 100mm f/2.8L IS macro

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Overread
Goldmember
Avatar
2,268 posts
Gallery: 12 photos
Likes: 94
Joined Mar 2010
     
Jun 05, 2010 16:17 |  #14

First I do agree your best bet is to post up some examples with the full details of the shots to ensure that user error is not a part of this problem. This is the first step and the cheapest (And quickest).

Secondly - if the above fails to identify a flaw within your shooting methods then I would consider sending the lens back, with your camera body. It might be the case that the lens itself is performing within canons tollerance zones, but when mated to your camera body the two together are not giving images outside of the lenses performance abilities. Supplying the camera body as well - whilst depriving you of it - at least lets canon fully test and calibrate the lens specificially for that body.


Tools of the trade: Canon 400D, Canon 7D, Canon 70-200mm f2.8 IS L M2, Sigma 120-300mm f2.8 OS, Canon MPE 65mm f2.8 macro, Sigma 150mm f2.8 macro, Tamron 24-70mm f2.4, Sigma 70mm f2.8 macro, Sigma 8-16mm f4.5-5.6, Raynox DCR 250, loads of teleconverters and a flashy thingy too
My flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jon ­ Foster
is it safe?
Avatar
4,521 posts
Likes: 39
Joined Feb 2005
Location: White Lake, MI
     
Jun 05, 2010 16:27 |  #15

Have you tried duplicating your test shots with the lens on a different body? What area are you in? I'm sure there are several other photogs in the area that could test it for you.

Jon.


I shoot with a Little Canon

Check out my photos @ PBase.com (external link) & ModelMayhem.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

14,287 views & 0 likes for this thread, 45 members have posted to it and it is followed by 2 members.
"L" stands for lemon
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2862 guests, 156 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.