Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 05 Jun 2010 (Saturday) 12:50
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

"L" stands for lemon

 
Jam.radonc
Goldmember
Avatar
1,187 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Feb 2010
Location: Dublin
     
Jun 05, 2010 17:59 |  #16

versedmb wrote in post #10307915 (external link)
That's really a shame. Its one of my favorite lenses.

Here's mine at f/4...
QUOTED IMAGE

Love the shot :) Great storytelling!


Jam
5D3 | 450D | Panasonic DMC-LX3 | 430 EX II | ST-E2
24-70 L II | 50L | 50 1.8 I | 100L | Zeiss 35/2 ZE | Zeiss 85/2.8 | Zeiss 135/3.5
[COLOR="Silver"]Sold: 17-40L | 24L II | 85L II | 135L | Sigma 50/1.4 | 5D2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
philwillmedia
Cream of the Crop
5,253 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 25
Joined Nov 2008
Location: "...just south of the 23rd Paralell..."
     
Jun 05, 2010 18:00 |  #17

leo_jb wrote in post #10307670 (external link)
I invested in an EF 70-200 f/4 USM lens a while back primarily to take photos of my kids playing soccer. The focus of the photos I took were inconsistent - about half were sharp and half were very soft, blurry even. I thought it was me and played with the settings on the camera, higher shutter speed, etc., to no avail. I finally set the camera and lens up on a tripod and tested it. What do you know - the lens can not focus at 200mm wide open. Just goes from blurry to blurrier (is there such a word?). It gets better at shorter focal lengths and is pretty clear at 135mm. I sent it to Canon (Irvine, CA) for repair, and even though it was just out of warranty, they attempted to fix it for free. Problem is, they never did fix it, even after three tries. I am about to give up. Anyone else ever had this problem? Suggestions on how to proceed?

Photos with EXIF...or it didn't happen


Regards, Phil
2019 South Australian Country Press Assoc Sports Photo of the Year - Runner Up
2018 South Australian Country Press Assoc Sports Photo of the Year
2018 CAMS (now Motorsport Australia) Gold Accredited Photographer
Finallist - 2014 NT Media Awards
"A bad day at the race track is better than a good day in the office"

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
digirebelva
Goldmember
Avatar
3,999 posts
Gallery: 376 photos
Likes: 1687
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Virginia
     
Jun 05, 2010 18:29 as a reply to  @ philwillmedia's post |  #18

Here is one I took at F/4 200mm at iso 800 with mine that I bought second hand. I dont always get non-blurry shots, but I realize that when I do, its my mistake the lens is doing its part

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR

EOS 6d, 7dMKII, Tokina 11-16, Tokina 16-28, Sigma 70-200mm F/2.8, Sigma 17-50 F/2.8, Canon 24-70mm F/2.8L, Canon 70-200 F/2.8L, Mixed Speedlites and other stuff.

When it ceases to be fun, it will be time to walk away
Website (external link) | Fine Art America (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
alpha_1976
Goldmember
Avatar
3,961 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Nov 2009
Location: USA
     
Jun 05, 2010 18:54 |  #19

come back


I know more about gear than I know about photography :p
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
egordon99
Cream of the Crop
10,247 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Philly 'burbs
     
Jun 05, 2010 19:31 |  #20

versedmb wrote in post #10307915 (external link)
That's really a shame. Its one of my favorite lenses.

Here's mine at f/4...
QUOTED IMAGE

AWESOME shot!!!!!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
hsmoscout
Goldmember
Avatar
1,166 posts
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Camera Addicts Anonymous
     
Jun 05, 2010 19:36 |  #21

Definitely strange. The AF on mine is crazy fast, perfect for sports. Yes, sometimes it gets confused, but all lenses will at some time.


My Gear
˙ʇsod uı ʇı xıɟ

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CountryBoy
"Tired of Goldmember label"
Avatar
5,168 posts
Joined May 2006
Location: Okie
     
Jun 05, 2010 20:46 |  #22

mmahoney wrote in post #10308326 (external link)
After 3 trips to Canon repair with a VERY highly regarded lens I would start to consider what else in the image making chain could be causing problems .. test the lens on another body to be sure it's not a fault with the cameras AF system, also shooting sports is not as easy as the Nikon ads on TV suggest :rolleyes: .. so post a few sample shots here with full EXIF as a start.

Yes sports can be tough, but he said he tested it on a tripod and the results where bad also. But you could have a point about the body.

Do you have other lens and do they AF ok ?


Hi

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
corndog ­ cabernet
Senior Member
Avatar
369 posts
Gallery: 74 photos
Likes: 782
Joined May 2010
Location: State of chaos
     
Jun 05, 2010 20:52 as a reply to  @ post 10308543 |  #23

leo_jb wrote in post #10307670 (external link)
What do you know - the lens can not focus at 200mm wide open.

Anyone else ever had this problem? Suggestions on how to proceed?

Mine has the same issue. It back focuses about 12" at 40', carefully measured and re-measured. My brand new EF400 f5.6 front fosed about 6" at 40'. These are both on an XT body.

I spent about 70 minutes with Canon tech peeps about these issues on two different occasions and the story at the end of all this was "send it to Canon Irvine". The problem is they will calibrate the two lenses to that specific body, and will charge you significantly for it. The lenses may or may not be perfectly right for another body after that. It all sounded like a crap shoot anyway as I'd read of people getting their stuff back from Canon and it still not being right.

Looking into it some more, I discovered this is a common issue with longer lenses, wide open, and that there is a calibration fix one can do with a small hex wrench. I did this and now the 400 focuses perfectly while the 70-200 still back focuses a bit at f4.

Canon themselves clearly have acknowledged the issue by now incorporating "micro focus adjust" on the 50D, 7D, and 1 series cameras.

lankforddl wrote in post #10307694 (external link)
I suspect that your experience with the 70-200 is 1-in-a-million. This lens and the lot of canon 70-200 are the best team of lenses that exist on earth. :-)

Slow down Seabisquit! Evangelism isn't what's required here.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
elitejp
Goldmember
1,786 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 211
Joined Mar 2008
     
Jun 05, 2010 21:22 |  #24

Nifkin wrote in post #10308487 (external link)
I wouldn't go too far (this time in the other direction) ;)

So you sent this lens back to Canon not once, nor twice, but three - count 'em - three times, and it still doesn't work?

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm. I think something else is afoot....

Wouldnt Canon have told him the third time he sent it in that the lens was fine rather than attempting to fix it? I dont think anyone in the canon workplace likes just having busywork for no purpose?

But this lens is generally accpeted as a great lens. I hope it gets all worked out in the end.


6D; canon 85mm 1.8, Tamron 24-70mm VC, Canon 135L Canon 70-200L is ii

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Brain ­ Mechanic
Goldmember
Avatar
3,526 posts
Likes: 19
Joined Apr 2010
     
Jun 05, 2010 21:36 |  #25
bannedPermanent ban

Im going to chalk this one up to user error...until more evidence is provided. I mean whats the point of starting this thread without complete evidence to support this nonsensical rant and then just dissappear??


Gear: a toothed wheel :p
"To be of good quality, you have to excuse yourself from the presence of shallow and callow minded individuals" Michael Bassey Johnson
--Oscar--
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
elitejp
Goldmember
1,786 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 211
Joined Mar 2008
     
Jun 05, 2010 21:41 as a reply to  @ Brain Mechanic's post |  #26

LOL. Ya the title is showing a little bit of emotional bad judgement.


6D; canon 85mm 1.8, Tamron 24-70mm VC, Canon 135L Canon 70-200L is ii

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CountryBoy
"Tired of Goldmember label"
Avatar
5,168 posts
Joined May 2006
Location: Okie
     
Jun 05, 2010 21:42 |  #27

Brain Mechanic wrote in post #10309774 (external link)
Im going to chalk this one up to user error...until more evidence is provided. I mean whats the point of starting this thread without complete evidence to support this nonsensical rant and then just dissappear??

How can you chalk it up to that. I'm thinking he bought a used lens that had problems. I can't figure why other people started posting images with their lens.


Hi

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mmahoney
Goldmember
Avatar
2,789 posts
Joined Jan 2007
     
Jun 05, 2010 21:57 |  #28

corndog cabernet wrote in post #10309587 (external link)
I discovered this is a common issue with longer lenses, wide open, and that there is a calibration fix one can do with a small hex wrench.

Is this hex wrench self-calibrating procedure for the body or lens?

I recall seeing online instructions on body calibration which involves a (modified) wrench but have never seen anything about do-it- yourself lens calibration .. I'm sure both are simple procedures once you know what to do and have the tools.

Still, I've seen the guts of a modern lens and can tell you there are a whole lotta wires in there .. not for the faint hearted.


Newfoundland Wedding Photographer (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Saint728
Goldmember
Avatar
2,892 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jun 2009
Location: Honolulu Hawaii
     
Jun 05, 2010 22:04 |  #29

Brain Mechanic wrote in post #10309774 (external link)
Im going to chalk this one up to user error...until more evidence is provided. I mean whats the point of starting this thread without complete evidence to support this nonsensical rant and then just dissappear??

Can you say troll?

Take Care,
Cheers, Patrick


Canon EOS 1Ds Mark III | 17-40mm f/4.0L | 70-200mm f/2.8L USM | 100mm f/2.8L IS Macro | 300mm f/4.0L IS
Click Here To See My Gear
Click here to see my Flickr (external link)
http://www.runryder.co​m/helicopter/gallery/9​019/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
yogestee
"my posts can be a little colourful"
Avatar
13,845 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 41
Joined Dec 2007
Location: Australia
     
Jun 05, 2010 22:05 as a reply to  @ mmahoney's post |  #30

Leo,,is the 70-200mm your first tele zoom??

Long lenses are a whole new experience in shooting than say a wide angle to short zoom.. More care is needed especially at the long end and you have to keep your shutterspeed up.. You'll find that most poor quality images are due to user error and not the lens/camera.. The Canon 70-200mm zooms are outstanding lenses,,second to none..

Post a couple of bloopers..


Jurgen
50D~EOS M50 MkII~EOS M~G11~S95~GoPro Hero4 Silver
http://www.pbase.com/j​urgentreue (external link)
The Title Fairy,, off with her head!!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

14,289 views & 0 likes for this thread, 45 members have posted to it and it is followed by 2 members.
"L" stands for lemon
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2862 guests, 156 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.