That's really a shame. Its one of my favorite lenses.
Here's mine at f/4...

Love the shot
Great storytelling!
Jam.radonc Goldmember 1,187 posts Likes: 2 Joined Feb 2010 Location: Dublin More info | Jun 05, 2010 17:59 | #16 versedmb wrote in post #10307915 That's really a shame. Its one of my favorite lenses. Here's mine at f/4... ![]() Love the shot Jam
LOG IN TO REPLY |
philwillmedia Cream of the Crop 5,253 posts Gallery: 2 photos Likes: 25 Joined Nov 2008 Location: "...just south of the 23rd Paralell..." More info | Jun 05, 2010 18:00 | #17 leo_jb wrote in post #10307670 I invested in an EF 70-200 f/4 USM lens a while back primarily to take photos of my kids playing soccer. The focus of the photos I took were inconsistent - about half were sharp and half were very soft, blurry even. I thought it was me and played with the settings on the camera, higher shutter speed, etc., to no avail. I finally set the camera and lens up on a tripod and tested it. What do you know - the lens can not focus at 200mm wide open. Just goes from blurry to blurrier (is there such a word?). It gets better at shorter focal lengths and is pretty clear at 135mm. I sent it to Canon (Irvine, CA) for repair, and even though it was just out of warranty, they attempted to fix it for free. Problem is, they never did fix it, even after three tries. I am about to give up. Anyone else ever had this problem? Suggestions on how to proceed? Photos with EXIF...or it didn't happen Regards, Phil
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Here is one I took at F/4 200mm at iso 800 with mine that I bought second hand. I dont always get non-blurry shots, but I realize that when I do, its my mistake the lens is doing its part
EOS 6d, 7dMKII, Tokina 11-16, Tokina 16-28, Sigma 70-200mm F/2.8, Sigma 17-50 F/2.8, Canon 24-70mm F/2.8L, Canon 70-200 F/2.8L, Mixed Speedlites and other stuff.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
alpha_1976 Goldmember 3,961 posts Likes: 1 Joined Nov 2009 Location: USA More info | Jun 05, 2010 18:54 | #19 |
egordon99 Cream of the Crop 10,247 posts Likes: 3 Joined Feb 2008 Location: Philly 'burbs More info | Jun 05, 2010 19:31 | #20 versedmb wrote in post #10307915 That's really a shame. Its one of my favorite lenses. Here's mine at f/4... ![]() AWESOME shot!!!!!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
hsmoscout Goldmember 1,166 posts Joined Oct 2009 Location: Camera Addicts Anonymous More info | Jun 05, 2010 19:36 | #21 Definitely strange. The AF on mine is crazy fast, perfect for sports. Yes, sometimes it gets confused, but all lenses will at some time. My Gear
LOG IN TO REPLY |
CountryBoy "Tired of Goldmember label" 5,168 posts Joined May 2006 Location: Okie More info | Jun 05, 2010 20:46 | #22 mmahoney wrote in post #10308326 After 3 trips to Canon repair with a VERY highly regarded lens I would start to consider what else in the image making chain could be causing problems .. test the lens on another body to be sure it's not a fault with the cameras AF system, also shooting sports is not as easy as the Nikon ads on TV suggest .. so post a few sample shots here with full EXIF as a start.Yes sports can be tough, but he said he tested it on a tripod and the results where bad also. But you could have a point about the body. Hi
LOG IN TO REPLY |
leo_jb wrote in post #10307670 What do you know - the lens can not focus at 200mm wide open. Anyone else ever had this problem? Suggestions on how to proceed? Mine has the same issue. It back focuses about 12" at 40', carefully measured and re-measured. My brand new EF400 f5.6 front fosed about 6" at 40'. These are both on an XT body. lankforddl wrote in post #10307694 I suspect that your experience with the 70-200 is 1-in-a-million. This lens and the lot of canon 70-200 are the best team of lenses that exist on earth. ![]() Slow down Seabisquit! Evangelism isn't what's required here.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 05, 2010 21:22 | #24 Nifkin wrote in post #10308487 I wouldn't go too far (this time in the other direction) ![]() So you sent this lens back to Canon not once, nor twice, but three - count 'em - three times, and it still doesn't work? Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm. I think something else is afoot.... Wouldnt Canon have told him the third time he sent it in that the lens was fine rather than attempting to fix it? I dont think anyone in the canon workplace likes just having busywork for no purpose? 6D; canon 85mm 1.8, Tamron 24-70mm VC, Canon 135L Canon 70-200L is ii
LOG IN TO REPLY |
BrainMechanic Goldmember 3,526 posts Likes: 19 Joined Apr 2010 More info | Jun 05, 2010 21:36 | #25 Permanent banIm going to chalk this one up to user error...until more evidence is provided. I mean whats the point of starting this thread without complete evidence to support this nonsensical rant and then just dissappear?? Gear: a toothed wheel
LOG IN TO REPLY |
LOL. Ya the title is showing a little bit of emotional bad judgement. 6D; canon 85mm 1.8, Tamron 24-70mm VC, Canon 135L Canon 70-200L is ii
LOG IN TO REPLY |
CountryBoy "Tired of Goldmember label" 5,168 posts Joined May 2006 Location: Okie More info | Jun 05, 2010 21:42 | #27 Brain Mechanic wrote in post #10309774 Im going to chalk this one up to user error...until more evidence is provided. I mean whats the point of starting this thread without complete evidence to support this nonsensical rant and then just dissappear?? How can you chalk it up to that. I'm thinking he bought a used lens that had problems. I can't figure why other people started posting images with their lens. Hi
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mmahoney Goldmember 2,789 posts Joined Jan 2007 More info | Jun 05, 2010 21:57 | #28 corndog cabernet wrote in post #10309587 I discovered this is a common issue with longer lenses, wide open, and that there is a calibration fix one can do with a small hex wrench. Is this hex wrench self-calibrating procedure for the body or lens? Newfoundland Wedding Photographer
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Saint728 Goldmember 2,892 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jun 2009 Location: Honolulu Hawaii More info | Jun 05, 2010 22:04 | #29 Brain Mechanic wrote in post #10309774 Im going to chalk this one up to user error...until more evidence is provided. I mean whats the point of starting this thread without complete evidence to support this nonsensical rant and then just dissappear?? Can you say troll? Canon EOS 1Ds Mark III | 17-40mm f/4.0L | 70-200mm f/2.8L USM | 100mm f/2.8L IS Macro | 300mm f/4.0L IS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
yogestee "my posts can be a little colourful" More info | Leo,,is the 70-200mm your first tele zoom?? Jurgen
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2862 guests, 156 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||