Just priced a Canon 10-22 for $849 and a Sigma 10-20 for like $500. Naturally the Sigma is out of stock, but the Canon is in stock.
Not sure if I sure get one of these or a prime 30. But I really wanted a UWA
tawcat Senior Member 433 posts Joined Mar 2009 Location: Cammack Village, Arkansas More info | Jun 07, 2010 14:46 | #1 Just priced a Canon 10-22 for $849 and a Sigma 10-20 for like $500. Naturally the Sigma is out of stock, but the Canon is in stock. Yes, a picture really is worth a thousand words!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Brennan.M Goldmember 2,599 posts Likes: 3 Joined Jul 2008 Location: Cookeville, TN More info | Jun 07, 2010 14:51 | #2 |
DrLazarus Senior Member 711 posts Likes: 63 Joined May 2010 More info | Jun 07, 2010 14:52 | #3 Why is the 10-22 $849? Where are you looking?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jp129 Senior Member 294 posts Joined May 2010 Location: TEXAS More info | Jun 07, 2010 14:58 | #4 Used 10-22's will run anywhere from $600.00-$650.00 depending on condition and accessories included. DRIVER > GLASS > BODY
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Lee Senior Member 472 posts Joined Oct 2009 More info | Jun 07, 2010 14:59 | #5 The Sigma is $467 on Amazon. I am sure you can find it a bit cheaper elsewhere if you do a little digging.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 07, 2010 15:07 | #6 Got the 10-22 from adorama several weeks ago and only paid $700 for it. I'm sure you can get it cheaper than $849! My Gear: 6D, 7D, EOS-M w EF-M 22 f2 STM and EF-M 18-55 f3.5-5.6 IS STM, 17-40L f4, 24-70L f2.8, 100 f2.8 non-IS macro, 70-200L f/4 IS, 400L f5.6,, Canon 1.4x II TC, Canon Speedlite 430 EX II, Better Beamer. Manfrotto carbon fiber tripod, 2 monopods, Manfrotto ballhead and pistol grip tripod heads.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tawcat THREAD STARTER Senior Member 433 posts Joined Mar 2009 Location: Cammack Village, Arkansas More info | Jun 07, 2010 15:11 | #7 Is any one of them better than the other? Yes, a picture really is worth a thousand words!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Viva-photography Goldmember 1,447 posts Likes: 2 Joined Feb 2010 Location: Washington, DC More info | Jun 07, 2010 15:15 | #9 Sigma's quality control is famously not so hot.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
wcgryphon Member 122 posts Joined Nov 2009 More info | Don't forget to add in Bing Cashback while you still can (Ends 7/30).
LOG IN TO REPLY |
sctbiggs Goldmember 1,793 posts Joined Jun 2009 Location: North Carolina More info | Jun 07, 2010 15:20 | #11 thinking of selling our 10-22, canon UV filter, and canon hood... Baby Girl 2.0 has arrived!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tawcat THREAD STARTER Senior Member 433 posts Joined Mar 2009 Location: Cammack Village, Arkansas More info | Jun 07, 2010 15:24 | #12 sctbiggs: thanks I'll think about that. Still trying to decide if I want to really go with a UWA or a prime. Yes, a picture really is worth a thousand words!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
theextremist04 Goldmember 1,224 posts Joined Feb 2010 Location: Kansas City More info | Jun 07, 2010 15:28 | #13 Viva-photography wrote in post #10319290 Sigma's quality control is famously not so hot. There's a chance you'll get a lens with focus problems,etc.. Yeah, far less than a 10% chance. Don't overestimate the problem; most people don't have issues. -Michael
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mckinleypics Goldmember 1,809 posts Likes: 5 Joined Jan 2010 Location: Minnesota More info | Jun 07, 2010 15:31 | #14 Have you considered looking at the Tokina 11-16 f/2.8? Also $700. Dave
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Niagara Wedding Photographer 1333 guests, 109 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||