So why is it again that Amazon has removed this from their site? Someone earlier said because of these forums, but everyone here seems happy with this lens. Also 47stphoto seems to be out of these on ebay.
trekker007 Hatchling 1 post Joined Mar 2011 More info | So why is it again that Amazon has removed this from their site? Someone earlier said because of these forums, but everyone here seems happy with this lens. Also 47stphoto seems to be out of these on ebay.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jptsr1 Goldmember  1,846 posts Gallery: 4 photos Likes: 116 Joined Sep 2006 Location: From The Bronx NY but living in Singapore More info | Mar 29, 2011 23:20 | #467 trekker007 wrote in post #12121335  So why is it again that Amazon has removed this from their site? Someone earlier said because of these forums, but everyone here seems happy with this lens. Also 47stphoto seems to be out of these on ebay. I believe Amazon has a set trigger for removing an item when a certain percentage of them ar returned. I bought my lens from them but have had no issues with it other than the hood dosent appear to fit all that tight. Et Facta Est Lux
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 30, 2011 08:25 | #468 trekker007 wrote in post #12121335 So why is it again that Amazon has removed this from their site? Because Amazon is retarded. Nikon D750 || Nikon 24-120mm f/4G ED VR || Nikon 50mm f/1.8G || Tamron SP 150-600mm f/5-6.3 Di VC USD
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 30, 2011 15:22 | #469 They might be retarded but when you buy direct from Amazon dont you like there " NO Questions Asked Return Policy " which even includes free return shipping ! Silverfox1 POTN Feedback / TC Extender Tests / Gear List
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Tony-S Cream of the Crop  9,911 posts Likes: 209 Joined Jan 2006 Location: Fort Collins, Colorado, USA More info | Less talk, more pics. "Raw" is not an acronym, abbreviation, nor a proper noun; thus, it should not be in capital letters.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 30, 2011 19:50 | #471 Silverfox1 wrote in post #12126003 They might be retarded but when you buy direct from Amazon dont you like there " NO Questions Asked Return Policy " which even includes free return shipping !  Regards,  Yeah I suppose I'd like that had I ever bought anything from Amazon. Nikon D750 || Nikon 24-120mm f/4G ED VR || Nikon 50mm f/1.8G || Tamron SP 150-600mm f/5-6.3 Di VC USD
LOG IN TO REPLY |
illusiumd Member  62 posts Joined Nov 2010 More info | This worries me too. I hope I didn't jump on this lens' train too soon. Even though I'm happy with mine, it doesn't make me feel good to know that people may be returning this lens at a rate which triggers amazon to stop selling it. Were the early reviews overly effusive? All the daylight pics look fab, I'd like to see some more low light pics with it wide open. 550d. Canon 70-200 f4 L, Canon 17-55 f2.8
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 30, 2011 21:17 | #473 illusiumd wrote in post #12128310 This worries me too. I hope I didn't jump on this lens' train too soon. Even though I'm happy with mine, it doesn't make me feel good to know that people may be returning this lens at a rate which triggers amazon to stop selling it. Were the early reviews overly effusive? All the daylight pics look fab, I'd like to see some more low light pics with it wide open. Doesn't appear that Amazon has stopped selling it? Still there when I search for it: http://www.amazon.com …TF8&qid=1301537661&sr=8-2 Fuji X-T1 | Fuji 18-55 f/2.8-4 | Fuji 35 f/1.4
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jptsr1 Goldmember 1,846 posts Gallery: 4 photos Likes: 116 Joined Sep 2006 Location: From The Bronx NY but living in Singapore More info | Mar 30, 2011 21:28 | #474 deronsizemore wrote in post #12128353 Doesn't appear that Amazon has stopped selling it? Still there when I search for it: http://www.amazon.com …TF8&qid=1301537661&sr=8-2 Anyway, I love this lens. It's really sharp at f/2.8 as well, just seems to be crystal clear at f/4. I'm a hobbyist at best with Photography, but it's my understanding that all lenses are like this? Where stopping down a stop or two will render sharper pictures? currently you can only buy it from other sellers through Amazon, not from Amazon. Et Facta Est Lux
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jptsr1 Goldmember 1,846 posts Gallery: 4 photos Likes: 116 Joined Sep 2006 Location: From The Bronx NY but living in Singapore More info | Mar 30, 2011 21:31 | #475 illusiumd wrote in post #12128310 This worries me too. I hope I didn't jump on this lens' train too soon. Even though I'm happy with mine, it doesn't make me feel good to know that people may be returning this lens at a rate which triggers amazon to stop selling it. Were the early reviews overly effusive? All the daylight pics look fab, I'd like to see some more low light pics with it wide open. to paraphrase Muhammad Ali, whatever effusive means if its good im that. only thing that matters is you are happy with yours. Et Facta Est Lux
LOG IN TO REPLY |
illusiumd Member 62 posts Joined Nov 2010 More info |
by McWeerd, on Flickr35mm -- f2.8-- 1/30-- 1600 Iso -- no PostP I am happy, I need to spend more time shooting and less time reading 550d. Canon 70-200 f4 L, Canon 17-55 f2.8
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jptsr1 Goldmember 1,846 posts Gallery: 4 photos Likes: 116 Joined Sep 2006 Location: From The Bronx NY but living in Singapore More info |
Mar 30, 2011 22:33 | #478 illusiumd wrote in post #12128310 This worries me too. I hope I didn't jump on this lens' train too soon. Even though I'm happy with mine, it doesn't make me feel good to know that people may be returning this lens at a rate which triggers amazon to stop selling it. Were the early reviews overly effusive? All the daylight pics look fab, I'd like to see some more low light pics with it wide open. I wouldnt worry too much since Amazon is still selling the Nikon & Sony version of this lens direct from Amazon: Silverfox1 POTN Feedback / TC Extender Tests / Gear List
LOG IN TO REPLY |
xsouthpawed Hatchling 4 posts Joined Jan 2011 More info | i might be able to sell my canon 28-135mm to get this lens! (or some other form of wide-angle)
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Broomer Senior Member  More info | Test photos with new lens.. dog at 50mm and 2.8 landscape at 17mm and f8  HOSTED PHOTO please log in to view hosted photos in full size.  HOSTED PHOTO please log in to view hosted photos in full size. Paul
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is IoDaLi Photography 1648 guests, 142 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
