I tried out a new editing process and I'm trying to get some feedback - good or bad... images are links to flickr for larger viewing.
1.
2.
Thanks for looking
alsoscott Member  112 posts Joined Jan 2008 Location: Phoenix, Az More info | Jun 12, 2010 01:48 | #1 I tried out a new editing process and I'm trying to get some feedback - good or bad... images are links to flickr for larger viewing. 2. Thanks for looking AlsoScott
LOG IN TO REPLY |
photoPanda Senior Member  616 posts Joined May 2010 Location: East Coast More info | Jun 12, 2010 01:50 | #2 Her teeth leap out of the photo at me - they're perhaps a little white
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 12, 2010 01:58 | #3 promise I didn't brighten then that much, they are/were pretty bright already, I just cleaned them up a little AlsoScott
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TBath Member 113 posts Joined Oct 2009 Location: South Jordan, Utah More info | Jun 12, 2010 02:10 | #4 You must have used the "make teeth too white" tool. 7D Gripped
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 12, 2010 02:20 | #5 TBath wrote in post #10347618 You must have used the "make teeth too white" tool.  Otherwise the pictures are good. I guess I need to find the "make teeth not so white" tool haha AlsoScott
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gnaw Member  63 posts Joined May 2010 Location: Scarborough, T.O. More info | I think the faces are brushed too much and looks a little soft, they're missing a little detail. But great photos!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
The images are nice, but the subject is way over processed IMO. Nikon D810 Nikon 50F/1.4G - Nikon 70-200F/2.8II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
f1nut Senior Member More info | Jun 12, 2010 04:28 | #8 drdiesel1 wrote in post #10347723 The images are nice, but the subject is way over processed IMO. I agree with the above sorry. I really like them other wise. The second one being my favorite. The wife says I never listen or something like that.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
CherithK Member 48 posts Joined May 2010 More info | Jun 12, 2010 05:56 | #9 I like the second one, although it does make me want a Mentos for some reason... "A true photograph need not be explained, nor can it be contained in words." -Ansel Adams
LOG IN TO REPLY |
bobbyz Cream of the Crop 20,506 posts Likes: 3479 Joined Nov 2007 Location: Bay Area, CA More info | Jun 12, 2010 10:47 | #10 too much pp. Fuji XT-1, 18-55mm
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 12, 2010 11:15 | #11 Thanks all for the input, I'll see if I can tone them down a bit. Thanks a bunch! AlsoScott
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 12, 2010 11:24 | #12 after a quick look back in Lightroom, I think some of the loss of details, and the over processing look actually came from too much noise reduction within LR... I go back to the RAW file and reduce the noise reduction and some of the details come back into the face and skin... AlsoScott
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jhuse Senior Member 349 posts Joined Jan 2008 Location: Cassville, MO More info | Jun 12, 2010 21:18 | #14 Was the second one shot in Fayettville?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mathogre Goldmember  More info | The second one is my favorite, but full size I see lots of bad artifacts in her hair and aliasing artifacts on her arms. Her eyes look over-processed. They really detract from an otherwise well composed photo of a very attractive and photogenic young woman. Graham
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 1573 guests, 176 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
