Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 13 Jun 2010 (Sunday) 05:52
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Microadjustment for Sigma 50

 
fidens
Member
64 posts
Joined Dec 2009
     
Jun 13, 2010 05:52 |  #1

My Sigma 50 appears to be back focussing a tad on my 5DM2, so I set about trying to microadjust the AF using the method of shooting (from a tripod) from -20 to +20 in 5 step increments and checking the shots before refining.

Problem is, the focal point doesn't seem to be changing at all; the shots look effectively identical, even the -20 and the +20. What am I doing wrong? I am shooting black text on white at a pretty close range and at wide aperture. Is this the issue?

Grateful for any tips.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MGiddings ­ Photography
Senior Member
Avatar
964 posts
Likes: 10
Joined Mar 2010
Location: Norwich, Norfolk, UK
     
Jun 13, 2010 06:10 |  #2

Try setting up in live view on a tripod and use manual focus and to see if you can get a sharp focus. Maybe the lens needs to head back to the shop.


https://mgiddings.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dengar
Senior Member
987 posts
Joined Mar 2005
     
Jun 13, 2010 13:11 |  #3

I cant find a picture of it but you can try the battery test. Line up 5 batteries next to each other diagonally from near to far. Focus on the center battery and see if its focus.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mr. ­ Unknown
Member
93 posts
Joined May 2010
     
Jun 13, 2010 13:20 |  #4

AF microadjustment capability, which means that you can adjust the auto-focusing of each lens individually, in the camera, if they happen to front- or back-focus a little bit. The problem is that you can never get it quite right because the focusing typically varies slightly for each focus point. (You may get it exactly sharp for the center focus point, but then find it is still off for the far left focus point.) I feel that if you need an excessive amount of AF microadjustment, you should probably send the camera or lens back for repair, calibration, or replacement. Personally, if I were using a non-L-series lens, I wouldn’t worry about a few mm of front- or back-focusing. And if I were using an L-series lens that didn’t focus dead on, I would send it back to Canon for recalibration – which in fact is something I have done.

from: http://dojoklo.wordpre​ss.com …-7d-vs-5d-vs-50d-part-ii/ (external link)

Maybe you just have to send it in.. ;)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jeremytf
Member
212 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Apr 2010
     
Jun 13, 2010 13:24 |  #5

fidens wrote in post #10352428 (external link)
at a pretty close range

What is "pretty close range" mean exactly? Farther is better.


Gear, Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gjl711
Wait.. you can't unkill your own kill.
Avatar
57,730 posts
Likes: 4065
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Deep in the heart of Texas
     
Jun 13, 2010 13:25 |  #6

Need more info. How are you testing this? What settings? You want to do this with the lens wide open. Also, whats your target. I have found that shooting a ISO resolution chart works great as you can clearly see when the lens is resolving at the max. ALso, what distance are you? Canon recommends 50x the focal length.

Try shooting this chart. Print it out on 11x17 of possible, set up up 2.5 meters away (about 8 feet) and repeat you test. If you look at the gradations in the chart, you'll see when it is max resolving. Here is a chart to print out.
http://www.graphics.co​rnell.edu/~westin/misc​/res-chart.html (external link)

Looks like this.

This is my Canon 400mm forst a zero MFA than at +10.

IMAGE: http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2662/4151855506_94a5f719c8_o.jpg

Not sure why, but call me JJ.
I used to hate math but then I realised decimals have a point.
.
::Flickr:: (external link)
::Gear::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
fidens
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
64 posts
Joined Dec 2009
     
Jun 15, 2010 08:15 |  #7

Thanks for the tips all, much appreciated.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Hamfist
Senior Member
Avatar
378 posts
Joined Dec 2009
Location: Imported from Detroit
     
Jun 15, 2010 09:35 |  #8

I just got a Sigmalux late last week and spent about 2 hrs checking focus. I used both the focus chart method and the method espoused on Northlight Images. The latter I couldn't get to work for the life of me. The best I could do was to get the autofocus to move very slightly when going from MF to AF, but I could not get it to stay still. With the chart, it front focused at just outside of MFD at f1.4. At +8 its pretty good. From what I've read, the DOF is not symmetric; i.e., assuming 'DOF' is 4cm total, it may be +1.8 and -2.2 from the point of focus. If this is the case then I guess I'm OK with that. With non-test shots at MFD, wide open, I still get some completely OOF shots, but I think a few are acceptable. Some others are really quite sharp wide open. I'm going to go on vacation next week and this lens is going to live on my Mark III. When I get back I'll check out my shots and make the decision whether to send it into Sigma for calibration.


Film, suckers.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,412 views & 0 likes for this thread, 7 members have posted to it.
Microadjustment for Sigma 50
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is SteveeY
1763 guests, 177 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.