I'm wondering how I would take flat frames for use with DeepSkyStacker? It talked about using a t-shirt and lighting it somehow. Do I stretch it over the lens and light it?
seanesopenko Member 87 posts Joined Feb 2010 Location: Calgary, Canada More info | Jun 14, 2010 14:43 | #1 I'm wondering how I would take flat frames for use with DeepSkyStacker? It talked about using a t-shirt and lighting it somehow. Do I stretch it over the lens and light it? http://www.seanesopenko.ca
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DavidRansley Senior Member More info | Jun 14, 2010 15:31 | #2 Seeing that you are only interested in vignetting you may try this. I did after a few different attempts and this one seems to work well for me. Quickly back to the T-shirt idea. As I understand, this is done by stretching the shirt over the front and taking a shot through the white T-shirt. Due to the shutter speed you will over expose and only see vignetting. Here is what I did: DRH
LOG IN TO REPLY |
by my understanding, since stars are a "point" light source, the f-stop the photograph is taken at doesn't affect the visibility of the star to the stacking software. http://www.seanesopenko.ca
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DonR Senior Member 262 posts Likes: 4 Joined Dec 2009 Location: Georgia, USA More info | Jun 14, 2010 20:09 | #4 Regarding the white t-shirt, the proper technique is to hold a double layer over the lens, smooth out any wrinkles, and point the camera at an evenly illuminated field. The evenly illuminated field part is the key - the sky on an overcast day works, and a clear blue sky could work too if your focal length is fairly long. Trying to illuminate the t-shirt evenly with a flashlight, etc. will probably not work. You may have luck using a white wall or ceiling, but it can be surprisingly difficult to find such a background that's really evenly illuminated.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 14, 2010 21:57 | #5 DonR wrote in post #10362462 Regarding the white t-shirt, the proper technique is to hold a double layer over the lens, smooth out any wrinkles, and point the camera at an evenly illuminated field. The evenly illuminated field part is the key - the sky on an overcast day works, and a clear blue sky could work too if your focal length is fairly long. Trying to illuminate the t-shirt evenly with a flashlight, etc. will probably not work. You may have luck using a white wall or ceiling, but it can be surprisingly difficult to find such a background that's really evenly illuminated. You should use the same f-stop and focal length to acquire your flats as you use for your lights. It is important that the exposure for the flats be such that no part of the flat field image is saturated and no part is black. Setting the camera to AV mode and letting it determine the exposure time automatically works well. Exposure times for flats will typically be well under one second. I have had success using the white t-shirt with clear blue skies, but using a 1000mm telescope, not a camera lens. My preferred method is to use the twilight sky, about 15 to 20 minutes after sunset, pointing the camera about 45 degrees above the horizon in the southeast, and no t-shirt is needed for this method. With this technique too a long lens helps achieve even illumination. Regarding stars being a point source, thus making f/ratio irrelevant, this is a myth. The assumption here is that all the photons from a star that arrive at your camera's sensor travel along a single line. If this were true, you could only see a given star when standing in one exact position on the earth - move a foot left or right and you wouldn't see it. We all know this isn't the case, of course. Photons from a given star enter the lens or telescope at every point on it's aperture, so the larger the aperture, the more photons are captured, and the brighter the star image. With telescopes, this means larger telescopes yield brighter star images in the same exposure time, regardless of the focal ratio. With camera lenses, the aperture is determined by the f-stop setting, so it does matter. Don Wow, extremely informative. Thanks for the information. I finished building a scotch mount so I want to see if I can stretch my photos to 1 or 2 minute exposures. The weather should clear up friday so I'll give it another shot then. I actually did a little research too and I plan on not simply "pointing the camera at an interesting part of the sky" lol. I looked up what should be visible in my neck of the woods this time of year. http://www.seanesopenko.ca
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is ealarcon 1136 guests, 161 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||