Infrared Landscape...

Shot with my Canon Rebel XT that has been converted to infrared.

HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR

Not working for me, it seems overexposed and flat in dimension? Shouldn't there be more contrast being infra red?

I suppose I could up the contrast a bit.
heres another from that day.
Also I was there for the Canon company picnic which was fun. My boyfriend works for Canon.

HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR

You can post them larger....

Flo wrote in post #10366872
You can post them larger....

...Yes I am capable of doing that though this is the size I normally post. =P

Larger:

HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR

HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR

Its just that with this forum, we like to see the photo larger, so we can actually see what it looks like, here are the posting sizes...
https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=51050

sarahashleyphotos wrote in post #10365524
Shot with my Canon Rebel XT that has been converted to infrared.

I cant wait to get the Canon 10-22mm for wider IR landscapes.

Sorry, but not working much for me either. Seems lacking in contrast. Sorta dull. Try a levels adjust and some fine adjustments with curves, etc.

As a side note, you might want to check with the company that did your conversion before purchasing that lens. Don't know if they still do, but Lifepixel, for one, recommends against using that one specific lens. Seems they just can't tune it to the IR focal plane. They used to have something on their website about it, but I don't know if they still do.

And I do not know if other conversion services also recommend against it. If you do use it, you may have to shoot f11 and above to get good focus.