Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
Thread started 20 Jun 2010 (Sunday) 09:53
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

does anyone use a flash bracket anymore?

 
sapearl
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
16,946 posts
Gallery: 243 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 2873
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
     
Jun 20, 2010 19:36 |  #16

cdifoto wrote in post #10396411 (external link)
I use mine at weddings because it maintains the position of my bounce (essentially rotating the camera) without having to turn the flash head itself all the time. Most brackets are poorly designed and you end up fiddling with the flash all day anyway, which makes THOSE useless, IMHO......

Yessir .... +1 on that. I bought my Newton camera rotator back in 2006 and use it at every wedding and social event. Mine puts the flash head about 4" above the lens, and gives some very nice modelling. Here are a few shots of my setup:

https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=338933

I still bounce my flash indoors but it's the rotation and being able to keep the flash top-dead-center to the lens that is the main use Crissa.

Bryan, a number of folks here have either stopped using them or never did. A fair number still do. It's not quite the religious argument of filter vs. no filter.... just usually headbutts into discussions of diffusers and other so-called light modifiers that claim to completely function the way a bracket does - which of course is not true.


GEAR LIST
MY WEBSITE (external link)- MY GALLERIES (external link)- MY BLOG (external link)
Artists Archives of the Western Reserve (external link) - Board

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cdifoto
Don't get pissy with me
Avatar
34,090 posts
Likes: 44
Joined Dec 2005
     
Jun 20, 2010 20:39 |  #17

Yep I bought mine because I want to maintain my lighting in verticals AND horizontals...even when bouncing. You don't need a bracket just to bounce, but the right bracket makes it easier to keep your flash's position and therefore the directionality of the light you're bouncing.


Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here (external link). Cursing at your worse-than-a-map reflector? Check out this vid! (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sapearl
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
16,946 posts
Gallery: 243 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 2873
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
     
Jun 20, 2010 20:47 |  #18

Some go with the camera rotator model.... others like the flash rotator units. I was a little bit concerned about the torque force that would be applied to the foot of the older 580ex as a possible "week point," so I opted for the camera rotator model.


GEAR LIST
MY WEBSITE (external link)- MY GALLERIES (external link)- MY BLOG (external link)
Artists Archives of the Western Reserve (external link) - Board

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Shooting
Goldmember
Avatar
1,552 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Jan 2008
     
Jun 20, 2010 21:20 |  #19

SuzyView wrote in post #10396584 (external link)
I use a sto-fen one some of the time. Depends on the room and the situation. I do try with or without it. But it's a nice bracket. I have this one:

http://www.amazon.com …ics&qid=1277073​518&sr=1-4 (external link)

Why do I like it? It's lightweight, the camera is very solidly on it, I can put it on a tripod and it's not awful to carry around all day long.

Looks good but all the weight of carrying the thing around is still on the left hand/arm and I'm not a hulk hogan or 30 years old anymore :(

So I'm trying to find a way to get good, non-harsh lighting where I can't bounce.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Jun 20, 2010 21:28 |  #20

Shooting wrote in post #10397448 (external link)
Looks good but all the weight of carrying the thing around is still on the left hand/arm and I'm not a hulk hogan or 30 years old anymore :(

So I'm trying to find a way to get good, non-harsh lighting where I can't bounce.

Off camera flash.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RT ­ McAllister
Senior Member
973 posts
Joined Nov 2009
     
Jun 20, 2010 22:22 |  #21

Shooting wrote in post #10397448 (external link)
So I'm trying to find a way to get good, non-harsh lighting where I can't bounce.



Off camera flash is nice but many times unrealistic. I don't have time to drag a light stand around nor do I use assistants.


Google the Demb flip-it. It does very well when direct flash seems like your only alternative, like outdoors for example.

It does a good job when shooting up close and does take the "sting" out of the shadows. But at long distances, and just like most modifiers it doesn't do anything except waste light.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CyberDyneSystems
Admin (type T-2000)
Avatar
52,922 posts
Gallery: 193 photos
Likes: 10114
Joined Apr 2003
Location: Rhode Island USA
     
Jun 20, 2010 22:28 |  #22

Pretty much the only time I use a flash, it's on a bracket,. Wimberly,. but that;s for long range bird photography. no bounce!

It's funny that the trend has changed, given the amount of time effort money and ingenuity that seems to go into these erector set flash brackets!


GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
Jake Hegnauer Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Jun 20, 2010 22:48 |  #23

Off camera flash is something a professional should understand, and should probably use if direct flash is your only other alternative. Yes you need another person, an assistant or someone from the wedding if you must, but the results are worth it.

No on-camera diffuser is particularly effective.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cdifoto
Don't get pissy with me
Avatar
34,090 posts
Likes: 44
Joined Dec 2005
     
Jun 20, 2010 23:26 |  #24

Sometimes I'll settle for direct flash. I don't have it in me to ask someone from the wedding to set up my lights. They probably wouldn't know what to do anyway.

Keep it from blowing over in the wind, sure. I've had the officiant do that much before. :D


Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here (external link). Cursing at your worse-than-a-map reflector? Check out this vid! (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sapearl
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
16,946 posts
Gallery: 243 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 2873
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
     
Jun 21, 2010 05:50 |  #25

CyberDyneSystems wrote in post #10397799 (external link)
Pretty much the only time I use a flash, it's on a bracket,. Wimberly,. but that;s for long range bird photography. no bounce!

It's funny that the trend has changed, given the amount of time effort money and ingenuity that seems to go into these erector set flash brackets!

Has the trend really changed? I honestly don't know - we see some comments to that effect here, but anytime I do weddings at other large multi-event venues with other photographers, I still see brackets in strong use. Maybe it's just a Midwest thing....;)


GEAR LIST
MY WEBSITE (external link)- MY GALLERIES (external link)- MY BLOG (external link)
Artists Archives of the Western Reserve (external link) - Board

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SuzyView
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
32,094 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 129
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Northern VA
     
Jun 21, 2010 05:59 |  #26

I like off camera flash a lot, but it sometimes is not available and my 2 assistants are trainees. Most reception halls will allow stands, if asked in advance. And you should be fully insured as anything can fall on you or anyone else.


Suzie - Still Speaking Canonese!
RF6 Mii, 5DIV, SONY a7iii, 7D2, G12, 6 L's & 2 Primes, 25 bags.
My children and grandchildren are the reason, but it's the passion that drives me to get the perfect image of everything.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Shooting
Goldmember
Avatar
1,552 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Jan 2008
     
Jun 21, 2010 09:50 |  #27

RT McAllister wrote in post #10397771 (external link)
Off camera flash is nice but many times unrealistic. I don't have time to drag a light stand around nor do I use assistants.

Google the Demb flip-it. It does very well when direct flash seems like your only alternative, like outdoors for example.

It does a good job when shooting up close and does take the "sting" out of the shadows. But at long distances, and just like most modifiers it doesn't do anything except waste light.

I have the flipit and the results are very much less desired for me. When I have to back up and shoot a group the flipit doesn't "push" enough light forward to light up the group and plus it gives side shadows just like the lightsphere. Since I cannot afford to pay any assistants, it is just me and my 580exII and that is it. Direct flash many times is too harsh and too easy to blow highlights in the dress but it keeps the shadows behind the people, almost non-noticeable.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sapearl
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
16,946 posts
Gallery: 243 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 2873
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
     
Jun 21, 2010 12:32 |  #28

Shooting wrote in post #10400063 (external link)
I have the flipit and the results are very much less desired for me. When I have to back up and shoot a group the flipit doesn't "push" enough light forward to light up the group and plus it gives side shadows just like the lightsphere. ......

If you are getting side shadows, then it sounds like you still have have the flash unit either to the left or right of lens.

Also, I'm not sure how it's supposed to "push" more light forward either.... it's just a bracket, and unless it provides a magnifying lens for the flash, it will only raise it up and not increase it's power. If your flash is falling off then you either need to get a more powerful unit, raise your ISO, or use a larger aperture as just a couple of suggestions.


GEAR LIST
MY WEBSITE (external link)- MY GALLERIES (external link)- MY BLOG (external link)
Artists Archives of the Western Reserve (external link) - Board

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cdifoto
Don't get pissy with me
Avatar
34,090 posts
Likes: 44
Joined Dec 2005
     
Jun 21, 2010 12:55 |  #29

Hey Sta, the FlipIt is a fancy adjustable catchlight card. It's not a bracket. :)


Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here (external link). Cursing at your worse-than-a-map reflector? Check out this vid! (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sapearl
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
16,946 posts
Gallery: 243 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 2873
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
     
Jun 21, 2010 13:12 |  #30

cdifoto wrote in post #10401236 (external link)
Hey Sta, the FlipIt is a fancy adjustable catchlight card. It's not a bracket. :)

Right - I got that part. I'm just confused about how Shooting is using it or what his expectations are. I don't own one myself, but it's actually a pretty decent product that does what it promises..... nothing more nothing less.;)

The pro who shot both of my daughter's weddings uses it, but in combination with one of those Custom Brackets (camera rotator model.) It did a very nice job of evening out the light, filling in eyes, minimizing hot spots ..... eliminating shadows - but again he's using it with a rotating bracket, and typically not beyond about 12-15' max due to the fall off. He also got very evenly lighted table shots with it.


GEAR LIST
MY WEBSITE (external link)- MY GALLERIES (external link)- MY BLOG (external link)
Artists Archives of the Western Reserve (external link) - Board

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

8,898 views & 0 likes for this thread, 16 members have posted to it.
does anyone use a flash bracket anymore?
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1611 guests, 141 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.