AWGD8 Goldmember  1,021 posts Likes: 1 Joined Aug 2009 Location: SE WI More info | Jun 20, 2010 19:58 | #1 I`m just wondering if anyone here has this LENS BODY COMBO?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
alemerson Member 56 posts Joined May 2010 More info | Jun 20, 2010 20:07 | #2 So these aren't from a 7D. They are from my Xti, which has a similar 1.6x crop sensor. Both at 16mm at f/2.8   5D Mark II | 16-35L II | 24-105L | 35L | 50 f/1.4
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 20, 2010 20:12 | #3 Very nice! That is one sharp lens!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
umphotography grabbing their Johnson  More info | Jun 20, 2010 21:38 | #4 AWGD8 wrote in post #10397142  Very nice! That is one sharp lens! I`m debating whether I go for my 5Dc+24-70L combo or 7D+16-35L combo. I just love the thin DOF of FF , but need a bit faster AF and FPS. Thanks a bunch!  i would go with a 17-55 if you go with the 7d. even then i would pick a 17-40 v/s a 16-35 on a 7d. Iso will not be an issue on the 7d so f/4 glass works good for about 90% of the time Mike
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jim_T Goldmember  3,312 posts Likes: 115 Joined Nov 2003 Location: Woodlands, MB, Canada More info | Jun 20, 2010 21:46 | #5 There are a pile of shots over in the Lens Sample Photo Archive.. https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?t=411156
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Ecosse Member 57 posts Joined Mar 2009 Location: Annapolis Valley, Nova Scotia More info | Jun 20, 2010 21:47 | #6 umphotography wrote in post #10397535 i would go with a 17-55 if you go with the 7d. even then i would pick a 17-40 v/s a 16-35 on a 7d. Iso will not be an issue on the 7d so f/4 glass works good for about 90% of the time It may not get him the DOF he's after though...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
power_play21 Member  202 posts Joined Jan 2010 Location: E Lansing, MI More info | Jun 20, 2010 21:55 | #7 alemerson wrote in post #10397127 So these aren't from a 7D. They are from my Xti, which has a similar 1.6x crop sensor. Both at 16mm at f/2.8 The similarities end in the size, sorry. Gear and Feedback
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 20, 2010 21:57 | #8 I sold my used 24-70L yesterday and I got a chance to try my buyer`s 7D using my sold 24-70L.  The reason I asked about 16-35mm L is the focal length is close to 24-70L when use on a crop body. I just can`t give up the thin DOF of FF , but looking at the 7D on 24-70L I think the DOF is thin enough for me except I don`t like the focal length on crop.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Collin85 Cream of the Crop  8,164 posts Joined Jan 2007 Location: Sydney/Beijing More info | Jun 20, 2010 22:03 | #9 AWGD8 wrote in post #10397142 Very nice! That is one sharp lens! I`m debating whether I go for my 5Dc+24-70L combo or 7D+16-35L combo. I just love the thin DOF of FF , but need a bit faster AF and FPS. Thanks a bunch! If you're staying with a 7D, get the 17-55. I've owned the 17-55, 17-40L, 16-35L and 16-35L II and the 17-55 has been by far the best (except for the build quality). But out of the choices you listed there, I'd rather a 5Dc and 24-70L. If you really want to stick with a 7D, get the 17-55! Col | Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 20, 2010 22:09 | #10 Collin85 wrote in post #10397681 If you're staying with a 7D, get the 17-55. I've owned the 17-55, 17-40L, 16-35L and 16-35L II and the 17-55 has been by far the best (except for the build quality). But out of the choices you listed there, I'd rather a 5Dc and 24-70L. If you really want to stick with a 7D, get the 17-55! 17-55 from what I heard is a dust magnet~ I already have a dust magnet body, one is enough.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Collin85 Cream of the Crop 8,164 posts Joined Jan 2007 Location: Sydney/Beijing More info | Jun 20, 2010 22:10 | #11 AWGD8 wrote in post #10397705 It seems like I might be sticking with the Classic and The Brick. Great choice. Col | Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
dru8p Member 239 posts Joined May 2010 More info | Jun 26, 2010 16:29 | #12 alemerson wrote in post #10397127 So these aren't from a 7D. They are from my Xti, which has a similar 1.6x crop sensor. Both at 16mm at f/2.8 any PP on these? Gear: 40D, 17-55mm, 50mm 1.8, 580ex ii
LOG IN TO REPLY |
braidkid Senior Member  371 posts Joined Oct 2008 More info | It's truly a shame the 17-55 has such a reputation as a "dust magnet". It's such a fine lens and such a non-issue that people miss out using the best zoom for a Canon crop. 5Dii, 16-35 f4L, 50f1.4, 580ex II, 430ex II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sam|McGuire Senior Member  865 posts Joined Nov 2008 Location: Burlington, VT 05401 More info | Jun 26, 2010 19:11 | #14 power_play21 wrote in post #10397631 The similarities end in the size, sorry. No? They are both a 1.6x crop and I believe he posted them to demonstrate the FOV the lens would have on a 7d which also utilizes a 1.6x crop sensor. Canon 5DII| 35L | 16-35LII |24-70L |70-200 F/2.8 IS LII | Alien Bees | CPS Member
LOG IN TO REPLY |
stax Senior Member  731 posts Likes: 1 Joined Aug 2009 Location: Oakland More info | Jun 26, 2010 19:15 | #15 braidkid wrote in post #10431601 It's truly a shame the 17-55 has such a reputation as a "dust magnet". It's such a fine lens and such a non-issue that people miss out using the best zoom for a Canon crop. I agree. I sold my 17-55 when I went full frame, but that lens rocks and the dust thing is way overblown. http://www.flickr.com/photos/staxnet/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Niagara Wedding Photographer 1333 guests, 132 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
