Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 26 Jun 2010 (Saturday) 02:31
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Real Estate Photography in Australia

 
this thread is locked
AussieCat
Senior Member
522 posts
Joined Feb 2007
     
Jun 26, 2010 02:31 |  #1

REAL ESTATE Photography in Australia.
I have been asked to photography residential houses for a real estate agen on a regular basis. Yet - I have never done real estate photography befor, only social events.
I am capable of doing real estate photography but want some opinions on the best lens to get for this.
You MUST go by the list below ONLY as I can only use canon products.
I know it may seem obvious on what type of lens to use.
I.E - fish eye or wide lens but im not sure specifically what is the best type of lens for photographing residential homes.
Please be specific with which ones below you think I could use.

EF Wide & Ultra-Wide

IMAGE: http://canon.com.au/images/sideBarSubExp.png
IMAGE LINK: http://canon.com.au …-You/Camera-Lenses/Lenses  (external link)
<LI class=rootMenu jQuery1277537273074="1​12">

EF Standard
(DUPLICATE IMAGE)
 (external link)
<LI class=rootMenu jQuery1277537273074="1​14">
EF Telephoto Zoom
(DUPLICATE IMAGE)
 (external link)
<LI class=rootMenu jQuery1277537273074="1​15">
EF Ultra-Wide Zoom
(DUPLICATE IMAGE)
 (external link)
[LIST]
  • EF 16-35mm f/2.8L II USM (external link)
  • EF 17-40mm f/4L USM (external link)
  • EF 20-35mm f/3.5-4.5 USM (external link)

    EF Standard Zoom
    (DUPLICATE IMAGE)
     (external link)
    <LI class=rootMenu jQuery1277537273074="1​17">


    NOTE - i do not want or need to use a til lens at all.

  • = Canon 50D Body
    = 17-55mm f2.8 IS USM lens
    = 580 Series II External Flash
    = Aussie Male = 33 years = Sydney Australia

      
      LOG IN TO REPLY
    Jardiniboy
    Senior Member
    508 posts
    Joined Jan 2008
    Location: Waipahu, Hawaii
         
    Jun 26, 2010 02:36 |  #2

    No tilt-shift lens?


    Gear List Flickr (external link)

      
      LOG IN TO REPLY
    rjx
    Goldmember
    Avatar
    2,670 posts
    Likes: 2
    Joined Oct 2007
    Location: Santa Clara, California
         
    Jun 26, 2010 02:53 |  #3

    Wow, you are going to need a lot of practice, reading, studying of images, and asking questions here, on the forums. I hope you are not starting this soon.

    http://www.amazon.com …0615260543/ref=​pd_sim_b_4 (external link)


    "It doesn't matter what camera you have if your photography has nothing worthwhile to say"
    “Photos are everywhere. You just have to know how to look.”

      
      LOG IN TO REPLY
    AussieCat
    THREAD ­ STARTER
    Senior Member
    522 posts
    Joined Feb 2007
         
    Jun 26, 2010 02:56 |  #4

    what are u talking about?


    i hav been member for yrs

    its juts a copy and paste from canon web site

    rjx wrote in post #10429194 (external link)
    Wow, you are going to need a lot of practice, reading, studying of images, and asking questions here, on the forums. I hope you are not starting this soon.

    http://www.amazon.com …0615260543/ref=​pd_sim_b_4 (external link)


    = Canon 50D Body
    = 17-55mm f2.8 IS USM lens
    = 580 Series II External Flash
    = Aussie Male = 33 years = Sydney Australia

      
      LOG IN TO REPLY
    AussieCat
    THREAD ­ STARTER
    Senior Member
    522 posts
    Joined Feb 2007
         
    Jun 26, 2010 02:57 |  #5

    why do i need tilt shift?

    Jardiniboy wrote in post #10429156 (external link)
    No tilt-shift lens?


    = Canon 50D Body
    = 17-55mm f2.8 IS USM lens
    = 580 Series II External Flash
    = Aussie Male = 33 years = Sydney Australia

      
      LOG IN TO REPLY
    Jardiniboy
    Senior Member
    508 posts
    Joined Jan 2008
    Location: Waipahu, Hawaii
         
    Jun 26, 2010 03:03 |  #6

    AussieCat wrote in post #10429202 (external link)
    what are u talking about?


    i hav been member for yrs

    its juts a copy and paste from canon web site

    He's not talking about how you've been on here, he's talking about taking real estate photos.

    Since you've not done any real estate photography before, he sent you a link to a book that you could buy or read up on real estate photography.

    Lens wise, even though you haven't posted it as an option, I would say a tilt-shift lens. The canon 17mm or the 24mm MKII Tilt shift lens is great for real estate.


    Gear List Flickr (external link)

      
      LOG IN TO REPLY
    troutfisher
    Goldmember
    Avatar
    1,665 posts
    Gallery: 23 photos
    Likes: 33
    Joined Apr 2007
    Location: West Yorkshire UK
         
    Jun 26, 2010 03:09 |  #7

    I do the same job in the UK and use a sigma 10-20 on a 40D, you say you are restricted to canon lenses so I would go for the 10-20mm, but as has been pointed out in other posts ideally a tilt and shift if your budget will run to it.
    I think I would start out with a 10-20 and if the job takes off and you make money at it then buy a T&S

    Cheers


    Chris
    " Age and treachery will always defeat youth and enthusiasm"

      
      LOG IN TO REPLY
    AussieCat
    THREAD ­ STARTER
    Senior Member
    522 posts
    Joined Feb 2007
         
    Jun 26, 2010 03:10 |  #8

    oh i see.

    well, i have donr sample images of 5 houses and shown the real estate

    they were happy with them but just said i need to get a lense that will allow me to capture more of the room.

    i dont like "fish-eye"

    can i get ultra wide as an alternatve to fish eye?

    also - i dont need or want a motion shift lense (for motion picture where you click on it to move around....)

    Jardiniboy wrote in post #10429215 (external link)
    He's not talking about how you've been on here, he's talking about taking real estate photos.

    Since you've not done any real estate photography before, he sent you a link to a book that you could buy or read up on real estate photography.

    Lens wise, even though you haven't posted it as an option, I would say a tilt-shift lens. The canon 17mm or the 24mm MKII Tilt shift lens is great for real estate.


    = Canon 50D Body
    = 17-55mm f2.8 IS USM lens
    = 580 Series II External Flash
    = Aussie Male = 33 years = Sydney Australia

      
      LOG IN TO REPLY
    rjx
    Goldmember
    Avatar
    2,670 posts
    Likes: 2
    Joined Oct 2007
    Location: Santa Clara, California
         
    Jun 26, 2010 03:15 |  #9

    AussieCat wrote in post #10429227 (external link)
    i have donr sample images of 5 houses and shown the real estate

    they were happy with them but just said i need to get a lense that will allow me to capture more of the room.

    Oh? In your opening post you said "I have never done real estate photography befor."


    "It doesn't matter what camera you have if your photography has nothing worthwhile to say"
    “Photos are everywhere. You just have to know how to look.”

      
      LOG IN TO REPLY
    klr.b
    Goldmember
    2,509 posts
    Joined Jun 2009
    Location: SoCal
         
    Jun 26, 2010 03:24 |  #10

    most architecture is shot with a tilt-shift. the tilt-shift lens prevents the parallel lines from converging. it's fixable in PS, though, which is great since most of us can't afford one.

    i think with your 50D, you'll want ultra wide for interior shots. you'll want it to look as big and open as possible. 10-22 would work well. personally, i can't stand fisheye shots. i'm okay with them after they've been corrected for distortion, but then isn't that the whole point?


    gordon
    Gear and Feedback

      
      LOG IN TO REPLY
    marklift
    Member
    Avatar
    48 posts
    Joined Oct 2007
    Location: Tomball, Tx
         
    Jun 26, 2010 03:27 |  #11

    I do photos and virtual tours with a 10-22 Canon lens and it does a great job! It has minor distortion but not as extreme as a fish eye. If it bothers you, or you are ready to go to the next level, there are some programs that will further correct for this lens and other lens' you have. Here is a youtube video I recently did and the house just closed last week.

    http://www.youtube.com​/watch?v=-o1Sz3_ZfO8 (external link)


    Canon 7D, 40D, S90 - EF 10-22, 50mm f/1.4, 17-55mm,
    70-200 F/4 IS, 100-400mm, 100mm F/2.8L IS,

      
      LOG IN TO REPLY
    AussieCat
    THREAD ­ STARTER
    Senior Member
    522 posts
    Joined Feb 2007
         
    Jun 26, 2010 03:30 |  #12

    wow

    i kno-w what u mean about fish

    its look so fake!

    so, 10-20.

    what is the specific model description as per my first post?

    what catergory is it under...

    klr.b wrote in post #10429253 (external link)
    most architecture is shot with a tilt-shift. the tilt-shift lens prevents the parallel lines from converging. it's fixable in PS, though, which is great since most of us can't afford one.

    i think with your 50D, you'll want ultra wide for interior shots. you'll want it to look as big and open as possible. 10-22 would work well. personally, i can't stand fisheye shots. i'm okay with them after they've been corrected for distortion, but then isn't that the whole point?


    = Canon 50D Body
    = 17-55mm f2.8 IS USM lens
    = 580 Series II External Flash
    = Aussie Male = 33 years = Sydney Australia

      
      LOG IN TO REPLY
    AussieCat
    THREAD ­ STARTER
    Senior Member
    522 posts
    Joined Feb 2007
         
    Jun 26, 2010 03:31 |  #13

    hey do u mean 10-22

    troutfisher wrote in post #10429225 (external link)
    I do the same job in the UK and use a sigma 10-20 on a 40D, you say you are restricted to canon lenses so I would go for the 10-20mm, but as has been pointed out in other posts ideally a tilt and shift if your budget will run to it.
    I think I would start out with a 10-20 and if the job takes off and you make money at it then buy a T&S

    Cheers


    = Canon 50D Body
    = 17-55mm f2.8 IS USM lens
    = 580 Series II External Flash
    = Aussie Male = 33 years = Sydney Australia

      
      LOG IN TO REPLY
    klr.b
    Goldmember
    2,509 posts
    Joined Jun 2009
    Location: SoCal
         
    Jun 26, 2010 03:35 |  #14

    Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM

    i don't see it on your list. if you already had a fish eye, you could use it and correct for the distortion, but it's a lot of unnecessary work than if you just bought a regular ultra wide.


    gordon
    Gear and Feedback

      
      LOG IN TO REPLY
    AussieCat
    THREAD ­ STARTER
    Senior Member
    522 posts
    Joined Feb 2007
         
    Jun 26, 2010 03:39 |  #15

    ...

    might i be better of going for:

    EF Wide & Ultra-Wide - EF 14mm f/2.8L II USM

    INSTEAD of:

    EF Ultra-Wide Zoom - EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM

    even thoough it is 14mm, not as wide as the 10mm

    its app is 2.8 so it lets more light in and it has "II" USM

    what is the main difference with how the "II USM" opposed to the "USM"?

    (is it the constant appature light level thing?)


    = Canon 50D Body
    = 17-55mm f2.8 IS USM lens
    = 580 Series II External Flash
    = Aussie Male = 33 years = Sydney Australia

      
      LOG IN TO REPLY
    sponsored links (only for non-logged)

    8,852 views & 0 likes for this thread, 22 members have posted to it.
    Real Estate Photography in Australia
    FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
    AAA
    x 1600
    y 1600

    Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

    Not a member yet?
    Register to forums
    Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


    COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
    Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


    POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
    version 2.58 /
    code and design
    by Pekka Saarinen ©
    for photography-on-the.net

    Latest registered member is Frankie Frankenberry
    1111 guests, 116 members online
    Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

    Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.