Not looking for anything specific here in terms of criticism, just fire away.
 | HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/png' | Redirected to error image by ZENFOLIO PROTECTED |
Walkingmanblues Member  200 posts Likes: 19 Joined Jun 2008 More info | Jun 26, 2010 17:54 | #1 Not looking for anything specific here in terms of criticism, just fire away.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
corkneyfonz Goldmember  2,477 posts Likes: 5 Joined Oct 2009 Location: United Kingdom More info | Jun 26, 2010 19:34 | #2 One light that I hate from my film days is tungsten with its horrible yellow casts. To me this is not the most suitable illumination to be drawing extra attention to, as I'm just having flashbacks.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Scottdog129 Senior Member  637 posts Joined Sep 2009 Location: Reno, Nevada USA More info | Jun 26, 2010 20:25 | #3 I actually kinda like it. The blurred foreground kinda adds to the appeal for me. Nice shot. Scott Thompson - www.sthompsonphoto.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 27, 2010 00:53 | #4 corkneyfonz wrote in post #10432164  One light that I hate from my film days is tungsten with its horrible yellow casts. To me this is not the most suitable illumination to be drawing extra attention to, as I'm just having flashbacks. Yea, I'm just not sure what to make of it. I'm not overly fond of this selective color thing--thus the title of the post--but it seemed a good way to rescue an otherwise bland photo that, yes, was a white balance nightmare. Thanks...and thanks to you, too, Scottdog for taking a look.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DxHatchback Goldmember  1,378 posts Joined Apr 2005 Location: State College, PA More info | Jun 27, 2010 14:49 | #5 I sort of dig the shot, but am not really a fan of the blurred foreground. Andrew M. Revels, Jr. | 1D Mark II N | 28-75 | 70-200
LOG IN TO REPLY |
wizcreations Senior Member  948 posts Joined Apr 2010 Location: Brevard County, FL, United States More info | Jun 27, 2010 15:08 | #6 DxHatchback wrote in post #10435537 I sort of dig the shot, but am not really a fan of the blurred foreground. Agreed. I feel it would be better with the foreground also in focus. My Gear / Feedback
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 28, 2010 06:46 | #7 Blurred foreground...well, the camera was sitting on the ground as I didn't have a tripod. We do what we can
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Flo Gimmie Some Lovin  44,987 posts Likes: 16 Joined Jul 2007 Location: Nanaimo,B.C. More info | Michael, it looks cool.how about cropping that foreground? you're a great friend, but if Zombies chase us, I am tripping you.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 28, 2010 11:41 | #9 Hey Gail. How far up do you think I should take it?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Flo Gimmie Some Lovin 44,987 posts Likes: 16 Joined Jul 2007 Location: Nanaimo,B.C. More info | How about right up the the top of the shadow/ darker area? you're a great friend, but if Zombies chase us, I am tripping you.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 28, 2010 14:02 | #11 Have to give it a try, but I'm thinking maybe I'm flogging a dead horse with this one
LOG IN TO REPLY |
dozyaustin Member  49 posts Joined Apr 2010 Location: Austin TX More info | Jun 28, 2010 14:59 | #12 Instead of 100% B/W, I would just desaturate it, but not completely. I (as in personal preference) would like that. The overall shot is very nice, however! Igor Holas, Austin, TX
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 28, 2010 16:37 | #13 What about this one? Very quick PP, and I wouldn't want to look at it at 100% crop, but it does solve the blurred foreground problem of the OP. Serviceable?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
4Deuce Member 83 posts Joined Jun 2010 More info | Jul 02, 2010 09:35 | #14 I am actually liking this one. Nice job! Current Equipment: Canon 40D | Canon 28mm 1.8 | Canon 60mm 2.8 Macro | Canon 70-200mm F/4L IS |
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is ANebinger 932 guests, 148 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
