Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Astronomy & Celestial 
Thread started 27 Jun 2010 (Sunday) 09:58
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

what is to the left of the sun

 
jtango992
Hatchling
1 post
Joined Jun 2010
     
Jun 27, 2010 09:58 |  #1

mercury? Photo taken at 1pm central mountain time. Yesterday.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nighthound
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
11,675 posts
Gallery: 224 photos
Best ofs: 24
Likes: 4526
Joined Aug 2007
     
Jun 27, 2010 15:49 |  #2

The only planet in that position at that time is Mercury. Care to share how you processed this? Interesting.


Steve
Canon Gear: 1D Mark IV | 1D Mark II | 5D | 20D | 500L IS (f/4) | 100-400L
SteveEllwoodPhotograph​y.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sandpiper
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,171 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 53
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Merseyside, England
     
Jun 27, 2010 16:12 as a reply to  @ Nighthound's post |  #3

I'm not an expert on astronomical photography etc., so I may be way off beam here.

However, I would have thought that at the small apertures you were probably using to shoot the sun, then a planet would not show up?

Besides, that looks more like an internal lens reflection to me.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nighthound
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
11,675 posts
Gallery: 224 photos
Best ofs: 24
Likes: 4526
Joined Aug 2007
     
Jun 27, 2010 18:44 |  #4

I'm inclined to agree on the reflection. The size of the sphere in question is appears large for Mercury as well. It's more consistent with the scale of Jupiter.

Venus being so bright can be seen in daylight if you know where to look for it with enough magnification using care not to look toward the sun.

The shot above appears to be stretched in curves or levels to darken the sky and create contrast which is partially why I asked about processing specifics.


Steve
Canon Gear: 1D Mark IV | 1D Mark II | 5D | 20D | 500L IS (f/4) | 100-400L
SteveEllwoodPhotograph​y.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Adrena1in
Goldmember
1,703 posts
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Winchester, Hampshire, UK.
     
Jun 28, 2010 08:27 |  #5

Lens flare almost certainly I would say.


Canon EOS 450D, Sigma 18-200mm, Canon 50mm f/2.5 Macro, 2x TC, Revelation 12" f/5 Dobsonian, Mintron PD2285-EX webcam.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Naturalist
Adrift on a lonely vast sea
5,769 posts
Likes: 1251
Joined May 2007
     
Jun 28, 2010 08:35 |  #6

Lens flare or reflection.



5D Mk IV & 7D Mk II
EF 16-35 f/4L EF 50 f/1.8 (Original) EF 24-105 f/4L EF 100 f/2.8L Macro EF 100-400 f/4.5-5.6L[/FONT]

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nighthound
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
11,675 posts
Gallery: 224 photos
Best ofs: 24
Likes: 4526
Joined Aug 2007
     
Jun 28, 2010 11:42 |  #7

Also, assuming no dodging was done, any planet in this position would not be frontal lit like the object of question.


Steve
Canon Gear: 1D Mark IV | 1D Mark II | 5D | 20D | 500L IS (f/4) | 100-400L
SteveEllwoodPhotograph​y.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pitrow
Member
209 posts
Joined Sep 2009
Location: Newberg, OR
     
Jun 29, 2010 11:39 |  #8

Nighthound wrote in post #10440699 (external link)
Also, assuming no dodging was done, any planet in this position would not be frontal lit like the object of question.

Not necessarily. If the "planet" was on the other side of the sun it would be front lit. However this looks to me like nothing more than reflection.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
vaswoman
Mostly Lurking
12 posts
Joined Jul 2007
     
Jun 29, 2010 11:41 |  #9

ufo




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nighthound
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
11,675 posts
Gallery: 224 photos
Best ofs: 24
Likes: 4526
Joined Aug 2007
     
Jun 29, 2010 11:57 |  #10

pitrow wrote in post #10447630 (external link)
Not necessarily. If the "planet" was on the other side of the sun it would be front lit. However this looks to me like nothing more than reflection.

Obviously a poor choice of words on my part, thanks for the correction. If it were a planet at that time moving in front of or behind the Sun it would be Mercury, and definitely not at this scale. Note the scale and this is minus the glare.
http://sohowww.nascom.​nasa.gov …y_transit_2006_​pearls.gif (external link)

Internal optics reflection is my conclusion.


Steve
Canon Gear: 1D Mark IV | 1D Mark II | 5D | 20D | 500L IS (f/4) | 100-400L
SteveEllwoodPhotograph​y.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tk421ek
Junior Member
Avatar
24 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jun 2010
     
Jul 07, 2010 00:22 |  #11

Definitely flare. Has similar color scheme, too transparent, and far to big.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,044 views & 0 likes for this thread, 8 members have posted to it.
what is to the left of the sun
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Astronomy & Celestial 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Thunderstream
1218 guests, 123 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.