mercury? Photo taken at 1pm central mountain time. Yesterday.
Jun 27, 2010 15:49 | #2 The only planet in that position at that time is Mercury. Care to share how you processed this? Interesting. Steve
LOG IN TO REPLY |
sandpiper Cream of the Crop More info | I'm not an expert on astronomical photography etc., so I may be way off beam here.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 27, 2010 18:44 | #4 I'm inclined to agree on the reflection. The size of the sphere in question is appears large for Mercury as well. It's more consistent with the scale of Jupiter. Steve
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Adrena1in Goldmember 1,703 posts Joined Aug 2007 Location: Winchester, Hampshire, UK. More info | Jun 28, 2010 08:27 | #5 Lens flare almost certainly I would say. Canon EOS 450D, Sigma 18-200mm, Canon 50mm f/2.5 Macro, 2x TC, Revelation 12" f/5 Dobsonian, Mintron PD2285-EX webcam.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Naturalist Adrift on a lonely vast sea 5,769 posts Likes: 1251 Joined May 2007 More info | Jun 28, 2010 08:35 | #6 Lens flare or reflection.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 28, 2010 11:42 | #7 Also, assuming no dodging was done, any planet in this position would not be frontal lit like the object of question. Steve
LOG IN TO REPLY |
pitrow Member 209 posts Joined Sep 2009 Location: Newberg, OR More info | Jun 29, 2010 11:39 | #8 Nighthound wrote in post #10440699 Also, assuming no dodging was done, any planet in this position would not be frontal lit like the object of question. Not necessarily. If the "planet" was on the other side of the sun it would be front lit. However this looks to me like nothing more than reflection.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
vaswoman Mostly Lurking 12 posts Joined Jul 2007 More info | Jun 29, 2010 11:41 | #9 ufo
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 29, 2010 11:57 | #10 pitrow wrote in post #10447630 Not necessarily. If the "planet" was on the other side of the sun it would be front lit. However this looks to me like nothing more than reflection. Obviously a poor choice of words on my part, thanks for the correction. If it were a planet at that time moving in front of or behind the Sun it would be Mercury, and definitely not at this scale. Note the scale and this is minus the glare. Steve
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tk421ek Junior Member 24 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jun 2010 More info | Jul 07, 2010 00:22 | #11 Definitely flare. Has similar color scheme, too transparent, and far to big.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Thunderstream 1218 guests, 123 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||