I have a Canon T1i camera. I am going to be going to the Grand Canyon. My question is what lense would you use to take pics of the canyon. I am new so please help. Thanks for all your help.
asahi1234 Hatchling 4 posts Joined Jun 2010 Location: Texas More info | Jun 27, 2010 19:08 | #1 I have a Canon T1i camera. I am going to be going to the Grand Canyon. My question is what lense would you use to take pics of the canyon. I am new so please help. Thanks for all your help.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
smilebug Senior Member 954 posts Likes: 1 Joined Feb 2010 Location: SoCal More info | Jun 27, 2010 19:09 | #2 What's your budget? I suggest a wide angle lens. If you are on a tight-ish budget, then I'd go with the Canon 10-22. If not, go get yourself the Canon 17-40L. My camera ♥'s my dogs more than me...*sigh*
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Five hundred would be my budget.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
smilebug Senior Member 954 posts Likes: 1 Joined Feb 2010 Location: SoCal More info | Jun 27, 2010 19:14 | #4 THen maybe the Canon 10-22, or the Tokina 12-24. My vote, for the Tokina. My camera ♥'s my dogs more than me...*sigh*
LOG IN TO REPLY |
What lens (or lenses) do you already have? Are you looking to take pictures of ultra wide landscapes, or other things, or both? R6 | R7 | 15-85is | Rokinon 14 2.8 | RF 16 2.8 | 16-35 F4is L | RF 24-105 F4is L | RF 70-200 F4is L | 100-400 II L | Σ150-600 C | 1.4X III | 2X III | 430ex |
LOG IN TO REPLY |
thatkatmat Cream of the Crop 9,342 posts Gallery: 41 photos Likes: 205 Joined Jul 2007 Location: Seattle, don't move here, it's wet and cold More info | Jun 27, 2010 19:17 | #6 The Sigma 10-20 is another solid choice. I don't think the 17-40 will be wide enough on a crop sensor. My Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
smilebug Senior Member 954 posts Likes: 1 Joined Feb 2010 Location: SoCal More info | Jun 27, 2010 19:18 | #7 thatkatmat wrote in post #10436719 The Sigma 10-20 is another solid choice. I don't think the 17-40 will be wide enough on a crop sensor. Oops, just saw you have a T1i! My camera ♥'s my dogs more than me...*sigh*
LOG IN TO REPLY |
greene.matt Member 99 posts Joined Mar 2010 More info | Jun 27, 2010 19:22 | #8 Logg_1 wrote in post #10436665 What's your budget? I suggest a wide angle lens. If you are on a tight-ish budget, then I'd go with the Canon 10-22. If not, go get yourself the Canon 17-40L. I think those two lens are actually the same exact price for the most part anyways. Matthew Greene
LOG IN TO REPLY |
smilebug Senior Member 954 posts Likes: 1 Joined Feb 2010 Location: SoCal More info | Jun 27, 2010 19:23 | #9 greene.matt wrote in post #10436751 I think those two lens are actually the same exact price for the most part anyways. Quite possibly, unless he/she plans on buying it new. My camera ♥'s my dogs more than me...*sigh*
LOG IN TO REPLY |
The lense that came with the camera 18mm-50mm. I am open to any brand as long as it is good quality lense
LOG IN TO REPLY |
dennisatmph Senior Member 511 posts Joined Nov 2003 More info | Jun 27, 2010 19:58 | #11 I just came back from grand canyon, you will need the wide angle lens to capture the breath of the landscape. canon 5 d mark 2, canon 50 prime 1.2, canon 17-40 L , 580EXII , 430 EXII
LOG IN TO REPLY |
SkipD Cream of the Crop 20,476 posts Likes: 165 Joined Dec 2002 Location: Southeastern WI, USA More info | Jun 27, 2010 20:43 | #12 In my opinion, an ultra-wide and the Grand Canyon don't mix well. Most ultra-wide shots I've seen of places like that have virtually nothing of interest in the foreground and the rest is so small (appearing to be more distant than it is) that the whole image is uninteresting. Skip Douglas
LOG IN TO REPLY |
wtlwdwgn Senior Member 714 posts Likes: 7 Joined Jan 2010 Location: Billings, MT More info | Jun 28, 2010 10:19 | #13 SkipD wrote in post #10437116 In my opinion, an ultra-wide and the Grand Canyon don't mix well. Most ultra-wide shots I've seen of places like that have virtually nothing of interest in the foreground and the rest is so small (appearing to be more distant than it is) that the whole image is uninteresting. I would add something like a 70-200 to the 18-55 and use them both for scenery such as that at the Grand Canyon. In addition to the landscape, you'll find that there's a lot of interesting small wildlife in the foreground that you'd want the 200mm for. +1. Well said. Steve
LOG IN TO REPLY |
thatkatmat Cream of the Crop 9,342 posts Gallery: 41 photos Likes: 205 Joined Jul 2007 Location: Seattle, don't move here, it's wet and cold More info | Jun 28, 2010 10:30 | #14 Although I agree it's nice to get the scenery and the wildlife, I couldn't imagine going to the Grand Canyon without an ultrawide as well to capture the grandeur of it all. I will add that I've seen some amazing shots of the Big Bend and other locations with an ultrawide....But to each there own and I understand your thought process to some extent. My Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2848 guests, 154 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||