A very valid point. I edit heavily. I don't judge on physical attractiveness much, unless the client is adamant about it. However, I do judge on sobriety. Does the subject really want a photo of themselves banged up at 8 in the morning put up on the internet? Probably not, even if it seems like a good idea at the time. "Girls Gone Wild" type of photos, I'll take if they ask, but I never publish. I have an archive of "NSFW" images.
If anything my rep is "He only takes photos of his friends". OK, you got me there. However, I do know a lot of people. 8)
But yes, you definitely want to be cognizant of what the public thinks of you as a shooter. I'm thought of as the above, which isn't a bad thing. A friend of mine is known as the "nice guy", and he gets a lot of outside work because of it. Another guy we both know is known as a "cocky a--hole" because he doesn't respect people's space and privacy. He thinks because there's a little sign out front of the club that says "By entering you consent to being filmed or photographed", it means he can do what he wants. Someone is going to punch him one of these days.
It might seem glamourous and so forth to be the next "hipster party photographer" (won't mention any names, but you guys should know who I mean) but that type of fame is short-lived. Call me a snob but I don't consider invasion of privacy hip. Yes, I'm fully aware the patrons are in a nightclub and a nightclub is a public place, but at the end of the day it is all about respecting the crowd you're tasked to document.