I know the power variable runs in 1/10 steps over 6.6 f-stop range. If the wattage is at 2.0 what would that be aperture wise?
Tlee05 "Suck these toes" 1,134 posts Joined Oct 2005 Location: Surrey More info | Jul 01, 2010 11:53 | #1 I know the power variable runs in 1/10 steps over 6.6 f-stop range. If the wattage is at 2.0 what would that be aperture wise? "The goal is not to change your subjects, but for the subject to change the photographer."
LOG IN TO REPLY |
symbolphoto Cream of the Crop 6,628 posts Likes: 18 Joined Nov 2005 Location: Boston, MA More info | Jul 01, 2010 11:56 | #2 It's difficult to say really, would depend on several factors such as light distance to subject etc. Do you have a specific scenario in mind?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
For instance if I had no light meter and wanted to get it spot on nearly first time without using the histogram. "The goal is not to change your subjects, but for the subject to change the photographer."
LOG IN TO REPLY |
picturecrazy soft-hearted weenie-boy 8,565 posts Likes: 780 Joined Jan 2006 Location: Alberta, CANADA More info | Jul 01, 2010 16:27 | #4 Nobody would really know, nor could anyone tell you. It depends on your camera, your ISO, the umbrella brand and reflectivity, and what other reflective surfaces are close to your model. Only you could find out for sure. -Lloyd
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 01, 2010 18:33 | #5 Good point, I was seeing what roughly people estimated it at. I was seeing what everyones views where. "The goal is not to change your subjects, but for the subject to change the photographer."
LOG IN TO REPLY |
poopinmymouth Member 180 posts Joined Jan 2008 Location: Cologne, Germany More info | Jul 02, 2010 05:41 | #6 The real point of it is to give you a way to match elinchrom lights. If your BXRI, quadra, and ranger all have f/4 on the readout, they are all putting out the exact same amount of light, even if they are radically different maximum power units (800, 400, 100, etc). Lighting Blog: http://mr-chompers.blogspot.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Poopinmymouth, What a name lol. "The goal is not to change your subjects, but for the subject to change the photographer."
LOG IN TO REPLY |
poopinmymouth Member 180 posts Joined Jan 2008 Location: Cologne, Germany More info | Jul 02, 2010 06:55 | #8 No, the point is you ignore the wattage, and pay attention to the F stop number. The 100 watt unit won't go above a certain number, but as long as you can get all of them to read the same number, it will be identical output. Lighting Blog: http://mr-chompers.blogspot.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
poopinmymouth Member 180 posts Joined Jan 2008 Location: Cologne, Germany More info | Jul 02, 2010 06:55 | #9 but even then, this is all made useless by other settings. Even if you have them both reading f/4, if they are at different distances, or have different lighting modifiers, it changes things up as well. Lighting Blog: http://mr-chompers.blogspot.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 02, 2010 07:15 | #10 Thanks thats cleared up alot so you can't really tell till you pull out the light meter yourself and figure it out in each situation I suppose. My mind is bubbling. "The goal is not to change your subjects, but for the subject to change the photographer."
LOG IN TO REPLY |
poopinmymouth Member 180 posts Joined Jan 2008 Location: Cologne, Germany More info | Jul 02, 2010 08:43 | #11 Yep, that's correct Lighting Blog: http://mr-chompers.blogspot.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is IoDaLi Photography 1829 guests, 120 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||