the top part of the stack is indifferentiated from the background. also its still blue
i appreciate your help tho.
i tried really hard but i dont think theres a solution with just the raw processors. can anyone give me an idea of a good solution?
Jul 01, 2010 14:10 | #16 the top part of the stack is indifferentiated from the background. also its still blue
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 01, 2010 14:12 | #17 soz if i sound ungrateful
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 01, 2010 14:18 | #18 Well like I said it isn't perfect and it was quick. I think the RAW processor isn't the way to go since you can't make selections in it. Unless Lightroom can. I don't have that so I don't know. Basicly all I did was us COLOR RANGE in Photoshop and kept clicking on the sacks to choose them. Then if stuff in the backgraound got selected I used the MARQUE tool to deselect them. Click OK. Then used the CURVES tool and the white balance eyedropper and clicked on the lightest part of the sacks. Done. So, really, just select the sacks and use any tool you feel comfortable with to get rid of the blue. "No matter where you go, there you are" Buckaroo Banzai
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 01, 2010 14:18 | #19 ayoyoayoyo wrote in post #10461390 soz if i sound ungrateful No sweat. It's all good. "No matter where you go, there you are" Buckaroo Banzai
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 01, 2010 14:19 | #20 k ill try that
LOG IN TO REPLY |
garys1 Goldmember 1,044 posts Likes: 16 Joined Dec 2009 More info | Jul 01, 2010 14:39 | #21 Is this how it's supposed to look?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 01, 2010 15:17 | #22 yeah.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 01, 2010 15:21 | #23 for the life of me i can never get it all white like that. its either pale blue or pale green.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
garys1 Goldmember 1,044 posts Likes: 16 Joined Dec 2009 More info | Jul 01, 2010 18:11 | #24 ayoyoayoyo wrote in post #10461839 for the life of me i can never get it all white like that. its either pale blue or pale green. Took about 5 minutes in CS5. All I did was go to adjustments tab and selected match color. From there I selected neutralize. That took out most of the blue. I then went into adjustments again and selected hue and saturation. In the drop down box where it says master, I selected blue and lowered the saturation until most of the blue was gone. I then selected from the drop down box, cyan and lowered the saturation until it came out to what you now see. That's it!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
PixelPusher Goldmember 1,929 posts Gallery: 85 photos Best ofs: 1 Likes: 1205 Joined Feb 2009 Location: Surf City, USA - Left Coast More info | Jul 01, 2010 18:31 | #25 Reminds me of coming from a product photo shoot stint at work using the tungsten lighting setting on camera, and went to a quick rush for some soccer shots with the camera still set to tungsten, and got a very heavy blue cast. Won't do that again. Robert
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 02, 2010 00:47 | #26 im using cs4 and i dont see a match color option.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
garys1 Goldmember 1,044 posts Likes: 16 Joined Dec 2009 More info | Jul 02, 2010 00:56 | #27 ayoyoayoyo wrote in post #10464535 im using cs4 and i dont see a match color option. It's there. Click on image/adjustments. It's toward the bottom of the list.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 02, 2010 01:40 | #28 wow....thats pretty neat.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
kirkt Cream of the Crop More info | Jul 02, 2010 08:53 | #29 You have two different light source color temperatures in the same scene. if you set the WB for one, it will drive the other even further away from "accurate." THe background is likely daylight (~5500K) while the sacks are in shade (maybe 7000-10,000K). If you white balance for the daylight, the sacks look blue. If you white balance for the sacks the background turns amber. If you try to click WB on the sacks, you may remove the blue cast, but you may introduce another cast if the sacks are not actually neutral in real life. You probably want to process the image twice in your RAW converter - once with a daylight WB and once with something like shade. Then take the two images and blend them with a layer mask in PS. Kirk
LOG IN TO REPLY |
garys1 Goldmember 1,044 posts Likes: 16 Joined Dec 2009 More info | Jul 02, 2010 10:06 | #30 ayoyoayoyo wrote in post #10464725 wow....thats pretty neat. tho whats the point of neutralising first since you are removing all the blues with the zero saturation thing. Try and only desaturating the blue and cyan. You'll see the difference.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2753 guests, 147 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||