Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
Thread started 01 Jul 2010 (Thursday) 23:01
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

alien bee and wireless trigger question

 
jxs1984
Senior Member
342 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Nov 2006
     
Jul 01, 2010 23:01 |  #1

I know my camera's max sync speed is 1/250 and I can't go faster unless I enable HSS on the 580exII. However I'm looking to get an AlienBee B1600 flash unit and I was wondering which wireless trigger will allow me to shoot photos at a shutter speed of 1/500 or higher... if thats possible?



Nikon D810 · Tokina 16-28mm f/2.8 · Sigma 35mm f/1.4 art · Nikon 85mm f/1.8g
flickr (external link), facebook (external link)
, gear & feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
30,917 posts
Gallery: 561 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 14912
Joined Dec 2006
     
Jul 01, 2010 23:05 |  #2

you cant shoot with the alien bees in the traditional sense above your cameras max sync speed. With the pocket wizard mini system users have been able to fool the timing and get the long tail burn of the ab to achieve faster speeds called hypersync. This isnt the full power of the light however. Users have reported doing something similar with the radio popper px system




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jxs1984
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
342 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Nov 2006
     
Jul 01, 2010 23:10 |  #3

Is it safe? Will it reduce the life of the AB in the long run?



Nikon D810 · Tokina 16-28mm f/2.8 · Sigma 35mm f/1.4 art · Nikon 85mm f/1.8g
flickr (external link), facebook (external link)
, gear & feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
30,917 posts
Gallery: 561 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 14912
Joined Dec 2006
     
Jul 01, 2010 23:14 |  #4

jxs1984 wrote in post #10464137 (external link)
Is it safe? Will it reduce the life of the AB in the long run?

no, the flash doesnt know its being fooled. It fires regularly. But you cant meter it with a flashmeter as it doesnt record the full flash. Why do you need faster sync speeds with the bee?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jxs1984
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
342 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Nov 2006
     
Jul 01, 2010 23:20 |  #5

I would like to shoot photos at f2.8 or wider... perhaps I should go with the ND route?



Nikon D810 · Tokina 16-28mm f/2.8 · Sigma 35mm f/1.4 art · Nikon 85mm f/1.8g
flickr (external link), facebook (external link)
, gear & feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
vinnie6756
Goldmember
Avatar
1,075 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Oct 2009
Location: 45° 6' 0" N / 87° 37' 50" W a.k.a - Marinette, WI
     
Jul 01, 2010 23:25 |  #6

jxs1984 wrote in post #10464190 (external link)
I would like to shoot photos at f2.8 or wider... perhaps I should go with the ND route?

Reduce the power of the AB. If you want to shoot wide open, go to 1/8 or 1/16 power. You have 6 stops of lighting power so I see no reason why this won't work unless I missing something.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jxs1984
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
342 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Nov 2006
     
Jul 01, 2010 23:26 |  #7

vinnie6756 wrote in post #10464215 (external link)
Reduce the power of the AB. If you want to shoot wide open, go to 1/8 or 1/16 power. You have 6 stops of lighting power so I see no reason why this won't work unless I missing something.

What if outside is very sunny?



Nikon D810 · Tokina 16-28mm f/2.8 · Sigma 35mm f/1.4 art · Nikon 85mm f/1.8g
flickr (external link), facebook (external link)
, gear & feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
30,917 posts
Gallery: 561 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 14912
Joined Dec 2006
     
Jul 01, 2010 23:27 |  #8

jxs1984 wrote in post #10464190 (external link)
I would like to shoot photos at f2.8 or wider... perhaps I should go with the ND route?

Its a lot cheaper to do the ND route, and you get a more reliable output. But if you are using the ab during the hard light of day, you dont necessarily need 2.8 to control the background. You can do it by illuminating what you want to show and let the rest fall into the darker area.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jxs1984
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
342 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Nov 2006
     
Jul 01, 2010 23:34 |  #9

gonzogolf wrote in post #10464232 (external link)
Its a lot cheaper to do the ND route, and you get a more reliable output. But if you are using the ab during the hard light of day, you dont necessarily need 2.8 to control the background. You can do it by illuminating what you want to show and let the rest fall into the darker area.

two 580ex II at full power, f/22, 1/250 and iso 100

IMAGE: http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4007/4492304664_13a1e0c755_b.jpg

if i widen the f-stop, background gets overexposed. how can I prevent that?


Nikon D810 · Tokina 16-28mm f/2.8 · Sigma 35mm f/1.4 art · Nikon 85mm f/1.8g
flickr (external link), facebook (external link)
, gear & feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
30,917 posts
Gallery: 561 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 14912
Joined Dec 2006
     
Jul 02, 2010 06:54 |  #10

Provided you have enough flash power to compensate for the loss to the ND filter then you can go that route. My point (as evidenced by the nice shot above) is that you dont need to buy into the f/2.8 background blur hype. If you underexpose the background by a couple of stops as you have done above you dont need to have super shallow DOF.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
egordon99
Cream of the Crop
10,247 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Philly 'burbs
     
Jul 02, 2010 08:42 |  #11

gonzogolf wrote in post #10465403 (external link)
Provided you have enough flash power to compensate for the loss to the ND filter then you can go that route. My point (as evidenced by the nice shot above) is that you dont need to buy into the f/2.8 background blur hype. If you underexpose the background by a couple of stops as you have done above you dont need to have super shallow DOF.

Agreed. That background is far enough away and underexposed the "right" amount. I don't think you need to do anything differently with that shot.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
egordon99
Cream of the Crop
10,247 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Philly 'burbs
     
Jul 02, 2010 08:44 |  #12

gonzogolf wrote in post #10465403 (external link)
Provided you have enough flash power to compensate for the loss to the ND filter then you can go that route. .

Since both flashes were already at full power, ND filters won't work :)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
30,917 posts
Gallery: 561 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 14912
Joined Dec 2006
     
Jul 02, 2010 09:11 |  #13

egordon99 wrote in post #10465829 (external link)
Since both flashes were already at full power, ND filters won't work :)

Those were 580's, he is talking about getting into alien bees.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
30,917 posts
Gallery: 561 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 14912
Joined Dec 2006
     
Jul 02, 2010 09:16 |  #14

vinnie6756 wrote in post #10464215 (external link)
Reduce the power of the AB. If you want to shoot wide open, go to 1/8 or 1/16 power. You have 6 stops of lighting power so I see no reason why this won't work unless I missing something.

What you are missing is that you have to keep your aperture closed down, or use Neutral Density filters to keep from overexposing the image with the ambient daylight. if the ambient light requires f/11 at 100 ISO without a flash to get the effect he wants you would have to bump that to f/16 or f/22 just to underexpose the background. You have to increase the flash power to overcome that increased darkening of the ambient. ND filters can counteract the closing down of the aperture, but after say 4 stops, they become a bit tough to work with.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
egordon99
Cream of the Crop
10,247 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Philly 'burbs
     
Jul 02, 2010 09:18 |  #15

gonzogolf wrote in post #10465956 (external link)
Those were 580's, he is talking about getting into alien bees.

DOAH, you're right. Get some AB1600s, you'll be set!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,862 views & 0 likes for this thread, 5 members have posted to it.
alien bee and wireless trigger question
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is icebergchick
1512 guests, 167 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.