Anyone tried this?

Here is a Flickr link: http://www.flickr.com …/43894176@N07/4​045561377/

Could be very interesting to give it a try but right now I don't have any lens with the aperture ring. All my lenses are Canon so any solution for doing it without the aperture settings available?
I guess I will have to do 2 exposures due to the in camera aperture setting

It might work without changing the aperture. With your 10-22mm set at the shortest fl and widest aperture you're still going to have a huge depth-of field. So you could follow the same steps but leave the aperture at f3.5 when you change from far to near focus.

How do you adjust the focus without jogging the camera a bit and screwing up the image?!

hollis_f wrote in post #10470578
It might work without changing the aperture. With your 10-22mm set at the shortest fl and widest aperture you're still going to have a huge depth-of field. So you could follow the same steps but leave the aperture at f3.5 when you change from far to near focus.

Yes, I tried it on the the image below. I kept the aperture at 11.

Adrena1in wrote in post #10476759
How do you adjust the focus without jogging the camera a bit and screwing up the image?!

On a long exposure you can shake the camera quite a bit until it is noticed

I tried it with the b+w nd1000 filter on it.
This is a 100s exposure. So the last 10 s I adjusted the focus to 1m and it seems sharp all over IMO