About National Geographic 2345 (again)

Hi all,
I'm a new member of this forum. I found this place when I tried to find some information of the National Geographic 2345 camera bag. I read some review from Dicktay and Mizaki... Very good posts, but actually, I haven't had my needs.
I'm using Canon 50D (only body) + Carl Zeiss T* Distagon 28mm f/2 + Leitz Vario-Elmar R 80-200mm f/4.5. And these two lenses come with me all the time. My bag now is Lowepro Steath Reporter D400 AW, it's too big for me now, so I would like to buy a smaller bag. I specially like the National Geographic 2345. So my question is: How big is the NG 2345? It could cary my gear (above) or not?.
I can see this bag with Canon 70-200mm f/2.8L (non IS), but the lens must be under the body. That is not my respect... I would like to keep my Leitz beside the body with CZ 28mm f/2...
Now I need some advices
Thanks for reading my post!

tungh

I don't know about those lenses, but for comparison the bag could hold a 5d2 and 17-40 with hood attached, not reversed inside+a small prime lens/430EX. If the lens isn't attach, i've tried putting 2x 450D(s), 85 1.8 and 430 EX inside, plus the kit lens on the outside pocket.

I have no idea, but here are two reviews from this forum:

https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=435487


https://photography-on-the.net …p?t=404062&high​light=2345

Maybe it will give you some perspective.

t60p wrote in post #10479617
I have no idea, but here are two reviews from this forum:

https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=435487


https://photography-on-the.net …p?t=404062&high​light=2345

Maybe it will give you some perspective.

If you had read his post, you'd have noticed that he has already read them

If you move up in size to the 2475 then it is no problem.

I use the medium (2475) and it will hold my 1DIII with 70-200 f/2.8 mounted (lens down) plus another couple lenses and a flash

Yeah, the difference between the 2 models is pretty big. The 2345 is like half of the 2475