Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
Thread started 05 Jul 2010 (Monday) 12:17
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

FIlters

 
Mike787
Member
222 posts
Joined Dec 2009
     
Jul 05, 2010 12:17 |  #1

So I just picked up my first lens (other than the kit lens) and I was wondering if you guys knew of some affordable filter kits that I could benefit from? I also would love some reading to help me learn a little more about different filter uses and such (I get lost in the acronyms - vnd, gnd etc..). I read brian petersons book but that only touches on the subject. Thanks!


Canon EOS 1000D | Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 EX DG II | EF 50mm f/1.8 II | EF-S 18-55mm IS f/3.5-5.6
My Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mike_d
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,690 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 1074
Joined Aug 2009
     
Jul 05, 2010 12:22 |  #2

What are you trying to accomplish with the filters? I use a B+W circular polarizer and Lee 4" filters (just have one GND so far).




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mike787
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
222 posts
Joined Dec 2009
     
Jul 05, 2010 12:44 |  #3

The one I definitely would like is a polarizing filter. I feel a lot of my shots are degraded by glare and decreased contrast caused by reflections. I'm not exactly sure how I'd use a neutral density filter but I figure if I'm looking at kits I might as well check them out.


Canon EOS 1000D | Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 EX DG II | EF 50mm f/1.8 II | EF-S 18-55mm IS f/3.5-5.6
My Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mike_d
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,690 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 1074
Joined Aug 2009
     
Jul 05, 2010 12:52 |  #4

Mike787 wrote in post #10480713 (external link)
The one I definitely would like is a polarizing filter. I feel a lot of my shots are degraded by glare and decreased contrast caused by reflections. I'm not exactly sure how I'd use a neutral density filter but I figure if I'm looking at kits I might as well check them out.

A circular polarizer sounds like a great place to start. Don't cheap out on filters. Spend a little money and get a good quality one. Neutral density filters are typically used for things like flowing water where you want a slow shutter. Graduated neutral density filters are usually used in landscapes where you need to even out the brightness between the sky and the ground.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mike787
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
222 posts
Joined Dec 2009
     
Jul 05, 2010 12:57 |  #5

Ok thanks mike, can you guys recommend a good polarizer? I have an EOS Rebel xs and I'd like to get it for the efs 55 - 250mm I just got.


Canon EOS 1000D | Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 EX DG II | EF 50mm f/1.8 II | EF-S 18-55mm IS f/3.5-5.6
My Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nightdiver13
Unabashed nerd!
Avatar
2,272 posts
Likes: 38
Joined May 2010
Location: Bigfoot Country
     
Jul 05, 2010 13:18 |  #6

I recommend either the Hoya HD or one of the B+W MRC offerings.


Neil

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
argyle
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,187 posts
Likes: 24
Joined Apr 2007
Location: DFW, Texas
     
Jul 05, 2010 13:26 |  #7

Mike787 wrote in post #10480601 (external link)
So I just picked up my first lens (other than the kit lens) and I was wondering if you guys knew of some affordable filter kits that I could benefit from? I also would love some reading to help me learn a little more about different filter uses and such (I get lost in the acronyms - vnd, gnd etc..). I read brian petersons book but that only touches on the subject. Thanks!

Try this link...read up on the circular polarizer (CPL), Neutral Density (ND), and Graduated Neutral Density (GND). These are about the only filters you'll need as far as digital photography goes.

Filters by Thom Hogan (external link)


"Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life, son". - Dean Wormer

GEAR LIST

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mike_d
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,690 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 1074
Joined Aug 2009
     
Jul 05, 2010 13:30 |  #8

Nightdiver13 wrote in post #10480877 (external link)
I recommend either the Hoya HD or one of the B+W MRC offerings.

That's what I have. Very nice filter. I recommend getting one that fits the largest diameter lens you have or soon expect to have. You can get step up rings for your smaller lenses. That way, you don't need to buy an expensive filter in different sizes.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mike787
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
222 posts
Joined Dec 2009
     
Jul 05, 2010 13:36 |  #9

Ok, sorry for all the questions, but what size should I get? What do those focal lengths denote?


Canon EOS 1000D | Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 EX DG II | EF 50mm f/1.8 II | EF-S 18-55mm IS f/3.5-5.6
My Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mike_d
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,690 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 1074
Joined Aug 2009
     
Jul 05, 2010 13:44 |  #10

Mike787 wrote in post #10480959 (external link)
Ok, sorry for all the questions, but what size should I get? What do those focal lengths denote?

Focal length isn't an issue except for determining if a filter will cause vignetting (darkening of the corners). The thicker the filter, or the farther out the holder protrudes, the sooner it'll vignette. This is why companies like B+W make slim filters and Lee makes a wide angle adapter ring. This is usually only a problem when you get very wide, like under 20mm on a full frame.

The other number is the diameter of your lens' filter threads. This could be a number like 58mm, 72mm, 77mm, etc. You can put a 77mm filter on a 58mm lens with an adapter but you can't do the reverse without severe vignetting. Step up rings will prevent you from using a hood though.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nightdiver13
Unabashed nerd!
Avatar
2,272 posts
Likes: 38
Joined May 2010
Location: Bigfoot Country
     
Jul 05, 2010 13:45 |  #11

edit: mike_d beat me to it.


Neil

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nightdiver13
Unabashed nerd!
Avatar
2,272 posts
Likes: 38
Joined May 2010
Location: Bigfoot Country
     
Jul 05, 2010 13:49 |  #12

I will add that trying to use a CPL with a hood on is a frustrating endeavor, at least for me.


Neil

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mike_d
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,690 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 1074
Joined Aug 2009
     
Jul 05, 2010 13:55 |  #13

Nightdiver13 wrote in post #10481026 (external link)
I will add that trying to use a CPL with a hood on is a frustrating endeavor, at least for me.

Yeah it depends on the hood. The hood on my 17-40 is so wide and shallow that I can manage but anything deeper is tough.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mike787
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
222 posts
Joined Dec 2009
     
Jul 05, 2010 13:56 |  #14

mike_d wrote in post #10481005 (external link)
Focal length isn't an issue except for determining if a filter will cause vignetting (darkening of the corners). The thicker the filter, or the farther out the holder protrudes, the sooner it'll vignette. This is why companies like B+W make slim filters and Lee makes a wide angle adapter ring. This is usually only a problem when you get very wide, like under 20mm on a full frame.

The other number is the diameter of your lens' filter threads. This could be a number like 58mm, 72mm, 77mm, etc. You can put a 77mm filter on a 58mm lens with an adapter but you can't do the reverse without severe vignetting. Step up rings will prevent you from using a hood though.

Ok so I'm on BH's website and I see various filters that all say 37mm, 40mm etc... it doesn't matter which one I choose? I have an efs 55-250mm that I would use these with and no previous filters (would I have to get a holder or does it come with it?) Thanks guys!


Canon EOS 1000D | Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 EX DG II | EF 50mm f/1.8 II | EF-S 18-55mm IS f/3.5-5.6
My Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nightdiver13
Unabashed nerd!
Avatar
2,272 posts
Likes: 38
Joined May 2010
Location: Bigfoot Country
     
Jul 05, 2010 14:06 |  #15

It matters! If the only lens you own is the 55-250, you want a 58mm filter. It will screw onto the threads of your lens.


Neil

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,383 views & 0 likes for this thread, 5 members have posted to it.
FIlters
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ANebinger
919 guests, 150 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.