Aside from the price factor, would it be wise to switch from the 85 1.8 to a 135L? Both lenses would be used for family/children photography/portraits and such.
Any advice is appreciated.
Corser1 Senior Member 428 posts Joined Oct 2008 Location: Bay Area, California More info | Jul 08, 2010 19:29 | #1 Aside from the price factor, would it be wise to switch from the 85 1.8 to a 135L? Both lenses would be used for family/children photography/portraits and such. Ray: Canon 5DII / 30D / 24-70L / 85 1.8 / Alien Bees 800 / Canon Speedlites
LOG IN TO REPLY |
nightcat Goldmember 4,533 posts Likes: 28 Joined Aug 2008 More info | Jul 08, 2010 19:44 | #2 You have a FF camera and there's no better lens for portraits in my opinion than the 135mm 2.0. The 135mm 2.0 is also one of the sharpest lenses Canon makes. The 85mm 1.8 is nice, but I'll take the 135mm 2.0. You have the 24-70mm if you need a shorter focal range.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
bohdank Cream of the Crop 14,060 posts Likes: 6 Joined Jan 2008 Location: Montreal, Canada More info | Jul 08, 2010 19:48 | #3 I have and use both. Bohdan - I may be, and probably am, completely wrong.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
samurairx7 Goldmember 1,045 posts Joined Aug 2008 Location: Chi-City 312 More info | Jul 08, 2010 20:14 | #4 If i had the choice i would jump to the 135L in a heartbeat =) although i do love the 85 1.8 also
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 09, 2010 01:12 | #5 Thanks everyone..... Ya I do love the 85's size, speed and sharpness. Just trying to see if the 135 would benefit my shoots that will be mainly outdoor family/children shoots. Ray: Canon 5DII / 30D / 24-70L / 85 1.8 / Alien Bees 800 / Canon Speedlites
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gte357s Senior Member 489 posts Joined Mar 2009 More info | 135L is an amazing lens, extremely sharp at F2, and creamy bokeh, but I found the 135L is too long sometimes for indoor, 85mm would be better. 135L has better PQ, but I think the 85 is 95% of it. Plus, the 85 is alot cheaper, the 135 is almost 3x the price. I also have a 24-70, so, the 135 covers a longer focal length, that is a plus. Although I keep my 135L, one of the major reason is I don't want to sell it and lose money. Canon 5D MK I | Canon 24-70 F2.8 L | Canon 70-200 F2.8 L IS I | Sigma 85 F1.4 | Tamron 1.4x TC | Canon 430 EXII
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Cham_001 Senior Member 880 posts Likes: 58 Joined Feb 2009 Location: based between Ruse, Bulgaria & Recife-Brazil More info | Jul 09, 2010 02:48 | #7 Hi, "... with a clear perspective - the confusion is clearer ..."
LOG IN TO REPLY |
hennie Goldmember More info | Jul 09, 2010 02:49 | #8 make the switch and never look back.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jericobot Cream of the Crop 5,128 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jun 2010 Location: preppingforthetrumpets More info | Jul 09, 2010 03:44 | #9 135L is my next goal. Get it, asap α7ii + (batis 25 f2 / zeiss 55 f1,8 / macro 90 f2,8)
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jdang307 Senior Member 780 posts Joined Aug 2009 More info | Jul 09, 2010 03:48 | #10 The 85mm 1.8 was my fav lens on crop. Didn't like the 50mm length on crop, was so awkward.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
SchnellerGT Senior Member 585 posts Joined Apr 2007 Location: Washington, DC More info | I recently rented both the 135L and 85/1.8 and as much as I wanted to fall in love with the 135, I found it to be too long for my purposes, indoors especially. Canon EOS 5D Mark II | Canon 24-70 2.8L II [FONT=Tahoma][SIZE=2][FONT=Tahoma][SIZE=2][FONT=Tahoma]| Canon 40mm Pancake | Canon EF 85 1.8 USM | Canon EF 135 F2L USM | Canon Speedlite 430 EX
LOG IN TO REPLY |
sebr Goldmember 4,628 posts Likes: 9 Joined Jan 2007 Location: Sweden/France More info | Jul 09, 2010 06:33 | #12 It is a matter of focal length more than IQ. I find 85mm is a more versatile FL for indoor family/children shots, unless you like tight portraits. Not a problem outdoors. Sebastien
LOG IN TO REPLY |
AJG1 Senior Member 555 posts Likes: 4 Joined Feb 2009 More info | Jul 09, 2010 10:17 | #13 Just got my 135L in the last hour!.....staggeringly sharp!!!! Yet to find out if it's too long or not. Flick
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DStanic Cream of the Crop 6,148 posts Likes: 7 Joined Oct 2007 Location: Canada More info | Jul 09, 2010 11:56 | #14 My wedding photographer (whom I have worked with as well) used to use crop and 85mm, then he got a 5DmkII (I bought the 30D and 40d off him.. Sony A6000, 16-50PZ, 55-210, 35mm 1.8 OSS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
aboss3 Goldmember 2,616 posts Joined Jan 2010 Location: LOS ANGELES More info | Jul 09, 2010 12:26 | #15 Permanent ban135L is really good on full frame. If you have extra cash, this should be a no-brainer. The only thing is: it will be tight indoors. I used my 85mm on a crop (equivalent to 135 on full frame) for indoor sports competitions. It will be too long just shooting portraits, although you can fit in a nice head/shoulder portrait with it. But you have to stand 15+ ft away from the subject to fit the whole body shots. Gear | My gear is changing faster than I can update the signature
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is AlainPre 1727 guests, 159 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||