1
 | Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE |
2
| Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE |
3
| Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE |
4
| Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE |
friesr Member 177 posts Joined Mar 2009 Location: Colorado More info | Jul 11, 2010 20:52 | #1 1
2
3
4
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 12, 2010 11:32 | #2 In photo 1, I did not feel there was enough to separate the three rock formations as there is in photo 2, but photo 2 does not have the scale and depth of photo 1.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Maybe color?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
georgebowman Goldmember  1,510 posts Likes: 2 Joined May 2009 Location: Verona, WI More info | Jul 13, 2010 05:04 | #4 I'm a sucker for B+W so I prefer the first set of posts altough I agree wider would have been better. What lens were you using? Very nice images. My Gear: 7d, XTi, 17-55f2.8 EF-S, 70-200f4L, 28-135 Kit lens, 2-580EXii
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 13, 2010 07:38 | #5 georgebowman wrote in post #10526349  I'm a sucker for B+W so I prefer the first set of posts altough I agree wider would have been better. What lens were you using? Very nice images. Just the 24-70, been eyeing the Sig12-24 but hoping Canon will do a 12-24L
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MatthewW Senior Member 304 posts Likes: 1 Joined Nov 2009 Location: Sydney, Australia More info | Jul 13, 2010 08:09 | #6 Yeah...a 12-24L would be very nice. Canon 5DMKIII, 24-105L, 70-200L f2.8IS, 50 1.4
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 13, 2010 08:55 | #7 Great shots friesr ! I prefer the color but both sets are very good ! I'll post more of mine later as i process them from RAW .
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ChasWG Goldmember  3,640 posts Likes: 13 Joined Aug 2009 Location: Aurora, CO More info | Jul 13, 2010 11:23 | #8 I love the first one in B&W and the rest in Color. The last one just doen't get it for me. I can see what you were thinking. It's just that the light was failing you on that one. It's just too flat over all. Chas Gordon
LOG IN TO REPLY |
irishman Goldmember  4,098 posts Likes: 14 Joined Jul 2007 Location: Scottsdale, AZ More info | Jul 13, 2010 11:32 | #9 I prefer the color versions as well. You might consider adding a close foreground element to increase your depth of field. Nice work. 6D, G9, Sigma 50 1.4, Sigma 15mm Fisheye, Sigma 50 2.8 macro, Nikon 14-24G 2.8, Canon 16-35 2.8 II, Canon 24-105 f/4 IS, Canon 70-200 2.8 IS, tripod, lights, other stuff.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
georgebowman Goldmember 1,510 posts Likes: 2 Joined May 2009 Location: Verona, WI More info | Jul 28, 2010 23:28 | #10 I'll second the Canon 12-24L. Canon really needs to fill that void. My Gear: 7d, XTi, 17-55f2.8 EF-S, 70-200f4L, 28-135 Kit lens, 2-580EXii
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is NekoZ8 1077 guests, 106 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
