Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Astronomy & Celestial 
Thread started 12 Jul 2010 (Monday) 12:47
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

First attempt at Milky Way

 
socalrailfan
Goldmember
Avatar
1,475 posts
Likes: 45
Joined Jun 2008
Location: Riverside, CA
     
Jul 12, 2010 12:47 |  #1

Not sure what I'm doing wrong. I turned on my NR but don't think it was working, there was a ton of noise, but Topaz Denise fixed that. Canon 40D, 36sec, 10mm, f3.5, iso1600. Shot at 2144hrs on 7/7 at Valley of Fire State Park in Nevada.

IMAGE: http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4098/4784073073_b850878bc1_b.jpg

Dave - Riverside, CA PhotographersNature.co​m (external link)
Canon 60D & 40D. Canon 24-105 L, 10-22, 100mmL 50mm 1.4 and 70-300 L lenses.
My photos on Flickr (external link), my Google Earth/Panoramio photos (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
thenextguy
Goldmember
Avatar
2,583 posts
Gallery: 105 photos
Best ofs: 8
Likes: 6504
Joined Feb 2010
Location: Las Vegas, NV
     
Jul 12, 2010 19:24 |  #2

Not bad. I think your selected exposure should work fine. How's the light pollution in that area? From what I can gather, it looks like some Vegas light bleeds into that area. So that may be hurting your shot a bit.


Steve -- Website (external link) -- Instagram (external link) -- 500px (external link)
Canon 5Ds R | 24-70L f/2.8 II | 35 F2 IS | 50mm f/1.4 | 70-200L f/2.8 II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
socalrailfan
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,475 posts
Likes: 45
Joined Jun 2008
Location: Riverside, CA
     
Jul 13, 2010 12:19 |  #3

Light pollution wasn't bad at all. Las Vegas glow was 90 degrees tomy right and not that bad. I should have waited a few hours and let the darkness really set in.


Dave - Riverside, CA PhotographersNature.co​m (external link)
Canon 60D & 40D. Canon 24-105 L, 10-22, 100mmL 50mm 1.4 and 70-300 L lenses.
My photos on Flickr (external link), my Google Earth/Panoramio photos (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mtbdudex
Goldmember
Avatar
1,674 posts
Gallery: 35 photos
Likes: 193
Joined Nov 2009
Location: SE Michigan
     
Jul 13, 2010 13:35 |  #4

socalrailfan wrote in post #10528232 (external link)
Light pollution wasn't bad at all. Las Vegas glow was 90 degrees tomy right and not that bad. I should have waited a few hours and let the darkness really set in.

Nice shot. I'm in SE Mich and need to wait 60-90 minutes post sunset minimum to get decent black skies. Means 11:30pm or later, prior to WWII Michigan was in central time zone but due to war effort move to eastern time zone for easy shipping coordination, and never moved back! If you are in upper peninsula of Michigan on west end its light really late....guess not as bad as some countries where there is only 1 time zone.....


Mike R, P.E. ...iMac 27"(i7), iPad2, iPhone14Pro, AppleTV4K, MacBook
Canon: Body R5, lens RF 24-105mm L F4, RF 100-500mm f/4.5-7.1L, 1.4 TC, EF 70-200 L f2.8 IS II / TC 1.4x 2x
FEISOL tripod CT-3441S + CB-40D Ball Head
My top 10 in Astrophotography. . .DIY acoustic panels (external link) . . APOD Aug-5-2011 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
David ­ Ransley
Senior Member
Avatar
673 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 14
Joined Aug 2008
Location: Johannesburg, South Africa
     
Jul 13, 2010 17:05 |  #5

You will always see some advice on the ISO rating. I zapped down to 800 for the 40D and it does wonders. It doesn't feel right but with post processing you still get the results. Logic says, stars are faint and therefore the ISO 1600. In reality, the lower ISOs are fine.

Like your shot though - it looks great.


DRH

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
socalrailfan
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,475 posts
Likes: 45
Joined Jun 2008
Location: Riverside, CA
     
Jul 13, 2010 17:20 |  #6

I think the problem with low iso is getting enough light in without blurring the stars from movement. There was great iso comparision here: http://forums.canonpho​togroup.com/showthread​.php?p=5225 (external link)

But for some reason I can't access it register. Maybe if someone is a member there they can share the info.


Dave - Riverside, CA PhotographersNature.co​m (external link)
Canon 60D & 40D. Canon 24-105 L, 10-22, 100mmL 50mm 1.4 and 70-300 L lenses.
My photos on Flickr (external link), my Google Earth/Panoramio photos (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
David ­ Ransley
Senior Member
Avatar
673 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 14
Joined Aug 2008
Location: Johannesburg, South Africa
     
Jul 14, 2010 00:41 |  #7

:-( CanonPhotoGroup :-(

We've moved!

Due to low participation, we decided to shut down the forums and move to a Facebook group that is located at http://www.facebook.co​m/group.php?gid=126427​004055342 (external link) - Please feel free to join us!

These forums will remain online temporarily as a read-only archive. Please save off any content that you with to retain.


DRH

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lowner
"I'm the original idiot"
Avatar
12,924 posts
Likes: 18
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Salisbury, UK.
     
Jul 14, 2010 04:35 |  #8

It's years since I last saw the Milky Way. And as a sailor I'm often out in complete dark, we saw it for no more than twenty minutes during a 5 day delivery trip while south of Ireland.

Sad is'nt it?


Richard

http://rcb4344.zenfoli​o.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ejicon
Goldmember
Avatar
1,920 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Hollywood, California
     
Jul 14, 2010 17:51 |  #9

Lowner wrote in post #10533081 (external link)
It's years since I last saw the Milky Way. And as a sailor I'm often out in complete dark, we saw it for no more than twenty minutes during a 5 day delivery trip while south of Ireland.

Sad is'nt it?


I could only imagine what that would look like... wow.


5D & 30D| Canon 16-35ii f/2.8 L USM| Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM | Canon 70-200mm f/2.8L USM | Canon EF 100 f/ 2.8 Macro USM

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Scottdog129
Senior Member
Avatar
637 posts
Joined Sep 2009
Location: Reno, Nevada USA
     
Jul 15, 2010 15:17 |  #10

Nice shot. It'd be really neat (if you were close enough to them) to light up those mountains with a spotlight of some sort.


Scott Thompson - www.sthompsonphoto.com (external link)
Canon EOS 30D - Canon 18-55mm f/3.5 - Sigma 10-20mm f/4 DSM -Canon 55-250mm IS - Canon 50mm f/1.8 II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,585 views & 0 likes for this thread, 7 members have posted to it.
First attempt at Milky Way
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Astronomy & Celestial 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Thunderstream
2117 guests, 97 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.