Not sure what I'm doing wrong. I turned on my NR but don't think it was working, there was a ton of noise, but Topaz Denise fixed that. Canon 40D, 36sec, 10mm, f3.5, iso1600. Shot at 2144hrs on 7/7 at Valley of Fire State Park in Nevada.
socalrailfan Goldmember 1,475 posts Likes: 45 Joined Jun 2008 Location: Riverside, CA More info | Jul 12, 2010 12:47 | #1 Not sure what I'm doing wrong. I turned on my NR but don't think it was working, there was a ton of noise, but Topaz Denise fixed that. Canon 40D, 36sec, 10mm, f3.5, iso1600. Shot at 2144hrs on 7/7 at Valley of Fire State Park in Nevada. Dave - Riverside, CA PhotographersNature.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
thenextguy Goldmember More info | Jul 12, 2010 19:24 | #2 Not bad. I think your selected exposure should work fine. How's the light pollution in that area? From what I can gather, it looks like some Vegas light bleeds into that area. So that may be hurting your shot a bit. Steve -- Website
LOG IN TO REPLY |
socalrailfan THREAD STARTER Goldmember 1,475 posts Likes: 45 Joined Jun 2008 Location: Riverside, CA More info | Jul 13, 2010 12:19 | #3 Light pollution wasn't bad at all. Las Vegas glow was 90 degrees tomy right and not that bad. I should have waited a few hours and let the darkness really set in. Dave - Riverside, CA PhotographersNature.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 13, 2010 13:35 | #4 socalrailfan wrote in post #10528232 Light pollution wasn't bad at all. Las Vegas glow was 90 degrees tomy right and not that bad. I should have waited a few hours and let the darkness really set in. Nice shot. I'm in SE Mich and need to wait 60-90 minutes post sunset minimum to get decent black skies. Means 11:30pm or later, prior to WWII Michigan was in central time zone but due to war effort move to eastern time zone for easy shipping coordination, and never moved back! If you are in upper peninsula of Michigan on west end its light really late....guess not as bad as some countries where there is only 1 time zone..... Mike R, P.E. ...iMac 27"(i7), iPad2, iPhone14Pro, AppleTV4K, MacBook
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DavidRansley Senior Member More info | Jul 13, 2010 17:05 | #5 You will always see some advice on the ISO rating. I zapped down to 800 for the 40D and it does wonders. It doesn't feel right but with post processing you still get the results. Logic says, stars are faint and therefore the ISO 1600. In reality, the lower ISOs are fine. DRH
LOG IN TO REPLY |
socalrailfan THREAD STARTER Goldmember 1,475 posts Likes: 45 Joined Jun 2008 Location: Riverside, CA More info | Jul 13, 2010 17:20 | #6 I think the problem with low iso is getting enough light in without blurring the stars from movement. There was great iso comparision here: http://forums.canonphotogroup.com/showthread.php?p=5225 Dave - Riverside, CA PhotographersNature.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DavidRansley Senior Member More info | Jul 14, 2010 00:41 | #7
DRH
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Lowner "I'm the original idiot" 12,924 posts Likes: 18 Joined Jul 2007 Location: Salisbury, UK. More info | Jul 14, 2010 04:35 | #8 It's years since I last saw the Milky Way. And as a sailor I'm often out in complete dark, we saw it for no more than twenty minutes during a 5 day delivery trip while south of Ireland. Richard
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ejicon Goldmember 1,920 posts Likes: 6 Joined Dec 2006 Location: Hollywood, California More info | Jul 14, 2010 17:51 | #9 Lowner wrote in post #10533081 It's years since I last saw the Milky Way. And as a sailor I'm often out in complete dark, we saw it for no more than twenty minutes during a 5 day delivery trip while south of Ireland. Sad is'nt it?
5D & 30D| Canon 16-35ii f/2.8 L USM| Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM | Canon 70-200mm f/2.8L USM | Canon EF 100 f/ 2.8 Macro USM
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Scottdog129 Senior Member 637 posts Joined Sep 2009 Location: Reno, Nevada USA More info | Jul 15, 2010 15:17 | #10 Nice shot. It'd be really neat (if you were close enough to them) to light up those mountains with a spotlight of some sort. Scott Thompson - www.sthompsonphoto.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Thunderstream 2117 guests, 97 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||