Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion People 
Thread started 12 Jul 2010 (Monday) 16:36
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

which lens would you use for a family portrait on the beach?

 
markmm
Member
153 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2009
Location: jax, fl
     
Jul 12, 2010 16:36 |  #1

17-40 or 70-200 2.8? im going to do a family portrait for some friends of mine and i know the 70-200's abilities for portrait work but id like to use my 17-40 more. i guess i could swap them out as i go but im wondering what would be your first choice. also, i mat be doing some ocf with 2 speedlights if lighting calls for it.


1d mk II-canon 70-200 2.8-sigma 17-70-420 ex speedlight
Feedback: musso (buyer), photopat (seller), bob tilton (seller)
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/44672638@N05/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
suecassidy
Goldmember
Avatar
4,102 posts
Likes: 37
Joined May 2007
Location: Huntington Beach California
     
Jul 12, 2010 20:02 |  #2

I would probably use them both in a beach sitting. You will want to use the 17-40 to capture lots of the beach setting without having to get back too far. Don't get too close to the people as wide angle lenses can distort people when used incorrectly. The 70-200 is a very flattering lens for portraits, so you will use it as well, just in a different way. Bring 'em both.


Sue Cassidy
GEAR: Canon 1ds, Canon 1d Mark iii, Sony RX 100, Canon 50mmL 1.2, Canon 70-200L 2.8 IS, Canon 100-400L IS, Canon 14mm L, 2.8, . Lighting: Elinchrom Rangers, D-lite 400s, Canon 580/550 flashes. 74 ' Octabank, 27' Rotalux. Editing: Aperture 3

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
akipics
Member
Avatar
44 posts
Joined May 2010
Location: Seattle, washington
     
Jul 15, 2010 17:39 |  #3

use 17-40 only when you want to capture mainly background.
usually use 70-200


http://tonyivanh.weebl​y.com/ (external link)
Visit my website

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
msfvirginia
Senior Member
441 posts
Joined Feb 2010
     
Jul 21, 2010 22:44 |  #4

the longer the lens the more flattering it tends to be. :)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,502 views & 0 likes for this thread, 4 members have posted to it.
which lens would you use for a family portrait on the beach?
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion People 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ANebinger
929 guests, 147 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.