Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos The Business of Photography 
Thread started 14 Jul 2010 (Wednesday) 18:43
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Base Wedding Package

 
drdiesel1
Goldmember
Avatar
4,043 posts
Gallery: 86 photos
Likes: 1699
Joined Dec 2008
Location: NorCal
     
Jul 14, 2010 18:43 |  #1

I need to outline a base wedding package and need help.

I have a studio owner as a partner, but I need to define my base package.

I was thinking about something along the lines of: Base price $1500.00 CA Bay Area.
Covering pre-wedding, wedding ceremony, formal shots, reception up to the first dance with a photo CD of 150 shots and 15 re-touched images.
I also want to add on some extras as an upgrade to the base package.

Complete wedding coverage for a full day and engagement coverage too.
Wedding album and prints.

Could anyone help me out line this type of package. I need to submit it ASAP.

Some other questions:
How many photos would be appropriate for a wedding album ?
How many re-touched photo's should be offered ?
Is 8 hours considered a full day with 6 being a base and 4 being half ?
Do you watermark your photos on the CD ?
Do you require all prints to be purchased though you ?
How do you stop them from printing off the supplied CD ?

Thanks in advance :D


Nikon D810 Nikon 50F/1.4G - Nikon 70-200F/2.8II
Canon 5DMKIII - Canon 24-105F/4L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nicksan
Man I Like to Fart
Avatar
24,738 posts
Likes: 53
Joined Oct 2006
Location: NYC
     
Jul 14, 2010 21:38 |  #2

I wouldn't piece meal the hours like that. Just say you'll be there for the entire day, typically 8-10 hours. Otherwise I think clients might get the feeling you are going to try to nickel and dime them, no?

Same thing with the CD. 150 images and 15 re-touched images?

I usually process all of my images regardless. Just price appropriately then present them the packages. This way it's nice and simple...

Just my opinion...




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Jul 14, 2010 22:26 |  #3

I used to offer unlimited time, but after my first 14 hour wedding I nixed that. I do 8 hour packages, additional time is charged for at >$100/hr. People will take advantage of you if you offer unlimited, especially at the low end of the market.

I wouldn't offer retouched images in the package. $1500 for coverage and a CD is already cheap, if you're any good. 150 shots is too low, give them all the images worth seeing, or don't give them any, IMHO. Giving them some is just a pita for everyone. Don't watermark high res images - put yourself in their shoes.

Albums vary between 30 and 100 images. Typically 2.5 images per page for me, with 20-50 pages normal, average around 30.

If you supply a CD they will print from it. That's the point. You can't get around it, don't even try.

I think you need to do more reading and research, most of your ideas seem pretty poor to me.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
drdiesel1
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
4,043 posts
Gallery: 86 photos
Likes: 1699
Joined Dec 2008
Location: NorCal
     
Jul 15, 2010 01:39 |  #4

tim wrote in post #10538698 (external link)
I used to offer unlimited time, but after my first 14 hour wedding I nixed that. I do 8 hour packages, additional time is charged for at >$100/hr. People will take advantage of you if you offer unlimited, especially at the low end of the market.

I wouldn't offer retouched images in the package. $1500 for coverage and a CD is already cheap, if you're any good. 150 shots is too low, give them all the images worth seeing, or don't give them any, IMHO. Giving them some is just a pita for everyone. Don't watermark high res images - put yourself in their shoes.

Albums vary between 30 and 100 images. Typically 2.5 images per page for me, with 20-50 pages normal, average around 30.

If you supply a CD they will print from it. That's the point. You can't get around it, don't even try.

I think you need to do more reading and research, most of your ideas seem pretty poor to me.


That was my concern. People tend to abuse good intentions and generosity :lol:
The studio has a base time of 6 hours, so I need to follow they're base time frame. Anything outside of the 6 hours needs to be an upgrade per the studio layout. He's handling everything except the photography and has me as a sub contractor.
I agree that my ideas are poor and that's why I'm asking for any help and input I can get.
Should I offer prints instead of a CD ? and what if they ask for a CD ?
The studio has a base package fee of 1500 with a percentage off the top between us. I also have complete access to the studio for anything else I need other than the wedding gigs. He wants a base package to offer each client with upgrades to be handled between the client and myself, if they're looking for more coverage or special images. I would also like to offer a package with an engagement session and extended coverage.
I guess I should offer an album, instead of a CD. Any other advise or links to information would be very helpful.
This is overwhelming without a guideline to follow. Thank you.


Nikon D810 Nikon 50F/1.4G - Nikon 70-200F/2.8II
Canon 5DMKIII - Canon 24-105F/4L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Karl ­ Johnston
Cream of the Crop
9,334 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Jul 2008
     
Jul 15, 2010 02:02 |  #5
bannedPermanent ban

I don't have much wedding exp. Though I treat portraits like this...with packages they may purchase a high res CD for XXX $ extra on top.

it's easier to see than explain, so just check it out here;
http://www.karljohnsto​n.com/blog/services/po​rtrait/ (external link)


Adventurous Photographer, Writer (external link) & Wedding Photographer (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
drdiesel1
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
4,043 posts
Gallery: 86 photos
Likes: 1699
Joined Dec 2008
Location: NorCal
     
Jul 15, 2010 03:11 |  #6

Karl Johnston wrote in post #10539688 (external link)
I don't have much wedding exp. Though I treat portraits like this...with packages they may purchase a high res CD for XXX $ extra on top.

it's easier to see than explain, so just check it out here;
http://www.karljohnsto​n.com/blog/services/po​rtrait/ (external link)


Thanks for the link :cool: It really helps to see an outline.


Nikon D810 Nikon 50F/1.4G - Nikon 70-200F/2.8II
Canon 5DMKIII - Canon 24-105F/4L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Jul 15, 2010 04:47 |  #7

Portraits tend to be low upfront fee and very expensive later, hoping you make a big sale. Weddings tend to be a significant payment up front, and smaller payments later. That way you make a reasonable profit, and may make more later. You can also go for a reasonable up front fee and have everything else a la carte.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
drdiesel1
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
4,043 posts
Gallery: 86 photos
Likes: 1699
Joined Dec 2008
Location: NorCal
     
Jul 15, 2010 12:40 |  #8

tim wrote in post #10540107 (external link)
Portraits tend to be low upfront fee and very expensive later, hoping you make a big sale. Weddings tend to be a significant payment up front, and smaller payments later. That way you make a reasonable profit, and may make more later. You can also go for a reasonable up front fee and have everything else a la carte.


This is the plan. A base fee with all the extras "a la carte"


Nikon D810 Nikon 50F/1.4G - Nikon 70-200F/2.8II
Canon 5DMKIII - Canon 24-105F/4L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AD ­ Photography
Member
48 posts
Joined Feb 2010
Location: Florida
     
Jul 31, 2010 20:37 as a reply to  @ drdiesel1's post |  #9

Ok, maybe the best way for me to explain what I do is to list out one of my packages. My smallest package is 7 hours, online gallery for ordering and viewing, digital retouching on images, an engagement session (+ disc of images), a high resolution disc of edited images, and a proof magazine. I charge $2,050 for this package.

When coming up with my prices, I listed everything I wanted to offer (albums, discs of images, canvases, wedding-related sessions, etc.) I came up with a price per item. So for example, my time is $200/hour. Then I put together my "a la carte" items into packages. My largest package is 10 hours of photography and this is a LONG day. Eight hours is a good number of hours to get everything from getting ready shots thru the important portions of the reception (and a lot of times 8 hours is enough for the entire event). I definitely would have a time limit on your packages (i.e., do not say "unlimited" time).

Please DO NOT be one of those photographers who only offers their clients X number of edited images! No client wants that and most after they find out that's what you do will (a) not book you or (b) if they have already booked you, they will be pissed when they find out (this happened to a friend of mine). Granted I don't edit EVERY SINGLE photo I take. I may take anywhere between 1000-2000 photos at a wedding. In the end, the client gets every single one that I edit - which usually comes out to be 400-600 images (or approximately 40-60 images per hour that I work). The client then gets all of those edited images on their high resolution disc. And there is not a watermark on the images on the disc. My clients receive a "license to print" the images on the disc. This means they can print the photos out for their personal use. If you are offering a disc of images, the clients will want to print those photos. If you are looking for print sales after the wedding, then don't offer the disc. If someone creates a custom package through me, then to add a disc of images it costs $500. It's a lot of money, but I know that once they have the disc then I will not receive print sales. So I price accordingly. I do offer prints for sale (only through my professional printing company, which is also where I host the client's online gallery), but I bank most of my money up front on my packages and not necessarily on print sales after the fact.

Let's see, what else did you ask...... Oh albums. I generally offer 30 page albums, with approximately 60 images. I do a lot of one photo pages, and then some pages that may have 4 images. So it all evens out. But as a general rule, I double the number of pages the album is to get the number of images that will be in it.

So let's use you as an example:

Your studio's base time is 6 hours. So the base package could be:

6 hours wedding coverage
Online gallery of images (or how are you planning on sharing the images with the clients and their family/friends?)
Digital retouching on images
High resolution disc of images

That package could be $1500. Then anything over that is a la carte.

Some people feel differently, but I think you should include a disc of images in your packages. Every bride wants a disc of images and every one will ask you for one. If it's already included, they will appreciate that.

You said the studio's base package is $1500..... but it sounds like there really isn't a base package set yet?? How did the studio determine $1500 is the base price without have figured out what's in that package? I know in my area $1500 would be too much to charge for only 6 hours of time, online gallery, and digital retouching. But in your area (San Fran area?) then that may be appropriate. If so, then don't offer the disc of images in the base price and clients can always add it to the package if they want it. But remember, once people have the disc they most likely won't buy prints. So price the disc at a decent price (you'll make a lot of profit!).

I guess that's all. If you have any other questions, feel free to PM me! :)


--
Ashley Daniell Photography
www.ashleydaniellphoto​graphy.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
drdiesel1
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
4,043 posts
Gallery: 86 photos
Likes: 1699
Joined Dec 2008
Location: NorCal
     
Jul 31, 2010 21:01 |  #10

AD Photography wrote in post #10639218 (external link)
Ok, maybe the best way for me to explain what I do is to list out one of my packages. My smallest package is 7 hours, online gallery for ordering and viewing, digital retouching on images, an engagement session (+ disc of images), a high resolution disc of edited images, and a proof magazine. I charge $2,050 for this package.

When coming up with my prices, I listed everything I wanted to offer (albums, discs of images, canvases, wedding-related sessions, etc.) I came up with a price per item. So for example, my time is $200/hour. Then I put together my "a la carte" items into packages. My largest package is 10 hours of photography and this is a LONG day. Eight hours is a good number of hours to get everything from getting ready shots thru the important portions of the reception (and a lot of times 8 hours is enough for the entire event). I definitely would have a time limit on your packages (i.e., do not say "unlimited" time).

Please DO NOT be one of those photographers who only offers their clients X number of edited images! No client wants that and most after they find out that's what you do will (a) not book you or (b) if they have already booked you, they will be pissed when they find out (this happened to a friend of mine). Granted I don't edit EVERY SINGLE photo I take. I may take anywhere between 1000-2000 photos at a wedding. In the end, the client gets every single one that I edit - which usually comes out to be 400-600 images (or approximately 40-60 images per hour that I work). The client then gets all of those edited images on their high resolution disc. And there is not a watermark on the images on the disc. My clients receive a "license to print" the images on the disc. This means they can print the photos out for their personal use. If you are offering a disc of images, the clients will want to print those photos. If you are looking for print sales after the wedding, then don't offer the disc. If someone creates a custom package through me, then to add a disc of images it costs $500. It's a lot of money, but I know that once they have the disc then I will not receive print sales. So I price accordingly. I do offer prints for sale (only through my professional printing company, which is also where I host the client's online gallery), but I bank most of my money up front on my packages and not necessarily on print sales after the fact.

Let's see, what else did you ask...... Oh albums. I generally offer 30 page albums, with approximately 60 images. I do a lot of one photo pages, and then some pages that may have 4 images. So it all evens out. But as a general rule, I double the number of pages the album is to get the number of images that will be in it.

So let's use you as an example:

Your studio's base time is 6 hours. So the base package could be:

6 hours wedding coverage
Online gallery of images (or how are you planning on sharing the images with the clients and their family/friends?)
Digital retouching on images
High resolution disc of images

That package could be $1500. Then anything over that is a la carte.

Some people feel differently, but I think you should include a disc of images in your packages. Every bride wants a disc of images and every one will ask you for one. If it's already included, they will appreciate that.

You said the studio's base package is $1500..... but it sounds like there really isn't a base package set yet?? How did the studio determine $1500 is the base price without have figured out what's in that package? I know in my area $1500 would be too much to charge for only 6 hours of time, online gallery, and digital retouching. But in your area (San Fran area?) then that may be appropriate. If so, then don't offer the disc of images in the base price and clients can always add it to the package if they want it. But remember, once people have the disc they most likely won't buy prints. So price the disc at a decent price (you'll make a lot of profit!).

I guess that's all. If you have any other questions, feel free to PM me! :)

Thanks for taking the time to reply in such detail.
It really helps and I appreciate your input. Thanks for the offer to PM :cool:
I may take you up on that one ;)


Nikon D810 Nikon 50F/1.4G - Nikon 70-200F/2.8II
Canon 5DMKIII - Canon 24-105F/4L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pauld1946
Member
179 posts
Joined Jan 2010
Location: Wooster, OH
     
Jul 31, 2010 22:55 as a reply to  @ drdiesel1's post |  #11

Good stuff, Ashley. Made me think about what i am offering. May have to rethink a little. I like your extra high price for cd.


Paul Donihue,
www.PhotoExpressionsPl​ace.com (external link)
To Get What You Have Never Had, You Must Do What You Have Never Done!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PMCphotography
Goldmember
Avatar
1,775 posts
Joined Sep 2009
Location: Tasmania, Australia.
     
Aug 01, 2010 04:16 |  #12

drdiesel1 wrote in post #10542086 (external link)
This is the plan. A base fee with all the extras "a la carte"

I got tired of negotiations with packages, and decided to go with a base price and everything else a la carte. It works a lot better for me i've found.


Twitter (external link)
Hobart Wedding Photography (external link)
I have some camera stuff. Here it is.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
drdiesel1
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
4,043 posts
Gallery: 86 photos
Likes: 1699
Joined Dec 2008
Location: NorCal
     
Aug 01, 2010 04:21 |  #13

PMCphotography wrote in post #10640448 (external link)
I got tired of negotiations with packages, and decided to go with a base price and everything else a la carte. It works a lot better for me i've found.


Care to share some information with us ? Thanks :cool:


Nikon D810 Nikon 50F/1.4G - Nikon 70-200F/2.8II
Canon 5DMKIII - Canon 24-105F/4L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PMCphotography
Goldmember
Avatar
1,775 posts
Joined Sep 2009
Location: Tasmania, Australia.
     
Aug 01, 2010 05:35 |  #14

drdiesel1 wrote in post #10640454 (external link)
Care to share some information with us ? Thanks :cool:

Sure, what exactly would you like to know?


Twitter (external link)
Hobart Wedding Photography (external link)
I have some camera stuff. Here it is.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
drdiesel1
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
4,043 posts
Gallery: 86 photos
Likes: 1699
Joined Dec 2008
Location: NorCal
     
Aug 01, 2010 18:33 |  #15

PMCphotography wrote in post #10640556 (external link)
Sure, what exactly would you like to know?

Actually, I looked over your website and it answered my questions. Thanks


Nikon D810 Nikon 50F/1.4G - Nikon 70-200F/2.8II
Canon 5DMKIII - Canon 24-105F/4L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,248 views & 0 likes for this thread, 7 members have posted to it.
Base Wedding Package
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos The Business of Photography 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is griggt
1097 guests, 125 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.