I'd prefer somewhere between low, not shifted, and low, shifted down.
that's a tough shot, either way.
mikekelley THREAD STARTER "Meow! Bark! Honk! Hiss! Grrr! Tweet!" 7,317 posts Likes: 16 Joined Feb 2009 Location: Los Angeles, CA More info | Oct 27, 2010 00:20 | #331 I'd prefer somewhere between low, not shifted, and low, shifted down. Los Angeles-Based Architectural, Interior, And Luxury Real Estate Photography
LOG IN TO REPLY |
djharmonix Goldmember 1,167 posts Likes: 1 Joined Feb 2007 More info | Oct 27, 2010 00:26 | #332 What I like about the higher position is that the view clears the counter top and the fourniture, you see more floor, more of the stove etc. There is more dirtortion and more wide-angle effect. Please, click ''LIKE'' on my facebook page for real estate photography! Thank you for your support!http://www.facebook.com/photoresidence
LOG IN TO REPLY |
itsmejson Goldmember 1,201 posts Joined Apr 2010 Location: Peoria, Arizona More info | Oct 27, 2010 00:36 | #333 mikekelley wrote in post #11172483 I'd prefer somewhere between low, not shifted, and low, shifted down. that's a tough shot, either way. i'm messing with it right now and its definitely tough lol. in your edited version of my pic did you have to patch the top left hand corner in? - 5DmarkII | EF 24-70L F2.8 | EF 70-200L F4 | 580EX II | Gitzo 1541T w/ Photoclam Pro-34NS -
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mikekelley THREAD STARTER "Meow! Bark! Honk! Hiss! Grrr! Tweet!" 7,317 posts Likes: 16 Joined Feb 2009 Location: Los Angeles, CA More info | Oct 27, 2010 00:43 | #334 Yup - had to do some quick clone work. I would have been more precise had this been for a client, but it gets the point across Los Angeles-Based Architectural, Interior, And Luxury Real Estate Photography
LOG IN TO REPLY |
itsmejson Goldmember 1,201 posts Joined Apr 2010 Location: Peoria, Arizona More info | Oct 27, 2010 00:52 | #335 TGrundvig wrote in post #11172375 I never stand upright and point down, you will always get results like this. The camera must be level. The best way to view this is to look through the viewfinder and make sure the vertical lines (walls, doors, etc.) are parallel with the sides of the frame. Most of the time, I squat down or take a knee (if hand held) or I lower the tripod to about 4 or 5 feet from the ground. This way you get an even balance of floor and ceiling and keep the image level. Thx for your experience. I'm going to try and see which works best but i need to get a tripod first! it was either the tripod or the tokie 11-16 djharmonix wrote in post #11172463 wow! nice success story! It helps with the motivation, thank you! Here's a test I did today. We were talking about the camera height position the other day. I took four shots, 2 different camera height, then shifted and not shifted. Those are simple raw conversion, not corrected for distortion or anything. High camera position - Shifted down ![]() So what do you prefer? mikekelley wrote in post #11172570 Yup - had to do some quick clone work. I would have been more precise had this been for a client, but it gets the point across ![]() haha for sure. I was just asking because i when I was trying to edit my version and i kept having that corner missing so I double checked urs to see if you did anything and I noticed you did a bit of cloning. I actually learned a lot in this exercise and was able to duplicate your version. - 5DmarkII | EF 24-70L F2.8 | EF 70-200L F4 | 580EX II | Gitzo 1541T w/ Photoclam Pro-34NS -
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mikekelley THREAD STARTER "Meow! Bark! Honk! Hiss! Grrr! Tweet!" 7,317 posts Likes: 16 Joined Feb 2009 Location: Los Angeles, CA More info | Oct 27, 2010 00:57 | #336 Awesome! Glad I could help Los Angeles-Based Architectural, Interior, And Luxury Real Estate Photography
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TGrundvig Goldmember 2,876 posts Likes: 3 Joined Oct 2009 Location: Colorado More info | Oct 27, 2010 08:01 | #337 itsmejson wrote in post #11172610 Thx for your experience. I'm going to try and see which works best but i need to get a tripod first! it was either the tripod or the tokie 11-16 If it is bright enough you can get away with hand held for a lot of shots. At least, that's how it is here in CO. I have shot entire homes hand held because it was so bright. Just practice getting the vertical lines straight. 1Ds Mk II, 1D Mk II, 50D, 40D, XT (for my son), 17-40L, 24-105L, Bigma 50-500 EX DG, Sigma 150 Macro EX DG, Tokina 12-24 AT-X, Nifty Fifty, Tamron 28-300 (for my son), 580ex II, 430ex II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
itsmejson Goldmember 1,201 posts Joined Apr 2010 Location: Peoria, Arizona More info | Oct 27, 2010 09:27 | #338 TGrundvig wrote in post #11173727 If it is bright enough you can get away with hand held for a lot of shots. At least, that's how it is here in CO. I have shot entire homes hand held because it was so bright. Just practice getting the vertical lines straight. grt thanks for the advice - 5DmarkII | EF 24-70L F2.8 | EF 70-200L F4 | 580EX II | Gitzo 1541T w/ Photoclam Pro-34NS -
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ChasP505 "brain damaged old guy" 5,566 posts Likes: 1 Joined Dec 2006 Location: New Mexico, USA More info | I want to offer a reality check... Like Mike, I'm actually a licensed real estate broker. I recently retired due to a medical issue, but for the last several years, a portion of my job in the corporate office of a major real estate firm was compiling market statistics and trends. Chas P
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ScottKCooper Goldmember 1,500 posts Joined Jan 2009 Location: Central, VA More info | Oct 27, 2010 10:52 | #340 Our area is turning around. I'm just getting into the business, but want to be certain that I have all the tools in the toolbox before I start promoting myself. I'm getting there, and am about ready. I have made a couple of calls, and offered introductory deals to get in the door. I think that a large percentage are taking snaps and calling it a listing. I hope to turn some of that around. I think the biggest issue is we want payment now for something the realtor may not even get sold. I'm not in a location with a lot of vacation rentals, so no go there. One way to go would be to be paid after the closing (sounds bad to me). I'm hoping not to have to do that. I am planning on selling as digital downloads, and let the ecommerce site collect the money for me - the risk? they don't like anything and don't buy - the advantage - you don't like anything, you don't pay. so for now, I'm either out up front, o.k., or out altogether. but this way the realtor can gracefully walk away. I hope the market turns around quickly, but don't imagine it will. https://photography-on-the.net …/showthread.php?t=1276863
LOG IN TO REPLY |
djharmonix Goldmember 1,167 posts Likes: 1 Joined Feb 2007 More info | Oct 27, 2010 10:53 | #341 it's FAR from being that bad in Canada, and the market is actually pretty healthy in Montreal. Please, click ''LIKE'' on my facebook page for real estate photography! Thank you for your support!http://www.facebook.com/photoresidence
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ToddLambert I don't like titles More info | Oct 27, 2010 11:08 | #342 Scott, maybe a combo of those scenarios might work for you.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ScottKCooper Goldmember 1,500 posts Joined Jan 2009 Location: Central, VA More info | Oct 27, 2010 11:17 | #343 Yes, I certainly would have a different price point if I was going to have to toss the dice with the realtor - however, it would add to the argument that a better set of photographs will help get people in the door, and being willing to wait would imply that I'm confident enough in my work to wait because I'm sure it will happen. The fun part would be tracking closings with all the realtors. I'm sure some would "forget" - and more than once. https://photography-on-the.net …/showthread.php?t=1276863
LOG IN TO REPLY |
djharmonix Goldmember 1,167 posts Likes: 1 Joined Feb 2007 More info | Oct 27, 2010 11:31 | #344 My customer pay me on the spot or after getting invoiced (when they receive the pictures). Please, click ''LIKE'' on my facebook page for real estate photography! Thank you for your support!http://www.facebook.com/photoresidence
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ChasP505 "brain damaged old guy" 5,566 posts Likes: 1 Joined Dec 2006 Location: New Mexico, USA More info | Oct 27, 2010 12:38 | #345 ScottKCooper wrote in post #11174693 Yes, I certainly would have a different price point if I was going to have to toss the dice with the realtor ... Just a reminder that the NAR is really touchy about the use of the word "realtor". It's not synonymous with real estate agent or broker, and in print, it has to be: REALTORĀ®. ScottKCooper wrote in post #11174693 Does anyone else wait until closing to be paid? In my area, photographers typically want payment on delivery. If under exclusive contract with a broker, common payment terms can be arranged. Waiting until closing for payment is an option I would never agree to. Deals fall through, contracts get canceled due to bad inspections, one buyer party loses his/her job, mortgage rates suddenly spike prior to closing, etc. Chas P
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is IoDaLi Photography 1770 guests, 116 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||