Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Architecture, Real-Estate & Buildings 
Thread started 15 Jul 2010 (Thursday) 14:37
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

A thread for real estate, architectural, and interior design photography

 
cccc
Goldmember
Avatar
2,017 posts
Gallery: 18 photos
Likes: 174
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Sacramento, CA
     
Jun 12, 2015 05:40 as a reply to  @ post 17594023 |  #7126

I brought a darker exposure through and added a light sky replacement. Skies were completely clear when I took the photo.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
digirebelva
Goldmember
Avatar
3,999 posts
Gallery: 376 photos
Likes: 1687
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Virginia
     
Jun 12, 2015 07:31 |  #7127

rgs wrote in post #17593703 (external link)
Not sure it looks blurry, but it does look a bit flat. I think I would lighten it up a bit and maybe boost the whites even more. I would like that white trim to be quite a bit brighter than the off white walls. As much as I like EF, it does tend to produce flat results. The new LR 6 HDR seems less inclined to do that.

Didnt have LR6 when I did this, do now, I do like the output from LR6, just wish it would allow you to run it against multiple stacks...


EOS 6d, 7dMKII, Tokina 11-16, Tokina 16-28, Sigma 70-200mm F/2.8, Sigma 17-50 F/2.8, Canon 24-70mm F/2.8L, Canon 70-200 F/2.8L, Mixed Speedlites and other stuff.

When it ceases to be fun, it will be time to walk away
Website (external link) | Fine Art America (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
i_am_hydrogen
Goldmember
Avatar
1,707 posts
Gallery: 38 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 217
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Chicago, IL
     
Jun 12, 2015 20:33 |  #7128

IMAGE: https://farm1.staticflickr.com/362/18515112566_e68dcc8f4b_b.jpg

flickr (external link) | Kevin

Canon 6D | Canon 5D II | Canon TS-E 17
L | Canon TS-E 24L | Canon TS-E 45 | Canon 135L | Canon 24-105 ISL

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ken ­ S.
Senior Member
435 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 41
Joined Apr 2008
Location: COVINGTON, LOUISIANA
     
Jun 12, 2015 21:28 |  #7129

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2015/06/2/LQ_732406.jpg
Image hosted by forum (732406) © Ken S. [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

Fuji XH1
Olympus EM1-ll

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TRhoads
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,867 posts
Gallery: 740 photos
Best ofs: 3
Likes: 20651
Joined Jun 2009
Location: Roswell, Georgia
     
Jun 13, 2015 07:17 |  #7130

i_am_hydrogen wrote in post #17594877 (external link)
QUOTED IMAGE

I wish the sky in Chicago looked like that right now... Been here 2+ days and it's been overcast and raining!


Website (external link) | YouTube (external link) | Instagram (external link) | The Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DisrupTer911
Goldmember
Avatar
2,455 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 29
Joined Jul 2008
Location: TN, USA
     
Jun 14, 2015 17:57 |  #7131

Looking for some C&C

7 shot merges in LRCC(6)

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2015/06/2/LQ_732722.jpg
Image hosted by forum (732722) © DisrupTer911 [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2015/06/2/LQ_732723.jpg
Image hosted by forum (732723) © DisrupTer911 [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

www.vividemotionphotograph​y.comexternal link

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dandingo
Senior Member
321 posts
Likes: 32
Joined Aug 2012
Location: SoCal
     
Jun 14, 2015 18:21 as a reply to  @ DisrupTer911's post |  #7132

Cool little condo in SoCal.

IMAGE: https://c1.staticflickr.com/9/8830/18818290781_a4e6a5b436_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/uEUE​ek  (external link) Living Room Windows (external link) by Dan Solomon (external link), on Flickr

FACEBOOK (external link)
GOOGLE+ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Luxury
Senior Member
Avatar
635 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 5
Joined Sep 2009
Location: Vancouver, BC
     
Jun 14, 2015 18:59 as a reply to  @ DisrupTer911's post |  #7133

Your lines are straight, but the strong warm cast on the left side of the image is distracting. If you could match the temperature of the left side of the image to the right, I think you'll have a much more effective image. Additionally, you could improve the focus by cropping out a significant amount of the ceiling.

For your bathroom shot, you would also be served well by cropping just above the glass door. Personally, I would have removed the towels and floor mat (kept the ones near the vanity). You could also cool down the image or reduce the saturation of the yellows.


Liam - A7r, Fuji x100, 450d and some other stuff. --- Flickr  (external link)--- http://liamgee.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rgs
Goldmember
Avatar
2,430 posts
Gallery: 176 photos
Likes: 1435
Joined Jun 2007
Location: Oklahoma City
     
Jun 14, 2015 20:02 |  #7134

DisrupTer911 wrote in post #17597002 (external link)
Looking for some C&C

7 shot merges in LRCC(6)

Are these the merges right from LR or did you work them over a bit post merge? Did you merge all 7 brackets? I evaluate each bracket and only use the ones needed. I also try to use adjacent brackets and don't skip any. Most of my shots actually use 4 or 5 - rarely more and sometimes as few a 3. In this case I think you are using too many light brackets because your lamps are too hot. This usually indicates that you have so much blown out data that it's bleeding into adjacent areas.

The bedroom has a color shift across the room because of mixed lighting between the tungsten lamps and daylight from the windows. This is a common problem and adjustment brushes can fix it. In this case just a grad across the screen (L to R) with a little added blue will probably clear up the problem. The shadow at the foot of the bed really needs some detail in it. It's quite muddy right now. I also think the bed at the left edge could be lightened slightly. And I would crop some of the ceiling as well.

The bathroom has very slight pink cast. Was that the real color of that room? Mostly I would want to tone down the bright spots in the room - the floor and the box under the sink stand out to me. Did the room force a vertical shot? Vertical shots can be problematic in RE (monitors are all horizontal and most RE images are viewed online) but sometimes small rooms force vertical images. I would crop a good deal of the ceiling - there is nothing there that a buyer wants to see. In fact, I think I might crop to the top and bottom of the shower door which would make a nearly square image. Try it and see if you don't like that crop.

These are good shots. I'm being very critical because overall they have a good deal of potential. In my experience, all blends (EF or HDR) require editing after blending. The good thing about the new LR 6 HDR is that images can be modified so much after the initial merge. Getting a bright but not overblown image is a tricky balance. Hope this helps.


Canon 7d MkII, Canon 50D, Pentax 67, Canon 30D, Baker Custom 4x5, Canon EF 24-104mm f4, Canon EF 100mm f2.8 Macro, Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5, 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Di VC

The Singular Image (external link)Richard Smith Photography (external link)
Richard Smith Real Estate Photography (external link)500PX (external link)
Fine Art America (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DisrupTer911
Goldmember
Avatar
2,455 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 29
Joined Jul 2008
Location: TN, USA
     
Jun 14, 2015 20:27 |  #7135

hi RGS & Luxury,

Thank you for the constructive help.

I did a horizontal of the bathroom as well but felt it looked better in vertical.

And here I thought the towels would tie everything together so I went and folded everything neatly and arranged the items to be pleasing to the eye.

I'll go back and edit out the color casts, I thought the bedroom had a change but I tried to fix it w/o a gradient.

These are 7 shots, merged in LRCC then edited as a whole as I read that editing before and then merging is just a wash and reverts to original.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2015/06/2/LQ_732744.jpg
Image hosted by forum (732744) © DisrupTer911 [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

www.vividemotionphotograph​y.comexternal link

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rgs
Goldmember
Avatar
2,430 posts
Gallery: 176 photos
Likes: 1435
Joined Jun 2007
Location: Oklahoma City
     
Jun 14, 2015 20:43 as a reply to  @ DisrupTer911's post |  #7136

Your horizontal is a big improvement and the hot bright spots are under control. The wall sconces are greatly improved. I would simply open the shadows - slightly - and you have a very good image. The towels don't bother me. They look very neat. Some don't like things like that and others do. I don't think you'll find a consensus so you consult with your client and use your best judgement.

Regarding the bedroom - give it a shot with just the middle 4 or 5 shots from your bracket and see what you get. You may be surprised at how much better the highlights - in particular - are.


Canon 7d MkII, Canon 50D, Pentax 67, Canon 30D, Baker Custom 4x5, Canon EF 24-104mm f4, Canon EF 100mm f2.8 Macro, Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5, 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Di VC

The Singular Image (external link)Richard Smith Photography (external link)
Richard Smith Real Estate Photography (external link)500PX (external link)
Fine Art America (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DisrupTer911
Goldmember
Avatar
2,455 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 29
Joined Jul 2008
Location: TN, USA
     
Jun 14, 2015 20:54 |  #7137

The wall to the right and the door and handle don't bother you?

That's why I went vertical. to eliminate that.

Perhaps though, from a non-photographic-critque the door/handle is normal to us and the regular joe investor won't care because they know rooms have doors and handles?


www.vividemotionphotograph​y.comexternal link

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rgs
Goldmember
Avatar
2,430 posts
Gallery: 176 photos
Likes: 1435
Joined Jun 2007
Location: Oklahoma City
     
Jun 14, 2015 20:58 |  #7138

DisrupTer911 wrote in post #17597157 (external link)
The wall to the right and the door and handle don't bother you?

That's why I went vertical. to eliminate that.

Perhaps though, from a non-photographic-critque the door/handle is normal to us and the regular joe investor won't care because they know rooms have doors and handles?

Not the door handle. The black band can be cropped and, if you want to maintain a horizontal (rather than a vaguely square) shape, you can still crop the ceiling to the top of the shower door.


Canon 7d MkII, Canon 50D, Pentax 67, Canon 30D, Baker Custom 4x5, Canon EF 24-104mm f4, Canon EF 100mm f2.8 Macro, Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5, 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Di VC

The Singular Image (external link)Richard Smith Photography (external link)
Richard Smith Real Estate Photography (external link)500PX (external link)
Fine Art America (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DisrupTer911
Goldmember
Avatar
2,455 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 29
Joined Jul 2008
Location: TN, USA
     
Jun 14, 2015 21:06 |  #7139

How do these look now?

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2015/06/2/LQ_732751.jpg
Image hosted by forum (732751) © DisrupTer911 [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2015/06/2/LQ_732752.jpg
Image hosted by forum (732752) © DisrupTer911 [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

www.vividemotionphotograph​y.comexternal link

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Luxury
Senior Member
Avatar
635 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 5
Joined Sep 2009
Location: Vancouver, BC
     
Jun 14, 2015 21:23 as a reply to  @ DisrupTer911's post |  #7140

I would bring the brightness of the first image down a stop, it seems a little washed out. The colour is a big improvement though.

Similarly with the bathroom shot. You're losing some of the richness of those wall panels, but overall the colour looks a lot better.

I think the crops on both work better now than the first images.


Liam - A7r, Fuji x100, 450d and some other stuff. --- Flickr  (external link)--- http://liamgee.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,177,759 views & 1,938 likes for this thread, 596 members have posted to it and it is followed by 176 members.
A thread for real estate, architectural, and interior design photography
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Architecture, Real-Estate & Buildings 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ANebinger
943 guests, 146 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.