Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Architecture, Real-Estate & Buildings 
Thread started 15 Jul 2010 (Thursday) 14:37
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

A thread for real estate, architectural, and interior design photography

 
fnothaft
Senior Member
575 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Feb 2010
Location: Oakland, CA
     
Feb 18, 2011 09:55 |  #1336

TGrundvig wrote in post #11867041 (external link)
What are the rest of you guys using to correct barrel distortion?

It is usually very mild with my lens, but when I do have some obvious distortion I use Lens Correction. Just curious who using DPP, or LR, or PS, and what your process looks like.

LR3 all the way. Allows me to correct for rotation and vertical tilt at the same time, and the grid is real nice.


Body: Canon EOS 5D Mark 2 • Lenses: Bower 14mm f/2.8 ED AS IF UMC, Canon TS-E 24mm f/3.5L II, Canon EF 28mm f/1.8 USM, Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II, Lensbaby 2.0, Canon EF 85mm f/1.8 USM, Canon EF 135 f/2L USM • Lighting: Canon Speedlite 580EX II • Support: Dolica CX620B104
Gear listWebsite (external link)Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Andrew.Zerick
Senior Member
Avatar
557 posts
Joined Sep 2010
Location: Santa Rosa Beach, FL
     
Feb 18, 2011 10:38 |  #1337

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR

Hawkins Hall! (external link) by andrew.zerick (external link), on Flickr

My Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
default
Mostly Lurking
19 posts
Joined Nov 2009
Location: Sweden
     
Feb 20, 2011 15:15 |  #1338

It's been a while since I posted anything here but I did some practicing at my mother in law's place yesterday. The scene is lit by three speedlights; one in the kitchen to the right, one is bounced on the wall below a window to the left and one is in an umbrella behind the corner to the right. To the left (out of view) there is a bookshelf covering the entire wall except for a window.
Would really like some comments and perhaps suggestions on how to do it differently (better?)


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
djharmonix
Goldmember
Avatar
1,167 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Feb 2007
     
Feb 21, 2011 10:15 |  #1339

nice shot.


Please, click ''LIKE'' on my facebook page for real estate photography! Thank you for your support!http://www.facebook.co​m/photoresidence (external link)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
default
Mostly Lurking
19 posts
Joined Nov 2009
Location: Sweden
     
Feb 23, 2011 02:18 |  #1340

Thanks, I was struggling with dark corners and such during the shoot but with some pp it turned out ok.
I still think there is a bit too much shadow from curtains etc, though. Wasn't really able to get rid of that.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mikekelley
THREAD ­ STARTER
"Meow! Bark! Honk! Hiss! Grrr! Tweet!"
Avatar
7,317 posts
Likes: 16
Joined Feb 2009
Location: Los Angeles, CA
     
Feb 23, 2011 10:59 |  #1341

The lighting is pretty good, but the comp isn't the greatest. it shows a lot without showing anything at all, if you ask me. a piece of this, a piece of that, some of this, a little of that - but i don't get a full sense of anything.


Los Angeles-Based Architectural, Interior, And Luxury Real Estate Photography (external link)
How To Photograph Real Estate and Architecture (external link)
My Fine Art Galleries (external link)
My articles at Fstoppers.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
djharmonix
Goldmember
Avatar
1,167 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Feb 2007
     
Feb 24, 2011 22:53 |  #1342

I think I nailed the light balance and WB on this one, single exposure. No D/B, filters etc..

IMAGE: http://www.pbase.com/nicolasshapiro/image/132770987/original.jpg

Please, click ''LIKE'' on my facebook page for real estate photography! Thank you for your support!http://www.facebook.co​m/photoresidence (external link)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
keyframe14
Goldmember
Avatar
1,369 posts
Likes: 86
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Orlando, FL
     
Feb 24, 2011 23:21 |  #1343

djharmonix wrote in post #11909739 (external link)
I think I nailed the light balance and WB on this one, single exposure. No D/B, filters etc..

You nailed the light, not the distortion, everything in the right is falling .


Facebook (external link)
www.albert-heisler.com  (external link)
500px (external link)
IG (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
djharmonix
Goldmember
Avatar
1,167 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Feb 2007
     
Feb 24, 2011 23:28 |  #1344

keyframe14 wrote in post #11909892 (external link)
You nailed the light, not the distortion, everything in the right is falling .

you're right but it's either that or the counter top would take even more space in the corner..
that's the biggest ''flaw'' of the 17 when shifted.


Please, click ''LIKE'' on my facebook page for real estate photography! Thank you for your support!http://www.facebook.co​m/photoresidence (external link)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
midtx350z
Member
Avatar
49 posts
Joined Mar 2010
Location: Dallas, Texas, USA
     
Feb 24, 2011 23:28 |  #1345

So what is the most recommended lens for RE photography?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
djharmonix
Goldmember
Avatar
1,167 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Feb 2007
     
Feb 24, 2011 23:30 |  #1346

midtx350z wrote in post #11909929 (external link)
So what is the most recommended lens for RE photography?

17ts-e, and 24ts-e.

for high end I would probably use the 24 most of the time. For general public the 17 is better.


Please, click ''LIKE'' on my facebook page for real estate photography! Thank you for your support!http://www.facebook.co​m/photoresidence (external link)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
midtx350z
Member
Avatar
49 posts
Joined Mar 2010
Location: Dallas, Texas, USA
     
Feb 24, 2011 23:34 |  #1347

keleko17 wrote in post #11862305 (external link)
When I see some of these images, I question what little I know about photography.

If this is straight out of camera, with the lens kit, I would think you need a shutter speed that would have blurred everyone walking around. If not a long exposure, it surely would need an ISO that would have shown some noise.

Do you mind me asking your settings?

http://www.flickr.com …stpacket/524321​2584/meta/ (external link)

Exposure 0.025 sec (1/40)
Aperture f/3.5
Focal Length 18 mm
ISO Speed 1600
Exposure Bias 0 EV
Flash Off, Did not fire

Not grainy at all. Good job!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
midtx350z
Member
Avatar
49 posts
Joined Mar 2010
Location: Dallas, Texas, USA
     
Feb 24, 2011 23:37 |  #1348

djharmonix wrote in post #11909943 (external link)
17ts-e, and 24ts-e.

for high end I would probably use the 24 most of the time. For general public the 17 is better.

What about non tilt shift lenses?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mikekelley
THREAD ­ STARTER
"Meow! Bark! Honk! Hiss! Grrr! Tweet!"
Avatar
7,317 posts
Likes: 16
Joined Feb 2009
Location: Los Angeles, CA
     
Feb 25, 2011 00:32 |  #1349

17-40, 16-35, 24L. they will get you by but if you're serious about this pick up a 17 or 24ts. it has saved me so much time with regards to post processing. i keep my 17-40 for backup but after using the TS lenses, it seems comical. i staunchly defended the 17-40 before i owned the 17ts...i use the 17-40 basically never.

and DJh, that looks fine to me...i dont really see any distracting distotion...its a tight space


Los Angeles-Based Architectural, Interior, And Luxury Real Estate Photography (external link)
How To Photograph Real Estate and Architecture (external link)
My Fine Art Galleries (external link)
My articles at Fstoppers.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
default
Mostly Lurking
19 posts
Joined Nov 2009
Location: Sweden
     
Feb 25, 2011 07:30 as a reply to  @ mikekelley's post |  #1350

Thanks for your feedback, Mike.
What would have been the best way to improve it? Should I just have moved more stuff out of the picture or should I have shot it wider? Or perhaps tighter? Different angle?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,186,792 views & 1,938 likes for this thread, 596 members have posted to it and it is followed by 176 members.
A thread for real estate, architectural, and interior design photography
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Architecture, Real-Estate & Buildings 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is IoDaLi Photography
1829 guests, 116 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.