When I convert from RAW I usually save in a .tiff format. If I do all my post processing work..flatten the image and then save as a jpeg am I losing alot of what I did or is it suffceint for printing
Mullet Member 85 posts Joined May 2005 More info | Aug 06, 2005 22:37 | #1 When I convert from RAW I usually save in a .tiff format. If I do all my post processing work..flatten the image and then save as a jpeg am I losing alot of what I did or is it suffceint for printing
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tim Light Bringer 51,010 posts Likes: 375 Joined Nov 2004 Location: Wellington, New Zealand More info | Aug 07, 2005 00:36 | #2 JPG Q12 is good enough for printing, I print 20*30 pics from JPG. I only save as TIFF when i've made significant changes to the picture, otherwise I leave it as RAW and convert to JPG just for printing. Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ohenry Senior Member 397 posts Joined Nov 2003 Location: Oregon More info | Aug 07, 2005 06:30 | #3 I save all of my images in PSD format as MASTER copies which includes all work except resizing and sharpening (I keep all layers for this file). When I am ready to print a copy, I will flatten, resize, and sharpen. I don't bother converting to JPG for print. Only time I convert a photo to a jpg image is when I'm going to post it on the web or send via email. When I convert to jpg, I will convert the color space to sRGB, reduce to 8 bit, resize to convenient size in 72 ppi, flatten, and sharpen.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Hellashot Goldmember 4,617 posts Likes: 2 Joined Sep 2004 Location: USA More info | Aug 07, 2005 10:26 | #4 Permanent banMullet wrote: When I convert from RAW I usually save in a .tiff format. If I do all my post processing work..flatten the image and then save as a jpeg am I losing alot of what I did or is it suffceint for printing Yes you are. Keep it in TIFF unless it's just for web viewing or something that will never get printed. 5D, Drebel, EOS-3, K1000
LOG IN TO REPLY |
That was my concern. I was hoping the difference was slight, because it would make it a whole lot easier for uploading to Mpix.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
robertwgross Cream of the Crop 9,462 posts Likes: 3 Joined Nov 2002 Location: California More info | I shoot RAW, then convert to TIF with tweaks along the way. Virtually everything that has come to my computer for editing is in TIF format. Then, if anything is getting published to the web site or sent anywhere, it is converted to JPEG then and only then.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Desertraptor Cream of the Crop More info | Aug 07, 2005 21:39 | #7 I like the idea of PSD file as it includes all layers which makes it easy to redo something. Where as flattening the image means any changes you have to start over? Peter
LOG IN TO REPLY |
robertwgross Cream of the Crop 9,462 posts Likes: 3 Joined Nov 2002 Location: California More info | I think PSD is a fine format for keeping everything together while you are doing heavy editing, and especially for compositing a collage.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
PhotosGuy Cream of the Crop, R.I.P. More info | Aug 10, 2005 09:34 | #9 I like the idea of PSD file as it includes all layers which makes it easy to redo something. So will tiffs if you set that parameter when saving. PSD files can get huge. So can tiffs with layers, though adjustment layers are very small. FrankC - 20D, RAW, Manual everything...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Mihai Bucur 1177 guests, 169 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||