Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff The Lounge 
Thread started 18 Jul 2010 (Sunday) 05:20
Search threadPrev/next
POLL: "Which image do you prefer?"
Image 1
8
80%
Image 2
2
20%

10 voters, 10 votes given (any choice choices can be voted per member)). VOTING IS FOR MEMBERS ONLY.
BROWSE ALL POLLS
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Which is better?

 
Tareq
"I am very lazy, a normal consumer"
Avatar
17,984 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 551
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Ajman - UAE
     
Jul 18, 2010 05:20 |  #1

Those 2 shots, which one do you prefer? and why if so.

Image 1

IMAGE: http://img571.imageshack.us/img571/4464/img01k.jpg

Image 2
IMAGE: http://img35.imageshack.us/img35/5346/img02qb.jpg

Galleries:
http://hamrani.deviant​art.com/gallery/ (external link)
Gear List
Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tareq
THREAD ­ STARTER
"I am very lazy, a normal consumer"
Avatar
17,984 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 551
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Ajman - UAE
     
Jul 18, 2010 05:21 |  #2

Ignore the dust


Galleries:
http://hamrani.deviant​art.com/gallery/ (external link)
Gear List
Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RetroBlader
Senior Member
Avatar
863 posts
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
     
Jul 18, 2010 10:00 |  #3



Neither, to be honest. It's too "dreamy" if you are trying to be accurate (product info or documenting a pipe problem). If you are trying to be artistic, I would not have shot the pipe head-on, nor put it square in the middle.

Anyway, if I must choose one, Image 2 looks slightly better to me -- the pipe jumps out more (assuming that was your intent by blurring the background so much). The neon-green colour was probably not accurate, but helped it look less mudane.

(If the intent is to be artistic, I would go nuts on the saturation and maybe even try solarizing the photo. Or try as a black-and-white with different settings on the colour mixer.)

Hope my honest opinion did not offend.


:)


Above water: 7D | 400D | 10-22 | 17-55IS | 15-85IS | 85/1.8 | 100L IS | 70-200/4L IS | 70-300IS | 100-400L | 580EX II
Underwater: S95 + WP-DC38 + dual dive lights | Olympus OM-D E-M5 (await housing)
Full Gear List
Need/Want: More time for photography (And some talent would be nice.... :lol:)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tareq
THREAD ­ STARTER
"I am very lazy, a normal consumer"
Avatar
17,984 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 551
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Ajman - UAE
     
Jul 18, 2010 10:28 |  #4

RetroBlader wrote in post #10557815 (external link)
Neither, to be honest. It's too "dreamy" if you are trying to be accurate (product info or documenting a pipe problem). If you are trying to be artistic, I would not have shot the pipe head-on, nor put it square in the middle.

Anyway, if I must choose one, Image 2 looks slightly better to me -- the pipe jumps out more (assuming that was your intent by blurring the background so much). The neon-green colour was probably not accurate, but helped it look less mudane.

(If the intent is to be artistic, I would go nuts on the saturation and maybe even try solarizing the photo. Or try as a black-and-white with different settings on the colour mixer.)

Hope my honest opinion did not offend.


:)

In fact i wasn't so clear about it here, i was just meaning about which color or better quality of both in color or details, not asking about which one is good as a pic or quality as art or work, this shot is just sh..t and it is just a test, nothing to do about art or masterpiece or whatever, only a test shot and i want to see the difference between the two for a conclusion reason later.


Galleries:
http://hamrani.deviant​art.com/gallery/ (external link)
Gear List
Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
windpig
Chopped liver
Avatar
15,914 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 2255
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Just South of Ballard
     
Jul 18, 2010 11:06 |  #5

Which ever replicates the color of the scene when shot.


Would you like to buy a vowel?
Go ahead, spin the wheel.
flickr (external link)
I'm accross the canal just south of Ballard, the town Seattle usurped in 1907.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Belmondo
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
42,735 posts
Likes: 15
Joined Jul 2003
Location: 92210
     
Jul 18, 2010 11:12 as a reply to  @ windpig's post |  #6

Tareq:

Image 1 is better, at least to my eye.

Richer colors, and better detail, especially on the re-bar reinforcing the pipe.


I'm not short. I'm concentrated awesome!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
condyk
Africa's #1 Tour Guide
Avatar
20,887 posts
Likes: 22
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Birmingham, UK
     
Jul 18, 2010 11:18 |  #7

There's not enough difference for me to prefer either and it's a really unattractive composition. I don't really see the point of it. Is it some kind of test?


https://photography-on-the.net …/showthread.php​?t=1203740

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tareq
THREAD ­ STARTER
"I am very lazy, a normal consumer"
Avatar
17,984 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 551
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Ajman - UAE
     
Jul 18, 2010 11:20 |  #8

windpig wrote in post #10558081 (external link)
Which ever replicates the color of the scene when shot.


And that means?


Galleries:
http://hamrani.deviant​art.com/gallery/ (external link)
Gear List
Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tareq
THREAD ­ STARTER
"I am very lazy, a normal consumer"
Avatar
17,984 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 551
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Ajman - UAE
     
Jul 18, 2010 11:21 |  #9

Belmondo wrote in post #10558105 (external link)
Tareq:

Image 1 is better, at least to my eye.

Richer colors, and better detail, especially on the re-bar reinforcing the pipe.

I prefer the colors of #2 a bit, but the details to my eyes is going for #1.


Galleries:
http://hamrani.deviant​art.com/gallery/ (external link)
Gear List
Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tareq
THREAD ­ STARTER
"I am very lazy, a normal consumer"
Avatar
17,984 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 551
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Ajman - UAE
     
Jul 18, 2010 11:22 |  #10

condyk wrote in post #10558139 (external link)
There's not enough difference for me to prefer either and it's a really unattractive composition. I don't really see the point of it. Is it some kind of test?

Yes, it is a kind of test, later i will tell what kind of test.


Galleries:
http://hamrani.deviant​art.com/gallery/ (external link)
Gear List
Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
windpig
Chopped liver
Avatar
15,914 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 2255
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Just South of Ballard
     
Jul 18, 2010 11:26 |  #11

Tareq wrote in post #10558154 (external link)
And that means?

Which shot comes closest to the true colors of the subject as you looked at them with your own eyes at the time the photo was taken. Otherwise I'm not sure what we are trying to opine about.


Would you like to buy a vowel?
Go ahead, spin the wheel.
flickr (external link)
I'm accross the canal just south of Ballard, the town Seattle usurped in 1907.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tareq
THREAD ­ STARTER
"I am very lazy, a normal consumer"
Avatar
17,984 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 551
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Ajman - UAE
     
Jul 18, 2010 11:36 |  #12

windpig wrote in post #10558185 (external link)
Which shot comes closest to the true colors of the subject as you looked at them with your own eyes at the time the photo was taken. Otherwise I'm not sure what we are trying to opine about.

Almost both came out so close to the true colors of the subject, in fact the both shots are one shot the same exact.


Galleries:
http://hamrani.deviant​art.com/gallery/ (external link)
Gear List
Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
windpig
Chopped liver
Avatar
15,914 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 2255
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Just South of Ballard
     
Jul 18, 2010 11:44 |  #13

Tareq wrote in post #10558240 (external link)
Almost both came out so close to the true colors of the subject, in fact the both shots are one shot the same exact.

From the outset I assumed they were the same shot, only PP'd differently.


Would you like to buy a vowel?
Go ahead, spin the wheel.
flickr (external link)
I'm accross the canal just south of Ballard, the town Seattle usurped in 1907.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RetroBlader
Senior Member
Avatar
863 posts
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
     
Jul 18, 2010 11:49 |  #14

Tareq wrote in post #10558240 (external link)
Almost both came out so close to the true colors of the subject, in fact the both shots are one shot the same exact.


On my screen, they are not close at all! The colours are very different.

So, one picture must be closer to what your eyes see than the other -- unless you are looking with one eye at a time (most of us have slightly different colour perception in our eyes).

:cool:


Above water: 7D | 400D | 10-22 | 17-55IS | 15-85IS | 85/1.8 | 100L IS | 70-200/4L IS | 70-300IS | 100-400L | 580EX II
Underwater: S95 + WP-DC38 + dual dive lights | Olympus OM-D E-M5 (await housing)
Full Gear List
Need/Want: More time for photography (And some talent would be nice.... :lol:)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RetroBlader
Senior Member
Avatar
863 posts
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
     
Jul 18, 2010 11:53 |  #15

Belmondo wrote in post #10558105 (external link)
better detail, especially on the re-bar reinforcing the pipe.


I agree that Picture 1 has more detail.

However, when I commented I assumed reproduction of detail was not Tareq's main intent, since most of the pipe (nor the re-bar) was not in focus/inside the DOF.


:cool:


Above water: 7D | 400D | 10-22 | 17-55IS | 15-85IS | 85/1.8 | 100L IS | 70-200/4L IS | 70-300IS | 100-400L | 580EX II
Underwater: S95 + WP-DC38 + dual dive lights | Olympus OM-D E-M5 (await housing)
Full Gear List
Need/Want: More time for photography (And some talent would be nice.... :lol:)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,771 views & 0 likes for this thread, 9 members have posted to it.
Which is better?
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff The Lounge 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is griggt
957 guests, 116 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.