Anybody see this:
http://www.electronista.com …tackle.micro.four.thirds/![]()
Coments
Lou
lowrider Goldmember 1,048 posts Likes: 291 Joined Aug 2008 Location: Tucson More info | Jul 20, 2010 17:41 | #1 Anybody see this:
LOG IN TO REPLY |
watt100 Cream of the Crop 14,021 posts Likes: 34 Joined Jun 2008 More info | Jul 20, 2010 18:56 | #2 lowrider wrote in post #10573192 Anybody see this: http://www.electronista.com …tackle.micro.four.thirds/ Coments Lou obviously Canon's marketing research doesn't extend to this forum!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
10megapixel "I'm a little slow" 3,872 posts Likes: 5 Joined Oct 2008 Location: Surrounded by Corn and Rednecks in Indiana More info | Jul 20, 2010 19:11 | #3 watt100 wrote in post #10573613 obviously Canon's marketing research doesn't extend to this forum!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
PhotoOps Mostly Lurking 10 posts Joined Jun 2009 More info | Jul 20, 2010 19:40 | #4 I can't wait. Looking forward to see what Canon will reveal. =)
LOG IN TO REPLY |
NeutronBoy Goldmember 2,052 posts Likes: 2 Joined Jul 2007 Location: LI, NY More info | Jul 20, 2010 20:01 | #5 great ... new lenses ... something more to buy Sony A7C, Sony A6000, 5D Mark II, 40D, 350d
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gjl711 Wait.. you can't unkill your own kill. 57,733 posts Likes: 4065 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Deep in the heart of Texas More info | Jul 20, 2010 20:20 | #6 There are plenty of times a smaller body would be appreciated but Just shrinking the body a little without also shrinking the lenses doesn't buy that much. The Panasonic or Olly coupled with the smaller 4/3 lens makes for a nice package. Not sure why, but call me JJ.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
KenjiS "Holy crap its long!" More info | Jul 20, 2010 20:21 | #7 This is good news to me! Gear, New and Old! RAW Club Member
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ecub Goldmember 1,487 posts Joined May 2010 Location: Southwest suburbs of Chicago More info | Jul 20, 2010 20:45 | #8 Wonder if there will be a battery grip. - Ed
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jacobsen1 Cream of the Crop 9,629 posts Likes: 32 Joined Jan 2006 Location: Mt View, RI More info | Jul 20, 2010 21:15 | #9 I owned and loved a GF1 for a while. In the end I didn't like their image processing and the RAWs were just different. But if canon made it I'd buy it again in a second. The suggestion of canon making a smaller DSLR instead of an EVIL is interesting... I'd love to see them go EVIL but EVIL means new lenses (and the possibility of your EF/EF-S lenses also working via adapter). Going with the smallest DSLR possible means we keep our lenses, but they'd be bigger than the EVIL counterparts... My Gear List
LOG IN TO REPLY |
CameraNerd Senior Member 935 posts Joined Nov 2009 More info | Jul 20, 2010 21:38 | #10 so can we use our canon ef and ef-s lenses on it. IF not then hells no, im not spending more money for another system, you might as well buy a non canon system. canon 7d, canon 5d classic, 24-70 2.8 L, 70-200 2.8 (non-is) L, .
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Gregg.Siam Goldmember 2,383 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jun 2010 Location: Bangkok More info | I always thought the micro 4/3 cameras were a joke. They claim they are smaller and easier to carry, but they all still have a huge lens. So putting it in your pocket it out. That means you will carry it just like a DSLR, but a small DSLR will beat it in every aspect. 5D MKIII | 24-105mm f/4 L| 50mm f/1.8 | 600EX-RT [FONT=Tahoma][COLOR=blue][FONT="]|
LOG IN TO REPLY |
CameraNerd Senior Member 935 posts Joined Nov 2009 More info | Jul 20, 2010 21:58 | #12 the rebels seem pretty small already, put a a canon 18-135 or much smaller kit lens 18-55 or 50 1.8 and thats your mini dslr right there. canon 7d, canon 5d classic, 24-70 2.8 L, 70-200 2.8 (non-is) L, .
LOG IN TO REPLY |
spacetime Goldmember 1,276 posts Joined Oct 2009 More info | Jul 20, 2010 22:41 | #13 lostpacket wrote in post #10574412 I always thought the micro 4/3 cameras were a joke. They claim they are smaller and easier to carry, but they all still have a huge lens. So putting it in your pocket it out. That means you will carry it just like a DSLR, but a small DSLR will beat it in every aspect. I agree, sure the size is charming but if it's not pocketable then I'd rather carry a P+S liek the s90.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
picturecrazy soft-hearted weenie-boy 8,565 posts Likes: 780 Joined Jan 2006 Location: Alberta, CANADA More info | Jul 20, 2010 22:43 | #14 I love my GF-1. I just don't like the lens selection for it. Need more pancake style lenses! -Lloyd
LOG IN TO REPLY |
PhotonPhil Goldmember 1,763 posts Likes: 2 Joined Jan 2006 Location: Capturing Photons in Wisconsin More info | Jul 20, 2010 22:45 | #15 Anything that takes the wanna be wedding star mom buyer away from the L lenses and lets the price drop is a good thing. Bodies: SONY A850 / Pentax K100D / D70 (18-55VR, 55-200)
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is semonsters 1471 guests, 131 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||