Canon 55-250 IS or 75-300 USM

dsvilko wrote in post #10594981
I no longer have the 75-300mm but I would say that the 55-250 is both smaller and lighter. I can carry my 1000d, 18-55mm, 55-250mm and 50mm 1.8 in a camera bag that couldn't fit the 70-200mm f/4 alone It's an excellent prepared-for-anything travel kit.

wow that's a nice gear , you have three lenses that you can use in all conditions ....
i think i'm prefer to take 55-250 with IS ....

DreDaze wrote in post #10595081
55-250mm...the USM on the 75-300mm is not a true ring USM...so it's really debatable if it's even that much faster to begin with...the IS could actually help more...

you're forgetting the 5...

nice info pal , once again 55-250 IS is get voted

turkleten wrote in post #10595500
Lol. I typed my suggestion in that thread already so here's the link:
https://photography-on-the.net …p?p=10586987&po​stcount=24

Let me know if you have any more questions.

lol i'm sorry i didn't read the link untill finish , yup seems 55-250 IS is more selected isn't it ?

xarqi wrote in post #10596497
Which is bigger: 250 or 300?

but 55-250 IS has a good range that is 55-250 and off course it can decrease a shaking when taking some photo ....

antique wrote in post #10597888
but 55-250 IS has a good range that is 55-250 and off course it can decrease a shaking when taking some photo ....

There's no doubt the 55-250 is the better lens, but your question was, which was longer.

xarqi wrote in post #10598248
There's no doubt the 55-250 is the better lens, but your question was, which was longer.

i wonder if he/she meant, "which lens is physically bigger/longer?"

xarqi wrote in post #10598248
There's no doubt the 55-250 is the better lens, but your question was, which was longer.

yup thanks for advice , i think i'm prefer to buy 55-250 IS

klr.b wrote in post #10598401
i wonder if he/she meant, "which lens is physically bigger/longer?"

sorry if the question makes you confused , i mean which lens is longer views from the body ....