Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 25 Jul 2010 (Sunday) 14:51
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Usable ISO 3200

 
snowshark13
Senior Member
705 posts
Likes: 25
Joined Jan 2009
Location: Minneapolis, MN
     
Jul 25, 2010 14:51 |  #1

I will admit, I am really a newbie in shooting higher ISO's. I generally keep it no higher than 800...but have found a couple of times where I should've gone higher recently. So I recently took a test shot at ISO 3200 with my T2i and 135L. Without any post processing besides a little cropping below is what I got. My question is, is this what I should expect? Is this good high ISO IQ? I personally really think it is good and it printed 4x6 really nicely (which is probably all that matters). But, I would like to hear from others on it.

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO

Gear
www.digitalsnowshark.c​om (external link)
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
zerovision
Goldmember
Avatar
1,204 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Aug 2008
Location: Dallas/Ft Worth area
     
Jul 25, 2010 14:59 |  #2

Based on the image and you mentioned that you cropped it I would say that is about what you can expect. I don't know how much you cropped your image.

Does your histogram go all the way to the right? This looks a little under exposed and the dolls eyes looks soft. Looks like focus is on the chair. ISO 3200 will not be perfect, but it will show up more if your image is under exposed. A brighter subject and smaller image size will show less noise, but when you use high ISO and crop the image your making the noise stand out even more.


  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
snowshark13
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
705 posts
Likes: 25
Joined Jan 2009
Location: Minneapolis, MN
     
Jul 25, 2010 15:16 |  #3

As far as exposure, I've noticed my camera under exposes with both of my lenses quite a bit. I've bumped it a 1/3, but should probably bump it another 1/3. Here is the SOOC image, as you can see, I did bump up the exposure on the first image I posted.

IMAGE NOT FOUND
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE

Gear
www.digitalsnowshark.c​om (external link)
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
spacetime
Goldmember
Avatar
1,276 posts
Joined Oct 2009
     
Jul 25, 2010 15:23 |  #4

It looks acceptable thought the image appears backfocused so it appears a bit soft. And if you apply any sharpening it tends to increase noise so it might venture into the unacceptable category.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
zerovision
Goldmember
Avatar
1,204 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Aug 2008
Location: Dallas/Ft Worth area
     
Jul 25, 2010 15:38 |  #5

The overall noise looks better in the second image, but I would bump it up another 1/3 and see how that looks.


  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeamSpeed
01010100 01010011
Avatar
40,862 posts
Gallery: 116 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8923
Joined May 2002
Location: Midwest
     
Jul 25, 2010 15:41 |  #6

I always shoot at +1/3 at high ISOs, then bring levels down a bit if needed. Sometimes I need to go an extra 1/3 depending on the type of light (stage colors).


Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery (external link) My Business Gallery (external link)
"Man only has 5 senses, and sometimes not even that, so if they define the world, the universe, the dimensions of existence, and spirituality with just these limited senses, their view of what-is and what-can-be is very myopic indeed and they are doomed, now and forever."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
snowshark13
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
705 posts
Likes: 25
Joined Jan 2009
Location: Minneapolis, MN
     
Jul 29, 2010 19:50 |  #7

So I thought I would do another test...ISO 3200 and 6400. I have my camera setup to shoot in AV with a EC of +2/3. The only difference between these shots were ISO and then one was shot at 1/50 and the other at 1/100. Both shot at f2.0.

In LR I decreased exposure -1.3 on both images and that is the only PP I did on them.

ISO3200

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO


ISO6400
IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO

Gear
www.digitalsnowshark.c​om (external link)
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
zerovision
Goldmember
Avatar
1,204 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Aug 2008
Location: Dallas/Ft Worth area
     
Jul 30, 2010 13:09 |  #8

To me, the noise looks fine. Now just do a white balance. This will give a better reading on the noise and will brighten up the picture to see how the noise would look once the picture has been edited.


  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MMURAD
Senior Member
Avatar
627 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Nov 2009
Location: San Diego
     
Jul 30, 2010 13:29 |  #9

the noise seems ok....however that doll is spooky!


Name: Mike / 90D & 7D gripped / Sigma 35mm 1.4 / Sigma 18-35mm 1.8 / Sigma 150-600 Contemporary /Tamron 90 2.8 macro / Tamron 10-24mm / Tamron 28-75 2.8 / Tamron 70-300vc / Sigma 150-500os / Canon 580ex II
My Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Orogeny
Goldmember
Avatar
1,169 posts
Gallery: 90 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 1745
Joined Aug 2003
Location: Houston, Texas
     
Jul 30, 2010 13:41 as a reply to  @ MMURAD's post |  #10

I think it is awesome that we are even considering the IQ of those images taken at ISO 3200 and ISO 6400. It was only about 7 months ago that I upgraded from my 300D to my 7D and, let me tell you, I couldn't get photos that clean at ISO 800 with the 300D!

Tim


There's someone in my head, but it's not me! - Roger Waters

https://www.flickr.com​/photos/orogeny/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,085 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it.
Usable ISO 3200
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Thunderstream
1224 guests, 122 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.