Just wanting to check before ordering - is the Dell U2410 still considered the monitor of choice for photo editing (at that sort of price range)?
regards,
/alan
alan_potter wireless groping system  More info | Jul 26, 2010 03:00 | #1 Just wanting to check before ordering - is the Dell U2410 still considered the monitor of choice for photo editing (at that sort of price range)? Falkirk, Scotland.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RoyC Goldmember  2,088 posts Likes: 21 Joined Aug 2005 Location: N.Devon, UK More info | Jul 26, 2010 04:12 | #2 I would also like to know Alan as I am thinking about the 2410. TOP BIRD SHOTS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ChasP505 "brain damaged old guy"  5,566 posts Likes: 1 Joined Dec 2006 Location: New Mexico, USA More info | Jul 26, 2010 10:59 | #3 alan_potter wrote in post #10603638  ...is the Dell U2410 still considered the monitor of choice for photo editing (at that sort of price range)?
Chas P
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RoyC Goldmember 2,088 posts Likes: 21 Joined Aug 2005 Location: N.Devon, UK More info | Jul 27, 2010 01:07 | #4 ChasP505 wrote in post #10605243 If you're a Dell fanboy, yes. But the HP LP2475w is still popular. And on your side of the pond, there may be an offering from LG that I'm not aware of. I have never dealt with Dell or HP so not a 'Fanboy' of either but from everything I read from the UK, Dell UK have a very good customer services reputation whereas HP have not. This would seem to be the opposite of general opinion in the States. TOP BIRD SHOTS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ChasP505 "brain damaged old guy" 5,566 posts Likes: 1 Joined Dec 2006 Location: New Mexico, USA More info | Jul 27, 2010 17:13 | #5 Roy C wrote in post #10609387 I must admit I am very nervous about switching from my CRT but the 17" screen is very limiting.
Chas P
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RoyC Goldmember 2,088 posts Likes: 21 Joined Aug 2005 Location: N.Devon, UK More info | Jul 27, 2010 23:33 | #6 ChasP505 wrote in post #10613786 I'll bet! A 17" CRT has the effective viewing area of a 14" LCD. Hmm, if that's so then maybe I do not need anything as big as a 24" LCD. I think I may start looking at a 20" instead which I guess is going to give me a increase viewing area of around 50% which would suit me fine. TOP BIRD SHOTS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ChasP505 "brain damaged old guy" 5,566 posts Likes: 1 Joined Dec 2006 Location: New Mexico, USA More info | Jul 28, 2010 12:49 | #7 Roy C wrote in post #10615936 Hmm, if that's so then maybe I do not need anything as big as a 24" LCD. I think I may start looking at a 20" instead which I guess is going to give me a increase viewing area of around 50% which would suit me fine. Sounds like you should review what the major monitor manufacturers are now offering as 20" is kind of "old school". Perhaps 22-23"? Chas P
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 29, 2010 15:47 | #8 Thanks for the suggestions... what makes me nervous about the HP monitor is the lack of a "no dead pixel" guarantee Falkirk, Scotland.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Tony-S Cream of the Crop  9,911 posts Likes: 209 Joined Jan 2006 Location: Fort Collins, Colorado, USA More info | Jul 30, 2010 13:11 | #9 Roy C wrote in post #10615936 Hmm, if that's so then maybe I do not need anything as big as a 24" LCD. I think I may start looking at a 20" instead which I guess is going to give me a increase viewing area of around 50% which would suit me fine. I don't think there are many 20" 8-bit displays anymore. I think you'll be disappointed going from a CRT to a TN LCD. "Raw" is not an acronym, abbreviation, nor a proper noun; thus, it should not be in capital letters.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
soulevolved Member  223 posts Joined Nov 2007 Location: North by Northwest - Washington More info | Aug 10, 2010 17:17 | #10 Just unboxed it today after finally getting time to put together my desk and let me tell you. Nothing beats out 1920x1200 My Gear | my flickr®
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ZCphoto Senior Member  426 posts Joined Apr 2010 Location: Texas More info | Aug 10, 2010 23:13 | #11  Permanent bansoulevolved wrote in post #10696759 Just unboxed it today after finally getting time to put together my desk and let me tell you. Nothing beats out 1920x1200 Except dual U2711 monitors @ 2560x1440 in landscape and portrait. Robert
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is semonsters 1519 guests, 131 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
Kidding. I want dual U2410 monitors in my office.