Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 27 Jul 2010 (Tuesday) 10:01
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Best way to edit?

 
mknabster
Senior Member
Avatar
827 posts
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Limerick, PA, USA
     
Jul 27, 2010 10:01 |  #1

As i surf this forum and check out everyone's images, it seems like mine are somewhat flat in comparison. Now I do have some real nice ones, but it seems like the new thing now is to bump up the contrast and make everything look like it was PSed. I'm more of a purist in terms of doing everything in camera, and not taking it into PS to do anything, unless I'm going for a certain look. I shoot all RAW, so I have ultimate control, and use CR because I personally don't like Lightroom at all. I manually manage where everything is, which is why neither Lightroom nor Aperture are right for me. But in terms of everyone here, how do you edit your images, and what do you normally have to do? Are there any purists here as well?


- Matt

MK Studios (external link)
My Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ChasP505
"brain damaged old guy"
Avatar
5,566 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2006
Location: New Mexico, USA
     
Jul 27, 2010 10:13 |  #2

mknabster wrote in post #10611220 (external link)
...Are there any purists here as well?

I'm as as close to a purist as you can get, but I still edit my shots to reflect the mood or creative vision I had in mind when shooting. Maybe the better term is minimalist.

But if you're shooting raw and you do nothing to raw images, of course they'll look flat. I at least run raw images through the basic tab in ACR and later revisit the image for creative work in Photoshop.


Chas P
"It doesn't matter how you get there if you don't know where you're going!"https://photography-on-the.net …p?p=10864029#po​st10864029

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mknabster
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
827 posts
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Limerick, PA, USA
     
Jul 27, 2010 10:14 |  #3

What would you recommend doing to them, in general that is? When i shoot macro, everything pops, so i never worry about that, but in terms of landscapes and such?


- Matt

MK Studios (external link)
My Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ChasP505
"brain damaged old guy"
Avatar
5,566 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2006
Location: New Mexico, USA
     
Jul 27, 2010 10:27 |  #4

mknabster wrote in post #10611286 (external link)
What would you recommend doing to them, in general that is? When i shoot macro, everything pops, so i never worry about that, but in terms of landscapes and such?

For landscapes, if you aren't already using one, get a good quality circular polarizing filter and always shoot on a tripod or monopod. Shoot early morning or just before sunset. Maybe experiment with HDR techniques or B&W conversions. A flat color landscape shot can often be turned into a dramatic B&W.


Chas P
"It doesn't matter how you get there if you don't know where you're going!"https://photography-on-the.net …p?p=10864029#po​st10864029

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
usukshooter
Senior Member
Avatar
337 posts
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Manchester, UK
     
Jul 27, 2010 10:27 |  #5

If you're shooting in RAW, you should definitely be added some contrast. That doesn't mean boosting it so high it looks "photoshopped", it can still look natural... but RAW files are much too flat to leave them be completely. They also need some sharpening. At times, I'm very "purist" and don't like heavy photoshopping but I still add basic contrast and sharpening to all my images.


Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mknabster
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
827 posts
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Limerick, PA, USA
     
Jul 27, 2010 10:33 |  #6

Hmm, I never thought about sharpening, I guess that's why that option is there. I never fully grasped what that slider was for. Are there certain types of pictures sharpening should be applied to, or is that for basically everything? And also, if you are familiar with Camera RAW in PS, which is better to up, the contrast, or the blacks?


- Matt

MK Studios (external link)
My Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ChasP505
"brain damaged old guy"
Avatar
5,566 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2006
Location: New Mexico, USA
     
Jul 27, 2010 11:06 |  #7

mknabster wrote in post #10611397 (external link)
... if you are familiar with Camera RAW in PS, which is better to up, the contrast, or the blacks?

You want to set your black point first, because the black point effects shadow detail and color strength. You want to make sure you're not clipping dark areas, but retaining deep color at the same time. Contrast can help a photo "pop" but can lose midtones and shadow detail if you over do it.


Chas P
"It doesn't matter how you get there if you don't know where you're going!"https://photography-on-the.net …p?p=10864029#po​st10864029

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
usukshooter
Senior Member
Avatar
337 posts
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Manchester, UK
     
Jul 27, 2010 11:07 |  #8

I prefer to boost the contrast but I don't like putting it up too high so if I need something extra, I increase the blacks by 1 or 2 points.


Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bagman
Senior Member
Avatar
273 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Jun 2010
Location: Toronto
     
Jul 27, 2010 13:04 |  #9

Along those lines of Black Point. In Lightroom2, I have noticed my black-point is automatically set to a value of 5. I could have sworn long ago (and it may have changed from a LR2 update/patch), that the Blacks value was set to 2.

Any thoughts on how this happened, or - more importantly - how I change the default value LR2 uses. My best guess is that it possbily has to do with the Camera Calibration slider in the develop module. I think it is set to Standard Adobe RGB. Should I set it to Camera Standard?


EOS 70D | Canon 70-200mm F4L IS | Tamron 17-50mm F2.8 XR Di II | 430EX II | Lowepro Nova 170AW & Slingshot 202AW

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 570
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Jul 27, 2010 13:24 |  #10

I think the Black has always had a default of 5.


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mknabster
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
827 posts
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Limerick, PA, USA
     
Jul 27, 2010 19:12 |  #11

Thanks for your responses everyone. I'll play with the settings, and see what happens, i'm sure i'll get something that i'm happy with


- Matt

MK Studios (external link)
My Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RRocket
Member
Avatar
199 posts
Joined Jul 2009
Location: Tuscaloosa, AL
     
Jul 27, 2010 19:17 |  #12

RAW files most of the time need a little saturation and contrast boosts


Gripped Canon Rebel T2i, Canon 50mm F1.8
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
René ­ Damkot
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
39,856 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Feb 2005
Location: enschede, netherlands
     
Jul 28, 2010 06:13 |  #13

Bagman wrote in post #10612330 (external link)
Along those lines of Black Point. In Lightroom2, I have noticed my black-point is automatically set to a value of 5. I could have sworn long ago (and it may have changed from a LR2 update/patch), that the Blacks value was set to 2.

Any thoughts on how this happened, or - more importantly - how I change the default value LR2 uses. My best guess is that it possbily has to do with the Camera Calibration slider in the develop module. I think it is set to Standard Adobe RGB. Should I set it to Camera Standard?

LR "defaults" are specific to one camera, and can be set (in the prefs) to be ISO-specific.

If I import an image into LR2, shot at an ISO setting I'd not used before, it will come in with the "LR default": Everything 0, Blacks at 5, contrast 25, brightness 50.


"I think the idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas Adams
Why Color Management.
Color Problems? Click here.
MySpace (external link)
Get Colormanaged (external link)
Twitter (external link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bagman
Senior Member
Avatar
273 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Jun 2010
Location: Toronto
     
Jul 28, 2010 09:14 |  #14

René Damkot wrote in post #10617137 (external link)
LR "defaults" are specific to one camera, and can be set (in the prefs) to be ISO-specific.

If I import an image into LR2, shot at an ISO setting I'd not used before, it will come in with the "LR default": Everything 0, Blacks at 5, contrast 25, brightness 50.

ISO-specific is just what I think it is? LR2 reads the ISO from the photo's EXIF information and then applies those settings you described?

I can tell you that the values for the fields you mentioned are exactly what LR2 sets all my imported photos to.


EOS 70D | Canon 70-200mm F4L IS | Tamron 17-50mm F2.8 XR Di II | 430EX II | Lowepro Nova 170AW & Slingshot 202AW

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ChasP505
"brain damaged old guy"
Avatar
5,566 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2006
Location: New Mexico, USA
     
Jul 28, 2010 09:31 |  #15

mknabster wrote in post #10611397 (external link)
Hmm, I never thought about sharpening, I guess that's why that option is there. I never fully grasped what that slider was for. Are there certain types of pictures sharpening should be applied to, or is that for basically everything?...

That's an "It depends" type question. Sharpening on earlier versions of ACR was not that sophisticated and many users chose to do NO sharpening in ACR, then do their sharpening on the converted image later, in Photoshop. The sharpening now is greatly improved, but the camp is still divided between those who apply a base sharpening amount to every image, those who selectively sharpen according to the needs of the specific image, and those who still wait until they get into Photoshop before sharpening.

Every raw image needs some sharpening. When to sharpen, how much to sharpen, and what to sharpen is something you'll have to learn.


Chas P
"It doesn't matter how you get there if you don't know where you're going!"https://photography-on-the.net …p?p=10864029#po​st10864029

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,688 views & 0 likes for this thread, 7 members have posted to it.
Best way to edit?
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is SteveeY
1612 guests, 172 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.