Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Nature & Landscapes 
Thread started 27 Jul 2010 (Tuesday) 16:56
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Glasshouse Mountains

 
archer1960
Goldmember
Avatar
4,932 posts
Gallery: 6 photos
Likes: 82
Joined Jul 2010
     
Jul 30, 2010 11:22 |  #16

I guess I'm in the minority here; I really like the whole composition with the one tree standing alone. I might have lightened the whole thing up just a bit, but overall I like the gloomy feel.


Gripped 7D, gripped, full-spectrum modfied T1i (500D), SX50HS, A2E film body, Tamzooka (150-600), Tamron 90mm/2.8 VC (ver 2), Tamron 18-270 VC, Canon FD 100 f/4.0 macro, Canon 24-105 f/4L,Canon EF 200 f/2.8LII, Canon 85 f/1.8, Tamron Adaptall 2 90mmf/2.5 Macro, Tokina 11-16, Canon EX-430 flash, Vivitar DF-383 flash, Astro-Tech AT6RC and Celestron NexStar 102 GT telescopes, various other semi-crappy manual lenses and stuff.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Joergeske
Senior Member
633 posts
Joined Feb 2009
Location: Manhattan KS
     
Jul 30, 2010 17:24 |  #17

When I first saw the image and I thought, "wow love the background" then my eyes kind of danced around the tree a bit and said wait a sec that doesn't quite belong here. As a few others have stated the tree appears to be kind of just floating. However, unlike the others I don't think the tree needs more light, a strong use of negative space created by the tree and grounds silhouette could be used to connect the tree to the earth just as well without harming the look you are going for. I also feel that perhaps the warmth of the light in contrast with the coolness of the storm clouds might be amplifying the disconnect a bit. Finally the super wide nature of the composition doesn't seem to play well with your use of rule of thirds. The tree which should be our subject is a bit to far to the right and allows the eye to see the background of monument valley as its own image which serves to disconnect the two even more.

Even so I can't help but be drawn to this image, and I have to say that if I were you I would be proud to have taken a shot with this much potential, and be out there the next chance I got to see if I could make it every bit as perfect as we all think it can be.


www.joergeske.com (external link)
Nikon D800, Nikon D600 x2
Nikon 14-24 2.8AF-S G, Nikon 24-70 2.8 AF-S G, Nikon 70-200 2.8 VR II AF-S G, Nikon 28 1.8G, Nikon 35mm 1.4 G, Sigma 50 1.4, Sigma 50 1.4 Art, Nikon 85 1.4G, Nikon 105 2.8 VR Micro

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Titus213
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
19,403 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 36
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Kalama, WA USA
     
Jul 30, 2010 21:16 |  #18

archer1960 wrote in post #10631609 (external link)
I guess I'm in the minority here; I really like the whole composition with the one tree standing alone. I might have lightened the whole thing up just a bit, but overall I like the gloomy feel.

You're not alone, that's for sure. I like it. The tree doesn't bother me at all, it fits. To brighten the roots would cause issues across the whole foreground IMO.

Wonderful capture.


Dave
Perspiring photographer.
Visit NorwoodPhotos.comexternal link

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Desertraptor
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
11,550 posts
Gallery: 212 photos
Likes: 395
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Adelaide, Australia
     
Jul 31, 2010 07:13 |  #19

i like it


Peter
Canon 6D|60D|40D
Lens 10-22mm f2.8|50mm f 1.8|100mm f2.8 Macro

24-70mm f2.8|L100-400mm f4.5-5.6L
Flash 430EX II
Telescope Skywatcher 600mm ED80 f7.5 GEM EQ3

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
preciousvoices
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
561 posts
Likes: 17
Joined Oct 2008
Location: QLD Australia
     
Aug 01, 2010 02:23 |  #20

Tvw wrote in post #10631220 (external link)
Compelling shot of this wonderful area.

Thank you

Firegems wrote in post #10631478 (external link)
I really like the mountains and the 'gloomy" feel to the shot until I get to the tree.. It just looks out of sorts with it being lit up and nothing else is. If the lighting went furthur then the tree it might work a little more. All in all I do think you have a nice shot.

Thanks for the feedback - I'm trying more to tell a story than I am trying to showcase the landscape - the story's primary character is the tree.

archer1960 wrote in post #10631609 (external link)
I guess I'm in the minority here; I really like the whole composition with the one tree standing alone. I might have lightened the whole thing up just a bit, but overall I like the gloomy feel.

Cheers archer

Joergeske wrote in post #10633544 (external link)
When I first saw the image and I thought, "wow love the background" then my eyes kind of danced around the tree a bit and said wait a sec that doesn't quite belong here. As a few others have stated the tree appears to be kind of just floating. However, unlike the others I don't think the tree needs more light, a strong use of negative space created by the tree and grounds silhouette could be used to connect the tree to the earth just as well without harming the look you are going for. I also feel that perhaps the warmth of the light in contrast with the coolness of the storm clouds might be amplifying the disconnect a bit. Finally the super wide nature of the composition doesn't seem to play well with your use of rule of thirds. The tree which should be our subject is a bit to far to the right and allows the eye to see the background of monument valley as its own image which serves to disconnect the two even more.

Even so I can't help but be drawn to this image, and I have to say that if I were you I would be proud to have taken a shot with this much potential, and be out there the next chance I got to see if I could make it every bit as perfect as we all think it can be.

appreciate you taking the time to offer your feedback, you make some good points, I used rule of thirds as a guideline, but as you said it allows you to take in the rest of the story and that they are 2 disconnected bodies, the tree and it's environment with the tree displaying a warm glow signifying HOPE, the cool tones of the environment represent the ADVERSITY - the tree triumphant and rising above the adversity

Titus213 wrote in post #10634413 (external link)
You're not alone, that's for sure. I like it. The tree doesn't bother me at all, it fits. To brighten the roots would cause issues across the whole foreground IMO.

Wonderful capture.

thank you

Desertraptor wrote in post #10636228 (external link)
i like it

cheers


Cheers Darren:)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rgmcleod
Senior Member
Avatar
618 posts
Joined Nov 2006
Location: Austin, TX
     
Aug 01, 2010 17:03 |  #21

I like the shot


Ron McLeod
"Remember, you are unique. Like everyone else"
Pentax Spotmatic, Nikon Photomic FTN, Olympus 2100UZ, Canon SD200, SD400, SD 630, Canon G9, Canon 30D (28-135MM, 70-300MM, 10-22MM) Speedlite 580 EX II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,189 views & 0 likes for this thread, 16 members have posted to it.
Glasshouse Mountains
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Nature & Landscapes 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Frankie Frankenberry
1788 guests, 130 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.