I guess I'm in the minority here; I really like the whole composition with the one tree standing alone. I might have lightened the whole thing up just a bit, but overall I like the gloomy feel.
Jul 30, 2010 11:22 | #16 I guess I'm in the minority here; I really like the whole composition with the one tree standing alone. I might have lightened the whole thing up just a bit, but overall I like the gloomy feel. Gripped 7D, gripped, full-spectrum modfied T1i (500D), SX50HS, A2E film body, Tamzooka (150-600), Tamron 90mm/2.8 VC (ver 2), Tamron 18-270 VC, Canon FD 100 f/4.0 macro, Canon 24-105 f/4L,Canon EF 200 f/2.8LII, Canon 85 f/1.8, Tamron Adaptall 2 90mmf/2.5 Macro, Tokina 11-16, Canon EX-430 flash, Vivitar DF-383 flash, Astro-Tech AT6RC and Celestron NexStar 102 GT telescopes, various other semi-crappy manual lenses and stuff.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Joergeske Senior Member 633 posts Joined Feb 2009 Location: Manhattan KS More info | Jul 30, 2010 17:24 | #17 When I first saw the image and I thought, "wow love the background" then my eyes kind of danced around the tree a bit and said wait a sec that doesn't quite belong here. As a few others have stated the tree appears to be kind of just floating. However, unlike the others I don't think the tree needs more light, a strong use of negative space created by the tree and grounds silhouette could be used to connect the tree to the earth just as well without harming the look you are going for. I also feel that perhaps the warmth of the light in contrast with the coolness of the storm clouds might be amplifying the disconnect a bit. Finally the super wide nature of the composition doesn't seem to play well with your use of rule of thirds. The tree which should be our subject is a bit to far to the right and allows the eye to see the background of monument valley as its own image which serves to disconnect the two even more. www.joergeske.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Titus213 Cream of the Crop More info | Jul 30, 2010 21:16 | #18 archer1960 wrote in post #10631609 I guess I'm in the minority here; I really like the whole composition with the one tree standing alone. I might have lightened the whole thing up just a bit, but overall I like the gloomy feel. You're not alone, that's for sure. I like it. The tree doesn't bother me at all, it fits. To brighten the roots would cause issues across the whole foreground IMO. Dave
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Desertraptor Cream of the Crop More info | Jul 31, 2010 07:13 | #19 i like it Peter
LOG IN TO REPLY |
preciousvoices THREAD STARTER Senior Member 561 posts Likes: 17 Joined Oct 2008 Location: QLD Australia More info | Aug 01, 2010 02:23 | #20 Tvw wrote in post #10631220 Compelling shot of this wonderful area. Thank you Firegems wrote in post #10631478 I really like the mountains and the 'gloomy" feel to the shot until I get to the tree.. It just looks out of sorts with it being lit up and nothing else is. If the lighting went furthur then the tree it might work a little more. All in all I do think you have a nice shot. Thanks for the feedback - I'm trying more to tell a story than I am trying to showcase the landscape - the story's primary character is the tree. archer1960 wrote in post #10631609 I guess I'm in the minority here; I really like the whole composition with the one tree standing alone. I might have lightened the whole thing up just a bit, but overall I like the gloomy feel. Cheers archer Joergeske wrote in post #10633544 When I first saw the image and I thought, "wow love the background" then my eyes kind of danced around the tree a bit and said wait a sec that doesn't quite belong here. As a few others have stated the tree appears to be kind of just floating. However, unlike the others I don't think the tree needs more light, a strong use of negative space created by the tree and grounds silhouette could be used to connect the tree to the earth just as well without harming the look you are going for. I also feel that perhaps the warmth of the light in contrast with the coolness of the storm clouds might be amplifying the disconnect a bit. Finally the super wide nature of the composition doesn't seem to play well with your use of rule of thirds. The tree which should be our subject is a bit to far to the right and allows the eye to see the background of monument valley as its own image which serves to disconnect the two even more. Even so I can't help but be drawn to this image, and I have to say that if I were you I would be proud to have taken a shot with this much potential, and be out there the next chance I got to see if I could make it every bit as perfect as we all think it can be. appreciate you taking the time to offer your feedback, you make some good points, I used rule of thirds as a guideline, but as you said it allows you to take in the rest of the story and that they are 2 disconnected bodies, the tree and it's environment with the tree displaying a warm glow signifying HOPE, the cool tones of the environment represent the ADVERSITY - the tree triumphant and rising above the adversity Titus213 wrote in post #10634413 You're not alone, that's for sure. I like it. The tree doesn't bother me at all, it fits. To brighten the roots would cause issues across the whole foreground IMO. Wonderful capture. thank you Desertraptor wrote in post #10636228 i like it cheers Cheers Darren
LOG IN TO REPLY |
rgmcleod Senior Member 618 posts Joined Nov 2006 Location: Austin, TX More info | Aug 01, 2010 17:03 | #21 I like the shot Ron McLeod
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Frankie Frankenberry 1788 guests, 130 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||