Choose: 18-55IS + 70-200 f/4 or sigma 17-70 OS + 55-250IS

I mostly shoot landscapes and family pics around the house/vacation/etc. Been toying with the idea of trying to sell some of my pics from local south jersey areas, especially the shore; mostly to support my hobby.

Let me know which 2 lens combo you would prefer for these?

i voted for #2 only because the sigma is faster than the 18-55

I voted for #1 only because it included the 70-200

I'd go with the 17-70 and the 70-200 F4L.

Agreed +1

smmokan wrote in post #10618637
I'd go with the 17-70 and the 70-200 F4L.

smmokan wrote in post #10618637
I'd go with the 17-70 and the 70-200 F4L.

Thanks guys but you're not helping

I should add that I haven't been happy with my 18-55IS. Also wondering how much better the 17-70 will be when comparing it to the 18-55. If anyone has any insights there, it would be appreciated.

I voted for #2 as I think the Sigma 17-70 would be a bit more versatile for what you describe. With that being said, now let's talk about a trade for your 70-200...j/k.

I own a 18-55 IS and for the price I think this lens is a good lens. The additional benefit of owning this lens is that it is light and compact. So, if you like to travel light this lens is a plus. On the other hand, I also own a 70-200 f/2.8L. This lens is also a fantastic lens. However, your question is concerning the 70-200 f/4 No-IS. My view in this regard is that if you pick the 70-200 No-IS you will be getting a phenomenal lens. No question about it. So, if you can live without IS, go for it. Finally, keep in mind the 55-250 is a very good lens for the price. It also has IS, is light and it has more range.
Hence, if I were you I pick the Sigma 17-70 and the 70-200 f/4.