Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos The Business of Photography 
Thread started 28 Jul 2010 (Wednesday) 10:28
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

NYC photographer suing over image use

 
SnapsbyPoteat
Senior Member
Avatar
985 posts
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Northwest Arkansas
     
Jul 28, 2010 22:40 |  #16

this has something to do with Will Smith and she's only sueing for 150,000? Seems like she could get more than that.


Gear list: Canon 5D Mk II, 7D tokina 11-16/2.8, Sigma 30 1.4 , Canon 50 1.2 L, 85 1.8,100 2.8 L macro, 580ex,
www.snapsbypoteat.com (external link) . Facebook Page (external link)The Blog (external link)
The wedding page www.melaniepoteat.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mike-DT6
Goldmember
Avatar
3,963 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Oct 2007
Location: The Jurassic Coast, Dorset, England.
     
Jul 29, 2010 05:13 |  #17

There's definitely an element of irony in all this, considering that the photograph is of Nigerian origin.


Gear list

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
WMS
"Escargot on the Hoof"
Avatar
2,887 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Nov 2006
     
Jul 29, 2010 05:46 |  #18

For those who are interested this case is mentioned in the "thecopyrightzone" blog at;

http://thecopyrightzon​e.com/?p=449 (external link)

This blog is written by a copyright attorney and is usually accurate on the legalities. Subject to there disclaimer.

Wayne


I'm just a simple maker of love charms and tokens,who occasionally takes a picture or two.
Gear list: more toys than I need, Fewer than I want.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
david69
Member
43 posts
Joined Dec 2009
     
Jul 29, 2010 11:28 as a reply to  @ WMS's post |  #19

WMS wrote:
For those who are interested this case is mentioned in the "thecopyrightzone" blog at; http://thecopyrightzon​e.com/?p=449 (external link)

Thanks for that... it's the best URL (and an interesting blog).


David Hutchison
Elderly Website (external link)
"Your first 10,000 photographs are your worst."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
KennyG
Goldmember
Avatar
2,252 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2003
Location: Leeds, UK
     
Jul 29, 2010 17:12 |  #20

One good thing about proving photography copyright is that no one can take an identical photograph unless they had absoluteluy identical equipment, down to the pixel, in the precise location at the same milisecond the picture was taken. Exif info is incidental.

Been there, done that, and the magazine that ripped of the image paid up ten times what they could have had it for.


Ken
Professional Motorsport Photographer
2 x 1D MK-II, 7D, 17-40L, 24-70L, 70-200 2.8L IS, 100-400L,
300 2.8L IS, 500 4.0L IS, 85 1.8, 50 1.4, 1.4 & 2.0 MK-II TC.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
L.J.G.
"Not brigth enough"
Avatar
10,463 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 46
Joined Jul 2010
Location: ɹǝpun uʍop
     
Jul 29, 2010 17:37 |  #21

I hope she wins it. It annoys me that people think they can just use somebody else's image without even asking first. Theft is theft, no matter what you steal.


Lloyd
Never make the same mistake twice, there are so many new ones, try a different one each day
Gear Flick (external link)r

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
thebishopp
Goldmember
1,903 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jun 2008
Location: Indiana
     
Jul 29, 2010 22:17 |  #22

It's why I think it is so funny that the music and film industry is so sue happy when it comes to people "stealing" their work (distributing free copies online with no profit) but don't think twice about trying to "steal" things they want from others to make a buck. Hypocrites.


"Please use the comments to demonstrate your own ignorance, unfamiliarity with empirical data, ability to repeat discredited memes, and lack of respect for scientific knowledge. Also, be sure to create straw men and argue against things I have neither said nor even implied. Any irrelevancies you can mention will also be appreciated. Lastly, kindly forgo all civility in your discourse . . . you are, after all, anonymous." My Zen (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,853 views & 0 likes for this thread, 15 members have posted to it.
NYC photographer suing over image use
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos The Business of Photography 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1614 guests, 140 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.