Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Astronomy & Celestial 
Thread started 29 Jul 2010 (Thursday) 22:26
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

First moon with 70-200 f4L

 
customsound79
Member
Avatar
81 posts
Joined Feb 2010
Location: Mississippi
     
Jul 29, 2010 22:26 |  #1

Here it is....cropped like crazy

IMAGE: http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p53/customsound79/IMG_5995.jpg

Formal education is fueled by the thirst for a degree, self education is fueled by the thirst for knowledge.
The Toy Box
The Website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Celestron
Cream of the Crop
8,641 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 406
Joined Jun 2007
Location: Texas USA
     
Jul 29, 2010 22:57 |  #2

Not bad for your first go at it . Was the moon off center in the lens or did you cropp it off center like that ? Did you enlarge to 100% before you cropped ?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
customsound79
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
81 posts
Joined Feb 2010
Location: Mississippi
     
Jul 29, 2010 23:11 |  #3

Thanks! I cropped it like that and I did not enlarge.


Formal education is fueled by the thirst for a degree, self education is fueled by the thirst for knowledge.
The Toy Box
The Website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bernoulli
Senior Member
Avatar
801 posts
Likes: 20
Joined Aug 2008
Location: NW Arkansas
     
Jul 29, 2010 23:12 as a reply to  @ Celestron's post |  #4

It's a nice shot. I have the same comment that I have for the other new Moon shot in the forum tonight - I think it's a tad overexposed. I don't know why, but maybe I just prefer them a little darker. Maybe I need calibration! I bet Celestron's sick of hearing me say it ;).

I do like the sharpness of that L lens; it does seem to make a difference. I'm very excited to report that I ordered my first white lens just today for hummers by day and maybe the Moon by night.

But this is a good image and I kind of like the off-center look.


Rick
rulrich@uark.edu (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
customsound79
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
81 posts
Joined Feb 2010
Location: Mississippi
     
Jul 29, 2010 23:17 |  #5

It's funny that I underexposed to get a faster shutter speed. This is my second attempt. The first was with a 55-250mm but the L glass made up for the lack of the extra 50mm. How's that for a selling point?


Formal education is fueled by the thirst for a degree, self education is fueled by the thirst for knowledge.
The Toy Box
The Website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Adrena1in
Goldmember
1,703 posts
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Winchester, Hampshire, UK.
     
Jul 30, 2010 07:40 |  #6

Looks very nice to me, though the cropping is a little off-putting I find. I imagine the full moon when I see shots like this, and if yours was full it would be just about touching the edge of the image, which wouldn't itself be that nice.

Otherwise, nice and sharp.


Canon EOS 450D, Sigma 18-200mm, Canon 50mm f/2.5 Macro, 2x TC, Revelation 12" f/5 Dobsonian, Mintron PD2285-EX webcam.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Celestron
Cream of the Crop
8,641 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 406
Joined Jun 2007
Location: Texas USA
     
Jul 30, 2010 08:22 |  #7

Bernoulli wrote in post #10628898 (external link)
It's a nice shot. I have the same comment that I have for the other new Moon shot in the forum tonight - I think it's a tad overexposed. I don't know why, but maybe I just prefer them a little darker. Maybe I need calibration! I bet Celestron's sick of hearing me say it ;).

NAW Bernoulli , you just know my prefered taste of moon brightness ;) : http://home.grandecom.​net/~r.hodges/moon.htm​l (external link)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jsboutin
Member
181 posts
Joined Mar 2008
     
Jul 30, 2010 19:11 as a reply to  @ Celestron's post |  #8

Was there some kind of PP done on this one? What were the settings?

Just curious, I just began taking moon shots, with the same lens, and I'm getting softer results (Or that could be the crappy old focusing on my Rebel XT:confused:)


EOS Digital Rebel XT, EF 17-40 F/4 L and 70-200 f/4 L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
customsound79
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
81 posts
Joined Feb 2010
Location: Mississippi
     
Jul 30, 2010 20:37 |  #9

Cropping, a little levels adjustment, and a 25% sharpening. It's much easier to use live view at full magnification to make sure the focus is good. Also, while the live view was zoomed in, I noticed that anything will make tripod shake enough to cause soft focus. I lowered mine down to about 2 1/2 feet from the ground. Another issue, due to the weight of the lens, the camera takes a little time to stop shaking after you press the shutter. Use the time delay or a remote trigger. Hope that helps.


Formal education is fueled by the thirst for a degree, self education is fueled by the thirst for knowledge.
The Toy Box
The Website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
customsound79
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
81 posts
Joined Feb 2010
Location: Mississippi
     
Jul 30, 2010 20:39 |  #10

Adrena1in wrote in post #10630358 (external link)
Looks very nice to me, though the cropping is a little off-putting I find. I imagine the full moon when I see shots like this, and if yours was full it would be just about touching the edge of the image, which wouldn't itself be that nice.

Otherwise, nice and sharp.

Point taken. I see where you are coming from. Thanks!


Formal education is fueled by the thirst for a degree, self education is fueled by the thirst for knowledge.
The Toy Box
The Website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Celestron
Cream of the Crop
8,641 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 406
Joined Jun 2007
Location: Texas USA
     
Jul 30, 2010 22:25 |  #11

customsound79 wrote in post #10634280 (external link)
Cropping, a little levels adjustment, and a 25% sharpening. It's much easier to use live view at full magnification to make sure the focus is good. Also, while the live view was zoomed in, I noticed that anything will make tripod shake enough to cause soft focus. I lowered mine down to about 2 1/2 feet from the ground. Another issue, due to the weight of the lens, the camera takes a little time to stop shaking after you press the shutter. Use the time delay or a remote trigger. Hope that helps.

Best and esiest way is to use "Mirror Lockup" if your camera has it in the "Custom Functions" .




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Celestron
Cream of the Crop
8,641 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 406
Joined Jun 2007
Location: Texas USA
     
Jul 30, 2010 22:36 |  #12

jsboutin wrote in post #10633961 (external link)
Was there some kind of PP done on this one? What were the settings?

Just curious, I just began taking moon shots, with the same lens, and I'm getting softer results (Or that could be the crappy old focusing on my Rebel XT:confused:)

Do you have "Mirror Lockup" in your custom settings ? If so that will help alot at focus issues . Do you manually focus or use the auto focus the lens ? Some ppl say they have better luck manually focusing but i find it easier to set the lens to AF and point at the brightest star or planet like Venus for example in the west in the late evening . Tripod mount the camera , point at Venus , RH forefinger on the shutter button , the forefinger of the LH on the AF-MF switch . Push the shutter button til focus snaps and quickly slide the AF-MF switch back the the MF position and never touch the lens to refocus again . Just point the camera at the moon and start shooting and check each shot upclose for focus . Also this works best if you have the Focus Sensors in the viewer set to use center Focus Sensor only for all Manual Modes . Hope this helps some .




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,182 views & 0 likes for this thread, 5 members have posted to it.
First moon with 70-200 f4L
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Astronomy & Celestial 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Thunderstream
2117 guests, 97 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.