Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff Photography Industry News 
Thread started 31 Jul 2010 (Saturday) 01:03
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

What needs improvement in the 7D?

 
kcbrown
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,384 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2007
Location: Silicon Valley
     
Jul 31, 2010 01:03 |  #1

My contention is that the 7D is so good as it is that there really isn't much to improve on it, except possibly in the arena of video autofocus.

Which is to say, I think the 7D has the makings of a classic the way the 5D classic is, well, a classic. :-)

So here's the question to the forum: is there anything you can think of that Canon will be able to do in the next 2 or 3 iterations of the 7D line that will make for a truly compelling upgrade from the current-generation 7D for someone who shoots still shots?

For me, I can't think of a thing that would be compelling. Yeah, there are some things that could be improved, e.g. low-ISO cleanliness (e.g., make the low-ISO performance when examining 100% crops equal to or better than that of the 5D classic at the same ISOs), but I don't see those things as being truly compelling.

So what do you think would make for a compelling reason to upgrade to a 7D successor for taking still shots (i.e., video improvements don't count for this thread)?


Edited to add: note that I don't really consider changing the sensor for a different sized sensor to really be a valid response here, because doing that would essentially create an entirely new camera (or, if the sensor is full-frame, another entry in the 5D line!). My intent with this question is what, if anything, Canon can do within the 1.6x crop family that would make for a compelling upgrade from the 7D for still-shot photographers.


"There are some things that money can't buy, but they aren't Ls and aren't worth having" -- Shooter-boy
Canon: 2 x 7D, Sigma 17-50 f/2.8 OS, 55-250 IS, Sigma 8-16, 24-105L, Sigma 50/1.4, other assorted primes, and a 430EX.
Nikon: D750, D600, 24-85 VR, 50 f/1.8G, 85 f/1.8G, Tamron 24-70 VC, Tamron 70-300 VC.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
krb
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,818 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Jun 2008
Location: Where southern efficiency and northern charm come together
     
Jul 31, 2010 01:24 |  #2

There was a thread on this last year when it was first released so it'll be interesting to compare the responses now that people have had it for a while.

- User replaceable focus screen would make some people happier.
- True weather sealing would be nice.
- I would like to see even more customization available in button function assignments.
- My only real issue with it is the way the fps slows down in some lighting conditions.

None of those are truly compelling though. Compelling would be a larger sensor, maybe a 1.3 crop sensor like the 1d uses. Too bad that would bump the price so much higher.


-- Ken
Comment and critique is always appreciated!
Flickr (external link)
Gear list

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kcbrown
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,384 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2007
Location: Silicon Valley
     
Jul 31, 2010 03:42 |  #3

krb wrote in post #10635506 (external link)
None of those are truly compelling though. Compelling would be a larger sensor, maybe a 1.3 crop sensor like the 1d uses. Too bad that would bump the price so much higher.

At that point it wouldn't be a 1.6 crop camera anyway, and I'd have to consider it no longer a part of the lineage as such.

So it sounds like your take on it is much the same as mine: like the 5D (or perhaps to an even greater degree), Canon got the 7D so right for still shots that it'll be difficult to significantly improve on it.


"There are some things that money can't buy, but they aren't Ls and aren't worth having" -- Shooter-boy
Canon: 2 x 7D, Sigma 17-50 f/2.8 OS, 55-250 IS, Sigma 8-16, 24-105L, Sigma 50/1.4, other assorted primes, and a 430EX.
Nikon: D750, D600, 24-85 VR, 50 f/1.8G, 85 f/1.8G, Tamron 24-70 VC, Tamron 70-300 VC.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
screem
Member
57 posts
Joined Feb 2010
Location: Denmark
     
Jul 31, 2010 06:03 |  #4

The ability to set a max/min in shutter,aperture, and ISO


_______________

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
benesotor
Goldmember
1,827 posts
Likes: 15
Joined Mar 2009
     
Jul 31, 2010 06:22 |  #5

It's got all the features you'd ever want, and performance and handling can't really get much better without being a 1-series.

Main room for improvement would be in the IQ department, basically putting in a larger sensor. Maybe a new processor would help things.

Oh and yes, usable AF in video would be delightful :)

Generally though... I think Canon got the most out of it they could for that kind of price range, I don't think wrongly of any decision they made with it.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeamSpeed
01010100 01010011
Avatar
40,862 posts
Gallery: 116 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8923
Joined May 2002
Location: Midwest
     
Jul 31, 2010 06:48 |  #6

krb wrote in post #10635506 (external link)
There was a thread on this last year when it was first released so it'll be interesting to compare the responses now that people have had it for a while.

- User replaceable focus screen would make some people happier.
- True weather sealing would be nice.
- I would like to see even more customization available in button function assignments.
- My only real issue with it is the way the fps slows down in some lighting conditions.

None of those are truly compelling though. Compelling would be a larger sensor, maybe a 1.3 crop sensor like the 1d uses. Too bad that would bump the price so much higher.

There is a user-replaceable screen, and there are many aftermarket ones out now.

I would add 5 AEB shots instead of 3, easily done in firmware.

I would add min and max ISO values for the auto-iso mode, again easily done in firmware.


Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery (external link) My Business Gallery (external link)
"Man only has 5 senses, and sometimes not even that, so if they define the world, the universe, the dimensions of existence, and spirituality with just these limited senses, their view of what-is and what-can-be is very myopic indeed and they are doomed, now and forever."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jasonlitka
Senior Member
Avatar
900 posts
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Exton, PA
     
Jul 31, 2010 07:21 |  #7

screem wrote in post #10636103 (external link)
The ability to set a max/min in shutter,aperture, and ISO

That plus a 3:2 screen like the T2i has. I think that's a must for any camera here on out. Screen should match the sensor.

I've been wondering over the past couple years, why does Canon use a smaller APS-C sensor than Sony & Nikon? Could they "upgrade" to a 1.5 crop and still have it work with EF-S lenses? If so, that would help the ISO performance (assuming they could resist the urge to try and break 20MP).


Jason Litka | Philadelphia-Area Tech Executive/Consultant (external link)
Gear: iPhone. Yeah... Certainly don't own more than that... Don't tell my wife, ok?

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JoYork
Goldmember
Avatar
3,079 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Dec 2007
Location: York, England
     
Jul 31, 2010 07:36 |  #8

How about a fullframe sensor that used the inner portion when EF-S lenses are attached?


Jo
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
hpulley
Goldmember
4,390 posts
Joined Oct 2009
     
Jul 31, 2010 07:38 |  #9

Bigger Raw + JPEG buffer, replacable focus screens like the 40D and 50D, clean low ISO, no slowdown in low light. Those are things Canon could do. I'd love the 1D's customizability, more AEB shots, min/max settings in a 7D but asking for that or 1.3x is unreasonable, Canon won't do it because they save that for the 1D (which is why I'm using old 1D bodies).


flickr (external link) 1DIIN 40D 1NRS 650 1.4xII EF12II Pel8 50f1.8I 28-80II 17-40L 24-70L 100-400L 177A 199A OC-E3 RS-80N3

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
hpulley
Goldmember
4,390 posts
Joined Oct 2009
     
Jul 31, 2010 07:40 |  #10

TeamSpeed wrote in post #10636178 (external link)
There is a user-replaceable screen, and there are many aftermarket ones out now.

Know anyone who's done it? How does it mess up the metering? There is no support for it in custom functions unlike the 40D/50D/5D/1D.

TeamSpeed wrote in post #10636178 (external link)
I would add 5 AEB shots instead of 3, easily done in firmware.

I would add min and max ISO values for the auto-iso mode, again easily done in firmware.

All of those are 1D features, won't see them in a 7D. Easy in firmware, been there for 10 years but still haven't moved them down for some reason.


flickr (external link) 1DIIN 40D 1NRS 650 1.4xII EF12II Pel8 50f1.8I 28-80II 17-40L 24-70L 100-400L 177A 199A OC-E3 RS-80N3

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeamSpeed
01010100 01010011
Avatar
40,862 posts
Gallery: 116 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8923
Joined May 2002
Location: Midwest
     
Jul 31, 2010 07:47 |  #11

I would have to dig around here on POTN, that is where this has come up before where folks were pointing out the aftermarket screens.

The T2i allows for ISO ranges to be set from what I can tell, unless I misunderstand...


Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery (external link) My Business Gallery (external link)
"Man only has 5 senses, and sometimes not even that, so if they define the world, the universe, the dimensions of existence, and spirituality with just these limited senses, their view of what-is and what-can-be is very myopic indeed and they are doomed, now and forever."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kcbrown
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,384 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2007
Location: Silicon Valley
     
Jul 31, 2010 07:54 |  #12

I don't really consider changing the sensor for a different sized sensor to really be a valid response here, because doing that would essentially create an entirely new camera (or, if the sensor is full-frame, another entry in the 5D line!). My intent with this question is what, if anything, Canon can do within the 1.6x crop family that would make for a compelling upgrade from the 7D for still-shot photographers.

That said, a full-frame sensor combined with the current feature set would make for a compelling upgrade!


"There are some things that money can't buy, but they aren't Ls and aren't worth having" -- Shooter-boy
Canon: 2 x 7D, Sigma 17-50 f/2.8 OS, 55-250 IS, Sigma 8-16, 24-105L, Sigma 50/1.4, other assorted primes, and a 430EX.
Nikon: D750, D600, 24-85 VR, 50 f/1.8G, 85 f/1.8G, Tamron 24-70 VC, Tamron 70-300 VC.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JRP2661
Member
87 posts
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Toronto, Canada
     
Jul 31, 2010 08:12 as a reply to  @ kcbrown's post |  #13

AF-linked spot metering. Both on 7d and 5D2.
Easy for Canon to do, and I would not accept any argument that one single feature would steal sales away from the 1D's or 1Ds's.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
timnosenzo
Cream of the Crop
8,833 posts
Likes: 14
Joined Sep 2005
Location: CT
     
Jul 31, 2010 08:14 |  #14

krb wrote in post #10635506 (external link)
- User replaceable focus screen would make some people happier.
- True weather sealing would be nice.
- I would like to see even more customization available in button function assignments.

I definitely agree with these, especially the focusing screen issue. Only other thing I would add is better IQ/noise control at high ISO... since we're wishing for things.


connecticut wedding photographer (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
HKGuns
Goldmember
Avatar
1,773 posts
Gallery: 45 photos
Likes: 1669
Joined May 2008
     
Jul 31, 2010 08:23 |  #15

Nearly everything suggested so far are 1D features, I suppose it is good to dream but Canon isn't about to cannibalize 1D sales for the feature's ya'll are looking to get.

Full frame is the funniest one, it's a 1.6 crop! Most of you, couldn't afford the price point of a camera with all of these features, or you would have bought the 1DMIV, which has most, if not all of them.

EDIT! Let me clarify something that doesn't sound right above. By "couldn't afford" I mean "wouldn't spend the money", if you have it or not. I can't say who can afford what here obviously.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

31,838 views & 0 likes for this thread, 78 members have posted to it.
What needs improvement in the 7D?
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff Photography Industry News 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is zachary24
1432 guests, 109 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.