Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
Thread started 31 Jul 2010 (Saturday) 22:33
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Lens hood

 
domat
Senior Member
485 posts
Likes: 14
Joined Jun 2010
Location: New York
     
Jul 31, 2010 22:33 |  #1

What are people thoughts on hoods? I was thinking of getting an ebay one for my 58mm lenses. Do I need one? what type? flower petal, retractable etc.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mtnbkr1
Senior Member
257 posts
Joined Jun 2010
Location: Los Angeles
     
Jul 31, 2010 22:34 |  #2

domat wrote in post #10639655 (external link)
What are people thoughts on hoods? I was thinking of getting an ebay one for my 58mm lenses. Do I need one? what type? flower petal, retractable etc.

I dont know about shape, but from personal experience, I would buy the official Canon one. They are much faster and convenient to remove, flip, and put back on than off brand hoods


5Dc | 85L | 1200 f5.6L | Lighting

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ravensky
Member
48 posts
Joined Jun 2010
Location: Colorado
     
Jul 31, 2010 22:46 |  #3

It depends on the lens you're putting it on. If the front element rotates while focusing (i.e., lots of lenses), you can't use a petal-style hood. All Canon lenses, as far as I know, have an official dedicated hood (e.g., the EW-60C for the 18-55mm lens). If you want to make sure you're getting top quality, perfect fit, get the Canon hood. But for a hunk of plastic, they're expensive. Most of the time, a 3rd-party hood will do just fine (I have two).

Rubber hoods usually just screw into the filter threads. Most are retractable to 2-3 positions, but aren't really designed for a specific lens. I have one on my Nifty Fifty due to the fact that if I used a hard plastic hood and bumped into something, the added leverage on the front element combined with the cheap build quality would end up in a popped off front element.

Hope that helps.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ben_r_
-POTN's Three legged Support-
Avatar
15,894 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Sacramento, CA
     
Aug 01, 2010 00:12 |  #4

You should always use a lens hood when you shoot, and you should buy the one that was specifically designed for your lens (ie the Canon one).


[Gear List | Flickr (external link) | My Reviews] /|\ Tripod Leg Protection (external link) /|\
GIVE a man a fish and he'll eat for a day. TEACH a man to fish and he'll eat for a lifetime.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bigpow
Senior Member
708 posts
Likes: 15
Joined May 2002
     
Aug 01, 2010 00:25 |  #5

doesn't have to be manufacturer's brand, but it has to match the lens.
look for table of lens hood, find the hood model number for your lens, then use ebay or dealextreme and get a cheap knockoff for that model. Knockoff hood's plastic is as just as strong as Canon's. But if you're a brand loyal, then go for the real deal.


[5DM2: 50L, 100L, 24-105L, 70-200/2.8IS L II, Zeiss 2/35 ZE]
[Fuji X100S] [Sony A7 II: 55/1.8, 28-70]

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SuzyView
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
32,094 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 129
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Northern VA
     
Aug 01, 2010 09:08 |  #6

There are many threads already about using hoods. Most of us who shoot a lot use the hoods for several reasons. I mainly use them because they protect the camera and helps with light coming into the lens, especially on sunny days. Some of the L lenses have huge hoods, very intimidating, something to get used to. The primes have clip on hoods that was sometimes difficult to put on and off, but they are worth buying and using if you knock into things a lot because you wear your camera on a neckstrap all day.


Suzie - Still Speaking Canonese!
RF6 Mii, 5DIV, SONY a7iii, 7D2, G12, 6 L's & 2 Primes, 25 bags.
My children and grandchildren are the reason, but it's the passion that drives me to get the perfect image of everything.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
windpig
Chopped liver
Avatar
15,918 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 2264
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Just South of Ballard
     
Aug 01, 2010 09:53 |  #7

Adorama has some knock offs. I got one for my 10-22 and it worked fine. Gotta get one that is lens specific to avoid vignetting, especially in the WA and UWA FLs.


Would you like to buy a vowel?
Go ahead, spin the wheel.
flickr (external link)
I'm accross the canal just south of Ballard, the town Seattle usurped in 1907.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ZedR2
Member
Avatar
171 posts
Joined May 2010
Location: Niagara Ontario Canada
     
Aug 01, 2010 10:27 |  #8

I have always used hoods on all my cameras , keeps the stray light out and it's good if the end of the lens bangs up against something , then the hood is taking the hit and not the lens ...
Buy the Canon hood for the lens you are using ( what is that BTW ? ) The Canon hood is always better IMO plus its 'felt lined' inside to catch the dust so it won't hit the lens and it does work !

( hood om my EF-S 17-55 f2.8 )

IMAGE: http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/ZEDR2/IMG_2039.jpg

Canon 7D | EF-S 18-135 Kit | Canon EF-S 17-55 f2.8 IS USM | Canon 70-200 IS USM f/4L | Canon 100-400L | Canon Grip | 580EX II
~Paul~

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
domat
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
485 posts
Likes: 14
Joined Jun 2010
Location: New York
     
Aug 01, 2010 10:34 |  #9

ZedR2 wrote in post #10641278 (external link)
I have always used hoods on all my cameras , keeps the stray light out and it's good if the end of the lens bangs up against something , then the hood is taking the hit and not the lens ...
Buy the Canon hood for the lens you are using ( what is that BTW ? ) The Canon hood is always better IMO plus its 'felt lined' inside to catch the dust so it won't hit the lens and it does work !

I have the 18-55 is- 55-250 and 50 1.8.

Just ordered one for my 55-250 from ebay. For 3$ can't go to much wrong.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
spotz04
Goldmember
Avatar
1,972 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 30
Joined Mar 2010
Location: Local Yocal, USA
     
Aug 01, 2010 13:29 as a reply to  @ mtnbkr1's post |  #10

I picked up a knockoff from Meritline.com.

55-250 (58mm) for $3.99/free shipping on sale (reg $5.85 at time of purchase). Fits perfectly, no trouble putting it on/off at all. Snug fit.

Also picked up a hood for the 18-55 (58mm) for $1.99/free shipping on sale (reg $4.09) at the same retailer. I should be getting it in the mail this week.

Here you go,

http://www.meritline.c​om …aspx?SearchTerm​=lens+hood (external link)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mjww
Senior Member
675 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Jul 2008
Location: Cayman Islands
     
Aug 01, 2010 13:41 as a reply to  @ domat's post |  #11

For the price they are on ebay, go ahead. If you don't like it, you haven't spent 40 or so dollars compared to buying it from Canon!


Equipment list - According to the wife - "how many more lenses do you need? Yet another camera?"  ???

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BoingoBongo
Member
211 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 12
Joined Nov 2007
Location: California
     
Aug 01, 2010 22:48 |  #12

I love 'em. I find them practical for both reducing flares and for protecting the lens (I tend to get closer than I realize with my wide angle sometimes). Plus, from a purely aesthetic standpoint, I just like the way lenses look with hoods. I have several of the Meritline hoods and they're great, especially for the price.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LV ­ Moose
Moose gets blamed for everything.
Avatar
23,434 posts
Gallery: 223 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 4798
Joined Dec 2008
     
Aug 01, 2010 23:44 as a reply to  @ BoingoBongo's post |  #13

I almost always use a hood unless I'm shooting close-up for macro. I have a rubber collapsible for my 28-135 kit lens, but have lens-specific hard plastic Canon hoods for my others.


Moose

Gear... Flickr (external link)...Flickr 2 (external link)...
Macro (external link)...Hummingbirds (external link)
Aircraft (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bigpow
Senior Member
708 posts
Likes: 15
Joined May 2002
     
Aug 02, 2010 02:51 |  #14

yep - cheap but correct hoods work great
I tried to put matte black tape inside one hood to simulate canon hood's felt lining, but it didn't make any difference, so I never bother
now for $7-12, you could get decent knockoffs with felt lining inside the hood


[5DM2: 50L, 100L, 24-105L, 70-200/2.8IS L II, Zeiss 2/35 ZE]
[Fuji X100S] [Sony A7 II: 55/1.8, 28-70]

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
HelenOster
That's me!
Avatar
4,593 posts
Likes: 659
Joined Jul 2008
Location: New York
     
Aug 02, 2010 04:32 |  #15

windpig wrote in post #10641135 (external link)
Adorama has some knock offs. I got one for my 10-22 and it worked fine. ...

Pleased to hear that the Adorama house branded lens hood works well for you, however, they aren't actually "knock offs" - ie counterfeit.
Adorama (and Flashpoint) are brands in their own right!



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,214 views & 0 likes for this thread, 13 members have posted to it.
Lens hood
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is SteveeY
1211 guests, 168 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.