Taken of the Walker River just south of Topaz Lake in California over the weekend. ISO 100, 18mm, f/10, 60 sec. Let me know what y'all think! 
![]() | HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/png' |
Scottdog129 Senior Member 637 posts Joined Sep 2009 Location: Reno, Nevada USA More info | Aug 02, 2010 11:08 | #1 Taken of the Walker River just south of Topaz Lake in California over the weekend. ISO 100, 18mm, f/10, 60 sec. Let me know what y'all think!
Scott Thompson - www.sthompsonphoto.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Fureinku Goldmember 1,339 posts Likes: 27 Joined May 2006 Location: DFW, TX More info | Aug 02, 2010 11:10 | #2 |
gonzogolf dumb remark memorialized More info | Aug 02, 2010 11:11 | #3 I like the composition and the blurring. Not in love with the colors, not sure what is causing that whether its a treatment or some byproduct of the ND filter. Something strange is goin on in the top right corner though.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 02, 2010 11:16 | #4 gonzogolf wrote in post #10647388 I like the composition and the blurring. Not in love with the colors, not sure what is causing that whether its a treatment or some byproduct of the ND filter. Something strange is goin on in the top right corner though. I actually used a welder's helmet glass. It has a tendency to throw in lens flares on a wide angle lens. If I back off to 10mm, you REALLY see them. When it comes off the camera, its completely green in color so changes in the tint HAVE to happen.
Scott Thompson - www.sthompsonphoto.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gonzogolf dumb remark memorialized More info | Aug 02, 2010 11:17 | #5 That would explain it. Although you should still crop that corner. Time to get yourself a proper ND filter as the welding helmet is just density, not neutral.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 02, 2010 11:22 | #6 gonzogolf wrote in post #10647423 That would explain it. Although you should still crop that corner. Time to get yourself a proper ND filter as the welding helmet is just density, not neutral. Understood, but a ND filter that allows for 1 minute + exposure times is a wee bit pricey. And, it was merely an experiment to see what could be done with it. Scott Thompson - www.sthompsonphoto.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gonzogolf dumb remark memorialized More info | Aug 02, 2010 11:25 | #7 Scottdog129 wrote in post #10647454 Understood, but a ND filter that allows for 1 minute + exposure times is a wee bit pricey. And, it was merely an experiment to see what could be done with it. ![]() I understand, well to a point. I think you could get pretty much the same blurring effect with a regular ND filter, or perhaps stacking 2. I'm not a big fan of stacking, but I gotta figure you still get better IQ than welding glass.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 02, 2010 11:27 | #8 gonzogolf wrote in post #10647471 I understand, well to a point. I think you could get pretty much the same blurring effect with a regular ND filter, or perhaps stacking 2. I'm not a big fan of stacking, but I gotta figure you still get better IQ than welding glass. Yeah, Im saving up for a B&W 110. Im sure I can pull off 60+ second exposures with that if I use a small aperture. That way I dont have to worry about flares OR the discoloration. Thanks for the advice! Scott Thompson - www.sthompsonphoto.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Fureinku Goldmember 1,339 posts Likes: 27 Joined May 2006 Location: DFW, TX More info | Aug 02, 2010 11:28 | #9 |
Aug 02, 2010 11:30 | #10 Fureinku wrote in post #10647485 check ebay, u can find sets for 30 bucks.. now they arent fantastic.. but as gonzo mention, its gotta be better than welding glass I actually bought a set of those and tried stacking them and they left the pictures with a rose-colored tint to them. Weird and kind of a waste of money. If youre interested, I could post the ones I took with it. Again, this was just an experiment to see what could be done with the glass attached to the lens. Thanks for the info! Scott Thompson - www.sthompsonphoto.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MHO Goldmember 1,406 posts Likes: 26 Joined Jun 2009 Location: Kingston, Surrey More info | Aug 02, 2010 13:09 | #11 May be a little more red and less green and blue would make it look more realistic. MHO Photography on Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 02, 2010 13:22 | #12 MHO wrote in post #10648056 Also, what is that deep purple mark at the bottom left & top right corners? Its a byproduct of the glass that I used with the wide angle lens. When you dont back all the way to 10mm, you dont see it. Thanks for the comments! Scott Thompson - www.sthompsonphoto.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 03, 2010 10:21 | #13 I think it looks great, going to get a welding glass today for the few times i want long daytime exposures...not willing yet to put 50-100$ + for an ND filter. 6D, Sigma 24mm f1.4 art, sigma 85 f1.4 art
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Flo Gimmie Some Lovin 44,987 posts Likes: 16 Joined Jul 2007 Location: Nanaimo,B.C. More info | Not my cuppa, too many blown areas, color feels strange( I know its an edit)..the sphering in the top corner.that blue? you're a great friend, but if Zombies chase us, I am tripping you.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 03, 2010 10:33 | #15 johnandbentley wrote in post #10843363 I think it looks great, going to get a welding glass today for the few times i want long daytime exposures...not willing yet to put 50-100$ + for an ND filter. Thanks, man. Yeah, I was going to drop the $136 for a 10-stop filter, but I thought this might be fun. Turns out, it is! Scott Thompson - www.sthompsonphoto.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2881 guests, 132 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||