Hi
I am thinking to buy 70-200mm f/2.8L is usm lenses BUT may not worth use my 500D ?
What you think ?
Thanks
Alan 
Alaneos500 Mostly Lurking  15 posts Joined Jul 2009 More info | Aug 02, 2010 15:27 | #1 Hi Canon 500D + 18-55mm - SOLD
LOG IN TO REPLY |
CosmoKid Goldmember  4,235 posts Likes: 14 Joined May 2009 Location: NJ More info | Aug 02, 2010 15:32 | #2 The 70-200mm f/2.8L is is definitely worth $500 Joe- 2 bodies, L 2.8 zoom trilogy and a couple of primes
LOG IN TO REPLY |
rhys216 Goldmember 1,814 posts Joined Mar 2010 Location: Oxfordshire More info | Aug 02, 2010 15:35 | #3  Permanent bandoes he mean EOS 500D?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
actprivate Senior Member  499 posts Joined Jun 2008 Location: Australia More info | Aug 02, 2010 16:24 | #4 70-200L IS works nice with any camera. Whether your 500D is up to your demand is a separate question. If you don't have a lens in this FL range or you're looking for better optical and overall performance of an L-grade zoom, then you shouldn't be disappointed. _______________
LOG IN TO REPLY |
k-lo Goldmember  1,316 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jan 2010 Location: Lost in SN's Canon vs Nikon Thread More info | Aug 02, 2010 17:21 | #5 worth every penny... -=Karlo=- 1D III, 5D Mark II, 17-40 4 L, 35 1.4 L 24-70 2.8 L, 135mm 2.0 L, 85mm 1.2 L II, 300mm f 2.8 L, 580EX II, and a crapload of Elinchrom Gear
LOG IN TO REPLY |
sm1rf Senior Member  940 posts Likes: 2 Joined Jul 2006 Location: Rawtenstall, Lancashire, England More info | Aug 02, 2010 17:26 | #6 Possibly my most favourite lens. This thing never fails to impress! "Skill in photography is acquired by practice and not purchase"
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jsboutin Member 181 posts Joined Mar 2008 More info | Aug 02, 2010 17:38 | #7 CosmoKid wrote in post #10648827  The 70-200mm f/2.8L is is definitely worth $500 I'm pretty sure he's talking about the 500D camera. EOS Digital Rebel XT, EF 17-40 F/4 L and 70-200 f/4 L
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Snydremark my very own Lightrules moment More info | Better glass is always a good investment if you need that particular focal length. If your budget can handle it there isn't any reason NOT to pair the two up - Eric S.: My Birds/Wildlife
LOG IN TO REPLY |
themadman Cream of the Crop  18,871 posts Likes: 14 Joined Nov 2009 Location: Northern California More info | Aug 02, 2010 19:44 | #10 Nothing wrong with using a nice lens on a entry level DSLR. It will benefit you just the same as any other camera! Will | WilliamLiuPhotography.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Janusorion Member 30 posts Joined Jul 2007 More info | Aug 02, 2010 23:24 | #11 When you buy a lens like that I don't think you'll upgrade any time soon. Its a one and done. You can always upgrade the body later.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
crayzie418 Senior Member  635 posts Joined Oct 2008 Location: SoCAL More info | Aug 03, 2010 00:29 | #12 Permanent banI used to use the 70-200 2.8 IS with a 450D and loved it 7D - 24-70L 28mm 1.8
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DeVVitt Senior Member 362 posts Joined Aug 2009 Location: The Netherlands More info | Aug 03, 2010 04:44 | #14 Amazing lens. Absolutely love mine on a 1.6x body! My most used lens since I have it.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
it`sme Goldmember 1,401 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jul 2010 Location: Miyagi, Japan More info | as long as you are not buying it on line from China eh...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2764 guests, 179 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
